[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #15933: Consider splitting Google Provider

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

potiuk commented on issue #15933:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15933#issuecomment-889802409


   Nope. The poll did not happen.
   
   But I agree we might want to split it. It's not a MUST, but It might be
   wise to do it. However if we are to split it we need to discuss and figure
   out what should be the best strategy (probably an "umbrella" provider that
   brings all sup-providers as dependencies to keep backwards compatibility.
   
   It also requires - I think - moving the sub-packages to their own
   sub-modules and keeping deprecation imports from sub-packages.
   
   Kurtqq - would you be willing to help with that if we start the effort?
   
   A number of things will have to be changed and it's a lot of
   semi-automated work to be done (we can likely automate some parts but a lot
   of it will be to manually move things).
   
   Who else would like to help with this if we decide to do it ?
   
   J.
   
   
   On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 10:28 AM Tzu-ping Chung ***@***.***>
   wrote:
   
   > Did the poll actually happen? (I wasn’t following closely and may have
   > missed it.)
   >
   > —
   > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > <https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15933#issuecomment-889730750>,
   > or unsubscribe
   > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAERMI4RW3EVFPPR54XOJQTT2JPEXANCNFSM45D4T6YA>
   > .
   >
   
   
   -- 
   +48 660 796 129
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org