You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> on 2015/01/14 17:47:29 UTC
Geronimo release request
Hi all,
I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS
2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with
this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance,
allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me know.
Kind regards
Martyn
[1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
[2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
Re: Geronimo release request
Posted by Salyh <he...@gmail.com>.
Javamail 1.4 is also ready for a alpha spec release IMHO
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 14.01.2015 um 18:29 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>
> AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
>
> BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
> batch release like last time?
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>:
>> Martyn,
>>
>> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer if
>> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a
>> release.
>>
>> John
>>
>>> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
>>>
>>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
>>> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS
>>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
>>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
>>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with
>>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
>>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance,
>>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
>>>
>>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me
>>> know.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Martyn
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
>>
Re: Geronimo release request
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
no blocker in my side excepted time so that's why I target the ~10th
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-01-28 13:58 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>:
> I was just wondering if the beginning of next month is still likely for an
> alpha release.
>
> On 28/01/15 12:23, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> on which point in particular? Didnt started anything yet (hopefully
>> next week, for sure the one after)
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-28 13:22 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>:
>>>
>>> Is there any update on this Romain?
>>>
>>> On 23/01/15 13:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months?
>>>>
>>>> I see:
>>>> -> jms 2 api
>>>> -> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?)
>>>> -> jta 1.2 api
>>>> -> jaxrs 2 api
>>>> -> ejb 3.2 api
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> All in alpha excepted current javamail version
>>>>
>>>> wdyt?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though
>>>>> would
>>>>> suffice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks gents
>>>>> Martyn
>>>>>
>>>>> On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
>>>>>> batch release like last time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Martyn,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd
>>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to
>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new
>>>>>>>> JMS
>>>>>>>> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss
>>>>>>>> JMS
>>>>>>>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
>>>>>>>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
>>>>>>>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP
>>>>>>>> clearance,
>>>>>>>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let
>>>>>>>> me
>>>>>>>> know.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>>>> Martyn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
>>>>>>>>
>
Re: Geronimo release request
Posted by Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>.
I was just wondering if the beginning of next month is still likely for
an alpha release.
On 28/01/15 12:23, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> on which point in particular? Didnt started anything yet (hopefully
> next week, for sure the one after)
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-01-28 13:22 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>:
>> Is there any update on this Romain?
>>
>> On 23/01/15 13:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months?
>>>
>>> I see:
>>> -> jms 2 api
>>> -> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?)
>>> -> jta 1.2 api
>>> -> jaxrs 2 api
>>> -> ejb 3.2 api
>>>
>>>
>>> All in alpha excepted current javamail version
>>>
>>> wdyt?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>:
>>>> I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would
>>>> suffice.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks gents
>>>> Martyn
>>>>
>>>> On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>> AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
>>>>> batch release like last time?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>> Martyn,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd
>>>>>> prefer
>>>>>> if
>>>>>> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> John
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
>>>>>>> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss
>>>>>>> JMS
>>>>>>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
>>>>>>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
>>>>>>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
>>>>>>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP
>>>>>>> clearance,
>>>>>>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me
>>>>>>> know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>>> Martyn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
>>>>>>>
Re: Geronimo release request
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
on which point in particular? Didnt started anything yet (hopefully
next week, for sure the one after)
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-01-28 13:22 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>:
> Is there any update on this Romain?
>
> On 23/01/15 13:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months?
>>
>> I see:
>> -> jms 2 api
>> -> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?)
>> -> jta 1.2 api
>> -> jaxrs 2 api
>> -> ejb 3.2 api
>>
>>
>> All in alpha excepted current javamail version
>>
>> wdyt?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>:
>>>
>>> I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would
>>> suffice.
>>>
>>> Thanks gents
>>> Martyn
>>>
>>> On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
>>>>
>>>> BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
>>>> batch release like last time?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Martyn,
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd
>>>>> prefer
>>>>> if
>>>>> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see
>>>>> a
>>>>> release.
>>>>>
>>>>> John
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
>>>>>> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss
>>>>>> JMS
>>>>>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
>>>>>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
>>>>>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
>>>>>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP
>>>>>> clearance,
>>>>>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me
>>>>>> know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>> Martyn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
>>>>>>
>
Re: Geronimo release request
Posted by Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>.
Is there any update on this Romain?
On 23/01/15 13:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months?
>
> I see:
> -> jms 2 api
> -> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?)
> -> jta 1.2 api
> -> jaxrs 2 api
> -> ejb 3.2 api
>
>
> All in alpha excepted current javamail version
>
> wdyt?
>
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>:
>> I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would
>> suffice.
>>
>> Thanks gents
>> Martyn
>>
>> On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
>>>
>>> BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
>>> batch release like last time?
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>:
>>>> Martyn,
>>>>
>>>> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer
>>>> if
>>>> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
>>>>> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS
>>>>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
>>>>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
>>>>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with
>>>>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
>>>>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance,
>>>>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me
>>>>> know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>> Martyn
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
>>>>>
Re: Geronimo release request
Posted by Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>.
