You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com> on 2007/10/29 18:56:32 UTC
3.0 M2 Release Vote
Hi all,
I'd like to raise the vote to release Cayenne 3.0 M2. This was tagged a
couple weeks back, but has seen some bug fixes since then. Andrus has
tested on several platforms with various DB engines. His results were all
positive.
I've built, signed, and posted assemblies here:
http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M2/
Note that I've built the Windows one, but did have a single test failure.
Given that it was not observed on other platforms, it was likely an
environmental thing. I will try to look into it some more.
Also, this is my first attempt at signing assemblies, so please verify the
signatures.
Thanks,
Kevin
Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On Oct 29, 2007, at 8:13 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> Yeah. I was looking a bit, and I think we'd need a new assembly
> profile.
> It turned out to be a lot quicker to untar and zip it up manually.
> Not
> ideal, but I felt zip really should be used for the Windows release.
>
> If not, I can put the gzipped tarballs up,
I'd say zip is fine. Although WinZip understands tar.gz so it
shouldn't scare no Windows users.
> but I'm not sure it gains us much.
I'd say consistency is important, so we need to pursue a separate
profile for the next release, so that it is automated. Otherwise
we'll have a different format every time :-)
Andrus
Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
Yeah. I was looking a bit, and I think we'd need a new assembly profile.
It turned out to be a lot quicker to untar and zip it up manually. Not
ideal, but I felt zip really should be used for the Windows release.
If not, I can put the gzipped tarballs up, but I'm not sure it gains us
much.
--
Kevin
On 10/29/07 2:05 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Nice!!
>
> A question - I can't find what in the Maven build triggers .zip
> creation for Windows? We built 3.0M1 as .tar.gz for Win, so I was
> surprised to see zips.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:56 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to raise the vote to release Cayenne 3.0 M2. This was
>> tagged a
>> couple weeks back, but has seen some bug fixes since then. Andrus has
>> tested on several platforms with various DB engines. His results
>> were all
>> positive.
>>
>> I've built, signed, and posted assemblies here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M2/
>>
>> Note that I've built the Windows one, but did have a single test
>> failure.
>> Given that it was not observed on other platforms, it was likely an
>> environmental thing. I will try to look into it some more.
>>
>> Also, this is my first attempt at signing assemblies, so please
>> verify the
>> signatures.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>
--
Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Nice!!
A question - I can't find what in the Maven build triggers .zip
creation for Windows? We built 3.0M1 as .tar.gz for Win, so I was
surprised to see zips.
Andrus
On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:56 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to raise the vote to release Cayenne 3.0 M2. This was
> tagged a
> couple weeks back, but has seen some bug fixes since then. Andrus has
> tested on several platforms with various DB engines. His results
> were all
> positive.
>
> I've built, signed, and posted assemblies here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M2/
>
> Note that I've built the Windows one, but did have a single test
> failure.
> Given that it was not observed on other platforms, it was likely an
> environmental thing. I will try to look into it some more.
>
> Also, this is my first attempt at signing assemblies, so please
> verify the
> signatures.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no>.
Hello.
On Oct 29, 2007, at 18:56 , Kevin Menard wrote:
> I'd like to raise the vote to release Cayenne 3.0 M2. This was
> tagged a
> couple weeks back, but has seen some bug fixes since then. Andrus has
> tested on several platforms with various DB engines. His results
> were all
> positive.
>
> I've built, signed, and posted assemblies here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M2/
+1
I have tested with all of our internal tests on both PostgreSQL and
Derby.
Regards,
- Tore.
Re: CayenneModeler missing from generic assembly... Re: 3.0 M2
Release Vote
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
Yeap. Looks like that was the case. I guess I should have tested that, but
assumed the assembly was correct. In any event, it's been updated.
As an aside, for the intel Mac users, I highly recommend getting MacFusion.
SCP is quite nice with it.
