You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de> on 2010/04/23 13:25:26 UTC

Re: svn commit: r937276 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:04:37PM -0000, gstein@apache.org wrote:
> Author: gstein
> Date: Fri Apr 23 13:04:37 2010
> New Revision: 937276

> This breaks schedule_tests 7, to be fixed in a larger and distinct
> semantic change/revision.

Why not mark it XFAIL in the meantime?

Stefan

Re: svn commit: r937276 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:25, Stefan Sperling <st...@elego.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:04:37PM -0000, gstein@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: gstein
>> Date: Fri Apr 23 13:04:37 2010
>> New Revision: 937276
>
>> This breaks schedule_tests 7, to be fixed in a larger and distinct
>> semantic change/revision.
>
> Why not mark it XFAIL in the meantime?

Cuz I planned to fix it in short order. Thus, churning the test script
would be just that... churn.

Cheers,
-g