You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to slide-dev@jakarta.apache.org by Oliver Zeigermann <ol...@gmail.com> on 2004/10/22 20:26:57 UTC
Dedicated release for the store section as well?
I was wondering, shouldn't we have a dedicated release for the stores
as well? Of course they completely rely on the core, but it might be
an idea to decouple them so the same release might work with both 2.1
and maybe later with 2.2.
Might make release cycles of the core - and maybe even of the stores -
even smaller.
If this is a good idea, anyone voluteering to be the RM for this?
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Dedicated release for the store section as well?
Posted by Unico Hommes <un...@hippo.nl>.
I agree with Stefan here. IMO there is not much value in a separate
stores release at this time. Not nearly enough to warrant the
additional management overhead.
--
Unico
On 25-okt-04, at 10:47, Stefan Lützkendorf wrote:
> I think makeing too much modules released independently, would
> introduce
> a lot of work - we have to test with different versions, have to track
> what versions have what problems together ...
>
> I think the stores are not an independent component. So I wouldn't
> release them separeted.
>
> And I afraid that the next step will be different releases for
> different stores too (:-). That would of course make some sense too,
> because they have not much in common, but ...
>
> Regards Stefan
>
> Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
>
>> I was wondering, shouldn't we have a dedicated release for the stores
>> as well? Of course they completely rely on the core, but it might be
>> an idea to decouple them so the same release might work with both 2.1
>> and maybe later with 2.2.
>> Might make release cycles of the core - and maybe even of the stores -
>> even smaller.
>> If this is a good idea, anyone voluteering to be the RM for this?
>> Oliver
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Dedicated release for the store section as well?
Posted by Stefan Lützkendorf <lu...@apache.org>.
I think makeing too much modules released independently, would introduce
a lot of work - we have to test with different versions, have to track
what versions have what problems together ...
I think the stores are not an independent component. So I wouldn't
release them separeted.
And I afraid that the next step will be different releases for different
stores too (:-). That would of course make some sense too, because they
have not much in common, but ...
Regards Stefan
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> I was wondering, shouldn't we have a dedicated release for the stores
> as well? Of course they completely rely on the core, but it might be
> an idea to decouple them so the same release might work with both 2.1
> and maybe later with 2.2.
>
> Might make release cycles of the core - and maybe even of the stores -
> even smaller.
>
> If this is a good idea, anyone voluteering to be the RM for this?
>
> Oliver
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Dedicated release for the store section as well?
Posted by James Mason <ma...@apache.org>.
This makes sense to me, but I'm concerned about fragmenting the releases
so much that it becomes harder for users to tell what's going on. Maybe
maven can help manage the complexity?
I'm just not looking forward to bugs that only surface with version
2.1.3 of the core combined with 2.2.4 of the stores and 2.1.7 of the
webdav server when using 2.4.1 of the client library. Just figuring out
what a user has installed will be a pain.
I do think separating out the stores is probably a good idea, though.
-James
On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 11:26, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
> I was wondering, shouldn't we have a dedicated release for the stores
> as well? Of course they completely rely on the core, but it might be
> an idea to decouple them so the same release might work with both 2.1
> and maybe later with 2.2.
>
> Might make release cycles of the core - and maybe even of the stores -
> even smaller.
>
> If this is a good idea, anyone voluteering to be the RM for this?
>
> Oliver
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: slide-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: slide-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org