You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net> on 2005/03/24 19:49:16 UTC
[VOTE] Reject tally of logo votes
It seems to me that it would be very sad and bad karma to have our logo under such a cloud of suspicion. So I would like to call a vote to reject this tally. I've heard lots of great ideas on how to resolve this issue either technologically or socially but I think first we need to establish that this tally is incorrect. Then if we agree to reject, ensuing discussions can determine how to best choose a logo.
> Logo 32 = 20 votes
> Logo 35 = 12 votes
> None of the above = 18 votes
Vote
+1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo is determined by the community.
-1 Not to reject the tally. Keep the vote tally as is with 32 as the winner.
Thanks
Kathey
Re: [VOTE] Reject tally of logo votes
Posted by "Lance J. Andersen" <La...@Sun.COM>.
+1
Kathey Marsden wrote:
>It seems to me that it would be very sad and bad karma to have our logo under such a cloud of suspicion. So I would like to call a vote to reject this tally. I've heard lots of great ideas on how to resolve this issue either technologically or socially but I think first we need to establish that this tally is incorrect. Then if we agree to reject, ensuing discussions can determine how to best choose a logo.
>
>
>
>>Logo 32 = 20 votes
>>Logo 35 = 12 votes
>>None of the above = 18 votes
>>
>>
>
>
>Vote
>+1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo is determined by the community.
>-1 Not to reject the tally. Keep the vote tally as is with 32 as the winner.
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Kathey
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Reject tally of logo votes
Posted by Jeffrey Lichtman <sw...@rcn.com>.
>+1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo is determined by the
>community.
- Jeff Lichtman
swazoo@rcn.com
Check out Swazoo Koolak's Web Jukebox at
http://swazoo.com/
Re: [VOTE] Reject tally of logo votes
Posted by myrna <my...@Golux.Com>.
+1
I would add, since even with the added suspicious votes, logo 32 only
had 2 more votes than 'none of the above, keep trying', we already have
our future direction...
Myrna
Kathey Marsden wrote:
>It seems to me that it would be very sad and bad karma to have our logo under such a cloud of suspicion. So I would like to call a vote to reject this tally. I've heard lots of great ideas on how to resolve this issue either technologically or socially but I think first we need to establish that this tally is incorrect. Then if we agree to reject, ensuing discussions can determine how to best choose a logo.
>
>
>
>>Logo 32 = 20 votes
>>Logo 35 = 12 votes
>>None of the above = 18 votes
>>
>>
>
>
>Vote
>+1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo is determined by the community.
>-1 Not to reject the tally. Keep the vote tally as is with 32 as the winner.
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Kathey
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Reject tally of logo votes
Posted by Jalud Abdulmenan <te...@rogers.com>.
+1 Reject the tally.
Jalud
Kathey Marsden wrote:
> Kathey Marsden wrote:
>
>
>>>Vote
>>>+1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo is determined by the community.
>>>-1 Not to reject the tally. Keep the vote tally as is with 32 as the winner.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> I need to abort this vote here and repost to derby-user. I posted to the
> wrong list.
> Sorry to all those who already voted. Please vote again with the same
> address! on derby-user.
>
> Thanks
>
> Kathey
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Reject tally of logo votes
Posted by Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>.
Kathey Marsden wrote:
>>Vote
>>+1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo is determined by the community.
>>-1 Not to reject the tally. Keep the vote tally as is with 32 as the winner.
>>
>>
>>
I need to abort this vote here and repost to derby-user. I posted to the
wrong list.
Sorry to all those who already voted. Please vote again with the same
address! on derby-user.
Thanks
Kathey
Re: [VOTE] Reject tally of logo votes
Posted by Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>.
>Vote
>+1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo is determined by the community.
>-1 Not to reject the tally. Keep the vote tally as is with 32 as the winner.
>
>
>
>
>
Oops forgot to vote
+1 Reject the tally. New method of choosing a logo is determined by the community.