--
Kevin
On 10/29/07 2:45 PM, "Andrus Adamchik" <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Noticed the differences between the file sizes between M2 and M1:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M2/
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M1/
>
> Looks like cayenne-3.0M2.tar.gz is missing "bin/CayenneModeler.jar".
>
> Andrus
CayenneModeler missing from generic assembly... Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Noticed the differences between the file sizes between M2 and M1:
http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M2/
http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M1/
Looks like cayenne-3.0M2.tar.gz is missing "bin/CayenneModeler.jar".
Andrus
On Oct 29, 2007, at 7:56 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to raise the vote to release Cayenne 3.0 M2. This was
> tagged a
> couple weeks back, but has seen some bug fixes since then. Andrus has
> tested on several platforms with various DB engines. His results
> were all
> positive.
>
> I've built, signed, and posted assemblies here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M2/
>
> Note that I've built the Windows one, but did have a single test
> failure.
> Given that it was not observed on other platforms, it was likely an
> environmental thing. I will try to look into it some more.
>
> Also, this is my first attempt at signing assemblies, so please
> verify the
> signatures.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
On 31/10/2007, at 8:41 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
>>
>> But, doc folder looks odd. Andrus, we worked on getting those docs
>> to be generated out of the web site styled docs rather than the
>> crappy Confluence style. What do we need to do to get that sorted?
>
> Sorry - this has been sitting on my TODO list since July. I need to
> get to it rather sooner than later.... So M2 still has the old-
> style docs...
>
> Andrus
OK. Let's do that for M3 then.
+1 for this release.
Ari
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
phone +61 2 9660 9700
PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On Oct 31, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
> But, doc folder looks odd. Andrus, we worked on getting those docs
> to be generated out of the web site styled docs rather than the
> crappy Confluence style. What do we need to do to get that sorted?
Sorry - this has been sitting on my TODO list since July. I need to
get to it rather sooner than later.... So M2 still has the old-style
docs...
Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
>> On 10/29/07 1:56 PM, "Kevin Menard" <km...@servprise.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to raise the vote to release Cayenne 3.0 M2. This was
>>> tagged a
>>> couple weeks back, but has seen some bug fixes since then.
>>> Andrus has
>>> tested on several platforms with various DB engines. His results
>>> were all
>>> positive.
>>>
>>> I've built, signed, and posted assemblies here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M2/
I checked:
* all MD5 hashes are good
* PGP signing of .dmg is fine (which means that the others are
probably right). KEYS file is valid.
* superficially all looks with the packages
* code is good since we are using svn from only about 2 weeks ago in
our testing for the next release of our commercial software. It is
getting a good workout.
But, doc folder looks odd. Andrus, we worked on getting those docs to
be generated out of the web site styled docs rather than the crappy
Confluence style. What do we need to do to get that sorted?
Ari
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
phone +61 2 9660 9700
PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
Well, for me, it can be harder to look at it during the week. I'm not
even going to guess for others. I've been relatively busy lately and
feel like a dead weight here. My Cayenne to-do and wish list keep
getting pushed off. I'm still hopeful, though. :-)
/dev/mrg
On 11/2/07, Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com> wrote:
> Heh. I thought I was helping out by doing it on a Monday. I figured that
> way everyone had time during the week to do the testing and the release
> could be posted by the end of the week. Also, for a purely selfish reason,
> it's easier for me to take the necessary time to build the assemblies over
> the weekends.
>
> If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule of thumb
> to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
> On 11/2/07 9:57 AM, "Michael Gentry" <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > You should start these vote things on Thursdays or Fridays so some of
> > us have a chance over a weekend to do testing. :-)
> >
> > /dev/mrg
> >
> >
> > On 11/2/07, Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com> wrote:
> >> The vote has been open for over 72 hours and we have the following results:
> >>
> >> -1: 0
> >> 0: 0
> >> +1: 4 (all binding)
> >>
> >> That indicates a successful vote for release. So, I guess the next step is
> >> actually posting the artifacts and update the Web site.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Ok, my hotel room in GMT +3 last night turned out to have no internet
at all, so instead I chose to go to a reggae concert and drink beer
all night :-) Tonight I am on US East Coast, and should be able to
publish the release first thing Sunday morning.