Thanks Romain,
This sounds great.
A release beginning of next month would be ideal, as we are hoping to
consume an alpha in ActiveMQ6 to aid us get out of IP clearance and
propose an initial ActiveMQ6 release. Hopefully in the next couple of
weeks.
Regards
Martyn
On 23/01/15 13:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months?
>
> I see:
> -> jms 2 api
> -> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?)
> -> jta 1.2 api
> -> jaxrs 2 api
> -> ejb 3.2 api
>
>
> All in alpha excepted current javamail version
>
> wdyt?
>
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>:
>> I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would
>> suffice.
>>
>> Thanks gents
>> Martyn
>>
>> On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>> AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
>>>
>>> BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
>>> batch release like last time?
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>:
>>>> Martyn,
>>>>
>>>> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer
>>>> if
>>>> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
>>>>> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS
>>>>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
>>>>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
>>>>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with
>>>>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
>>>>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance,
>>>>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me
>>>>> know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>> Martyn
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
>>>>>
Re: Geronimo release request
Posted by Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com>.
i would like to release javamail as an alpha (or beta) version first
because we have not yet executed the TCK and the last changes are big
ones and its maybe to 100% stable (yet)
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months?
>
> I see:
> -> jms 2 api
> -> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?)
> -> jta 1.2 api
> -> jaxrs 2 api
> -> ejb 3.2 api
>
>
> All in alpha excepted current javamail version
>
> wdyt?
>
>
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>:
>> I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would
>> suffice.
>>
>> Thanks gents
>> Martyn
>>
>> On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>
>>> AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
>>>
>>> BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
>>> batch release like last time?
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Martyn,
>>>>
>>>> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer
>>>> if
>>>> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
>>>>> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS
>>>>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
>>>>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
>>>>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with
>>>>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
>>>>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance,
>>>>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
>>>>>
>>>>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me
>>>>> know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>> Martyn
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
>>>>>
>>
--
Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
@hendrikdev22
PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
Re: Geronimo release request
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning of next months?
I see:
-> jms 2 api
-> javamail (last 2 versions or too early for last one?)
-> jta 1.2 api
-> jaxrs 2 api
-> ejb 3.2 api
All in alpha excepted current javamail version
wdyt?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-01-15 16:35 GMT+01:00 Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>:
> I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would
> suffice.
>
> Thanks gents
> Martyn
>
> On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
>>
>> BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
>> batch release like last time?
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Martyn,
>>>
>>> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer
>>> if
>>> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a
>>> release.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
>>>>
>>>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
>>>> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS
>>>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
>>>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
>>>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with
>>>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
>>>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance,
>>>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
>>>>
>>>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me
>>>> know.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards
>>>> Martyn
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
>>>>
>
Re: Geronimo release request
Posted by Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com>.
I'm honestly don't know much about this either. An alpha-1 though would
suffice.
Thanks gents
Martyn
On 14/01/15 17:29, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
>
> BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
> batch release like last time?
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>:
>> Martyn,
>>
>> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer if
>> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a
>> release.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
>>>
>>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
>>> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS
>>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
>>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
>>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with
>>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
>>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance,
>>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
>>>
>>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me
>>> know.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>> Martyn
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
>>>
Re: Geronimo release request
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
AFAIK not yet so it would be a alpha-1 like others
BTW I have few other alpha-1 requests so maybe we could do a spec
batch release like last time?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2015-01-14 17:55 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>:
> Martyn,
>
> Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer if
> possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a
> release.
>
> John
>
> On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
>>
>> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
>> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS
>> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
>> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
>> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with
>> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
>> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance,
>> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
>>
>> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me
>> know.
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Martyn
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
>> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
>>
>
Re: Geronimo release request
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
Martyn,
Do you know if the ASF has been able to secure the JMS 2 TCK? I'd prefer if
possible to run the TCK at least once prior to saying I'm happy to see a
release.
John
On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 11:48:47 AM Martyn Taylor <mt...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to request a new release of Geronimo.
>
> One of the recent additions to the geronimo-specs project is a new JMS
> 2.0 spec jar[1]. We have swapped out a legacy dependency on a JBoss JMS
> 2.0 spec jar with a snapshot build of geronimo-spec jms 2.0 as part of
> the IP Clearance process of the ActiveMQ6[2] project. The ActiveMQ6
> test suite is currently passing against our JMS 2.0 implementation with
> this new Geronimo JMS 2.0 snapshot jar in place. We are hoping to
> utilize an official release of this jar to get us through IP clearance,
> allowing us to start thinking about an initial ActiveMQ6 release.
>
> If there is anything I can do to help with this process, please let me
> know.
>
> Kind regards
> Martyn
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/2
> [2] https://github.com/apache/activemq-6
>
>