Andrus
On Nov 8, 2007, at 6:26 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> BTW, if I remember correctly, Andrus is GMT+0200, which means he is 7
> hours ahead of the US East Coast. That means it is unlikely he'll
> want to do something on a weeknight with us (6pm for us would be 1am
> for him).
>
> Andrus, if you want to be part of it, would sometime this weekend be
> good? Otherwise I guess Kevin and I could try to do it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> /dev/mrg
>
>
> On 11/8/07, Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, I wasn't able to do it the past couple nights. I
>> had another
>> deadline with a ROP project (as you probably saw).
>>
>> Tonight is a no-go for me too . . . Got a soccer game.
>>
>> Tomorrow evening I will have time for sure. But, if you and
>> Andrus want to
>> handle it before then, by all means go ahead. I don't want to
>> hold anything
>> up any more because of my schedule. Otherwise, we can meet up in
>> the IRC
>> room to divy up tasks tomorrow evening (I'm EDT by the way).
>>
>> --
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> On 11/8/07 1:59 PM, "Michael Gentry" <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I am free (relatively) the next few evenings if I can be of help.
>>>
>>> /dev/mrg
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 8, 2007 11:16 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> BTW, if you are to busy with other things, I can help publishing
>>>> the
>>>> release. I am traveling on business between tonight and
>>>> Saturday, but
>>>> I hope to have decent internet in the hotels along the way (and if
>>>> not, I can do it on Sunday).
>>>>
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I can do it, but it will likely take me another day or so.
>>>>> Although,
>>>>> there's the possibility I can squeeze it in tonight.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Kevin
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:46 AM
>>>>> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
>>>>>
>>>>> So who is going to publish the release and update the site?
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
BTW, if I remember correctly, Andrus is GMT+0200, which means he is 7
hours ahead of the US East Coast. That means it is unlikely he'll
want to do something on a weeknight with us (6pm for us would be 1am
for him).
Andrus, if you want to be part of it, would sometime this weekend be
good? Otherwise I guess Kevin and I could try to do it.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 11/8/07, Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, I wasn't able to do it the past couple nights. I had another
> deadline with a ROP project (as you probably saw).
>
> Tonight is a no-go for me too . . . Got a soccer game.
>
> Tomorrow evening I will have time for sure. But, if you and Andrus want to
> handle it before then, by all means go ahead. I don't want to hold anything
> up any more because of my schedule. Otherwise, we can meet up in the IRC
> room to divy up tasks tomorrow evening (I'm EDT by the way).
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
> On 11/8/07 1:59 PM, "Michael Gentry" <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I am free (relatively) the next few evenings if I can be of help.
> >
> > /dev/mrg
> >
> >
> > On Nov 8, 2007 11:16 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> >> BTW, if you are to busy with other things, I can help publishing the
> >> release. I am traveling on business between tonight and Saturday, but
> >> I hope to have decent internet in the hotels along the way (and if
> >> not, I can do it on Sunday).
> >>
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >>
> >> On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> >>
> >>> I can do it, but it will likely take me another day or so. Although,
> >>> there's the possibility I can squeeze it in tonight.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Kevin
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:46 AM
> >>> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
> >>>
> >>> So who is going to publish the release and update the site?
> >>>
> >>> Andrus
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
> --
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to do it the past couple nights. I had another
deadline with a ROP project (as you probably saw).
Tonight is a no-go for me too . . . Got a soccer game.
Tomorrow evening I will have time for sure. But, if you and Andrus want to
handle it before then, by all means go ahead. I don't want to hold anything
up any more because of my schedule. Otherwise, we can meet up in the IRC
room to divy up tasks tomorrow evening (I'm EDT by the way).
--
Kevin
On 11/8/07 1:59 PM, "Michael Gentry" <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am free (relatively) the next few evenings if I can be of help.
>
> /dev/mrg
>
>
> On Nov 8, 2007 11:16 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> BTW, if you are to busy with other things, I can help publishing the
>> release. I am traveling on business between tonight and Saturday, but
>> I hope to have decent internet in the hotels along the way (and if
>> not, I can do it on Sunday).
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>>
>>> I can do it, but it will likely take me another day or so. Although,
>>> there's the possibility I can squeeze it in tonight.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:46 AM
>>> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
>>>
>>> So who is going to publish the release and update the site?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>
>>
--
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
I am free (relatively) the next few evenings if I can be of help.
/dev/mrg
On Nov 8, 2007 11:16 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> BTW, if you are to busy with other things, I can help publishing the
> release. I am traveling on business between tonight and Saturday, but
> I hope to have decent internet in the hotels along the way (and if
> not, I can do it on Sunday).
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>
> > I can do it, but it will likely take me another day or so. Although,
> > there's the possibility I can squeeze it in tonight.
> >
> > --
> > Kevin
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:46 AM
> > To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
> >
> > So who is going to publish the release and update the site?
> >
> > Andrus
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
BTW, if you are to busy with other things, I can help publishing the
release. I am traveling on business between tonight and Saturday, but
I hope to have decent internet in the hotels along the way (and if
not, I can do it on Sunday).
Andrus
On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:31 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> I can do it, but it will likely take me another day or so. Although,
> there's the possibility I can squeeze it in tonight.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:46 AM
> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
>
> So who is going to publish the release and update the site?
>
> Andrus
>
RE: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
I can do it, but it will likely take me another day or so. Although,
there's the possibility I can squeeze it in tonight.
--
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 9:46 AM
To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
So who is going to publish the release and update the site?
Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
So who is going to publish the release and update the site?
Andrus
On Nov 5, 2007, at 3:59 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> My test cases, which admittedly are oriented towards Classic Cayenne
> (no JPA) worked fine.
>
> +1 to M2. Let me know if I can help with anything.
>
> Thanks,
>
> /dev/mrg
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2007 10:26 AM, Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com> wrote:
>> Fair enough. Michael et al., if you'd like to test it and be able to
>> cast your vote, I can hold off on posting anything until the start of
>> next week.
>>
>> --
>> Kevin
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
>> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 11:20 AM
>> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
>>
>>
>> On Nov 2, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>>
>>> If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule
>>> of thumb
>>> to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri.
>>
>> Alternatively we keep doing it randomly, but let people request a
>> vote extension.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
FWIW: I just tried my Nested Data Context test here (had it at the
office) and although it worked better than the M1 release, it still
had issues (at least I think so -- I could just not understand the NDC
usage). This is not enough to hold up an M2 release, but I thought
I'd mention it.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On Nov 5, 2007 8:59 AM, Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My test cases, which admittedly are oriented towards Classic Cayenne
> (no JPA) worked fine.
>
> +1 to M2. Let me know if I can help with anything.
>
> Thanks,
>
> /dev/mrg
>
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2007 10:26 AM, Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com> wrote:
> > Fair enough. Michael et al., if you'd like to test it and be able to
> > cast your vote, I can hold off on posting anything until the start of
> > next week.
> >
> > --
> > Kevin
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
> > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 11:20 AM
> > To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
> >
> >
> > On Nov 2, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> >
> > > If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule
> > > of thumb
> > > to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri.
> >
> > Alternatively we keep doing it randomly, but let people request a
> > vote extension.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
My test cases, which admittedly are oriented towards Classic Cayenne
(no JPA) worked fine.
+1 to M2. Let me know if I can help with anything.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On Nov 2, 2007 10:26 AM, Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com> wrote:
> Fair enough. Michael et al., if you'd like to test it and be able to
> cast your vote, I can hold off on posting anything until the start of
> next week.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 11:20 AM
> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
>
> > If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule
> > of thumb
> > to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri.
>
> Alternatively we keep doing it randomly, but let people request a
> vote extension.
>
> Andrus
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
Fair enough. Michael et al., if you'd like to test it and be able to
cast your vote, I can hold off on posting anything until the start of
next week.
--
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrus Adamchik [mailto:andrus@objectstyle.org]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 11:20 AM
To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
On Nov 2, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule
> of thumb
> to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri.
Alternatively we keep doing it randomly, but let people request a
vote extension.
Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On Nov 2, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule
> of thumb
> to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri.
Alternatively we keep doing it randomly, but let people request a
vote extension.
Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
Heh. I thought I was helping out by doing it on a Monday. I figured that
way everyone had time during the week to do the testing and the release
could be posted by the end of the week. Also, for a purely selfish reason,
it's easier for me to take the necessary time to build the assemblies over
the weekends.
If weekends do work better in general though, we can make it a rule of thumb
to raise votes on Thurs. or Fri.
--
Kevin
On 11/2/07 9:57 AM, "Michael Gentry" <bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You should start these vote things on Thursdays or Fridays so some of
> us have a chance over a weekend to do testing. :-)
>
> /dev/mrg
>
>
> On 11/2/07, Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com> wrote:
>> The vote has been open for over 72 hours and we have the following results:
>>
>> -1: 0
>> 0: 0
>> +1: 4 (all binding)
>>
>> That indicates a successful vote for release. So, I guess the next step is
>> actually posting the artifacts and update the Web site.
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Michael Gentry <bl...@gmail.com>.
You should start these vote things on Thursdays or Fridays so some of
us have a chance over a weekend to do testing. :-)
/dev/mrg
On 11/2/07, Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com> wrote:
> The vote has been open for over 72 hours and we have the following results:
>
> -1: 0
> 0: 0
> +1: 4 (all binding)
>
> That indicates a successful vote for release. So, I guess the next step is
> actually posting the artifacts and update the Web site.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
The vote has been open for over 72 hours and we have the following results:
-1: 0
0: 0
+1: 4 (all binding)
That indicates a successful vote for release. So, I guess the next step is
actually posting the artifacts and update the Web site.
--
Kevin
[VOTE] Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
+1
(also changing the subject so that the VOTE is shown more prominently)
On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:28 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> Although likely implied, I'll make it explicit.
>
> +1
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
> On 10/29/07 1:56 PM, "Kevin Menard" <km...@servprise.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to raise the vote to release Cayenne 3.0 M2. This was
>> tagged a
>> couple weeks back, but has seen some bug fixes since then. Andrus
>> has
>> tested on several platforms with various DB engines. His results
>> were all
>> positive.
>>
>> I've built, signed, and posted assemblies here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M2/
>>
>> Note that I've built the Windows one, but did have a single test
>> failure.
>> Given that it was not observed on other platforms, it was likely an
>> environmental thing. I will try to look into it some more.
>>
>> Also, this is my first attempt at signing assemblies, so please
>> verify the
>> signatures.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kevin
>>
>
>
>
Re: 3.0 M2 Release Vote
Posted by Kevin Menard <km...@servprise.com>.
Although likely implied, I'll make it explicit.
+1
--
Kevin
On 10/29/07 1:56 PM, "Kevin Menard" <km...@servprise.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to raise the vote to release Cayenne 3.0 M2. This was tagged a
> couple weeks back, but has seen some bug fixes since then. Andrus has
> tested on several platforms with various DB engines. His results were all
> positive.
>
> I've built, signed, and posted assemblies here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~kmenard/release/3.0M2/
>
> Note that I've built the Windows one, but did have a single test failure.
> Given that it was not observed on other platforms, it was likely an
> environmental thing. I will try to look into it some more.
>
> Also, this is my first attempt at signing assemblies, so please verify the
> signatures.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>