You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tez.apache.org by Siddharth Seth <ss...@apache.org> on 2017/02/02 02:17:34 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
This would be the right time to get rid of deprecated methods. I suspect
we'll need to look at them on a case by case basis though. Do you have a
list of these?
Anyone else has thoughts on releases?
Thanks,
Sid
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1.
>
> On release schedule, we could consider getting onto a time based release
> schedule - e.g. a release every 4 months so there is a regular cadence of
> bug fix releases at least.
>
> Should we remove any deprecations since 0.7 in 0.9 given a couple of
> releases have passed?
>
> Bikas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 1:37 PM
> To: dev@tez.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
>
> There hasn't been any release for some time.
>
> 0.8 - I'd like to create a new release in the next 2 weeks. There's quite
> a few bug fixes. TEZ-3244 would be a good candidate to get in so that
> there's a consumable build.
>
> 0.9 - Already has changes for Fair custom data routing, Cartesian product,
> quite a few UI enhancements. Two big items under development are the
> Parallel edge between vertices and the Tez shuffle handler. Would like to
> get thoughts on a release schedule for 0.9.
> We could create a beta with the 2 pending items missing, and a non-beta
> once the remaining 2 features go in (or by time).
> Alternately, create a non-beta release around mid-end March - with
> whichever features are available.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Sid
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
Posted by Siddharth Seth <ss...@apache.org>.
Any volunteers to take up the deprecation hunt?
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
> That’s a good idea. Though we (at least I) don’t know enough about those
> code bases to determine if an API upgrade is a lot or little work in there.
> My gut feeling is that we will find everyone is still using deprecated
> API's :)
>
> Bikas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Eagles [mailto:jeagles@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 12:34 PM
> To: dev@tez.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
>
> Can we do a cursory glance at deprecated APIs and how they are used in
> know Tez application (pig, hive, cascading)? This will save us some time in
> knowing if something has broken.
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I would say to look for all deprecations tags and remove them in 0.9.0
> > :)
> >
> > If someone complains (ideally during the RC) then they have time to
> > upgrade because they now know about it. Or we could consider relaxing
> > a few if really needed.
> >
> > Bikas
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 6:18 PM
> > To: dev@tez.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
> >
> > This would be the right time to get rid of deprecated methods. I
> > suspect we'll need to look at them on a case by case basis though. Do
> > you have a list of these?
> >
> > Anyone else has thoughts on releases?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sid
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1.
> > >
> > > On release schedule, we could consider getting onto a time based
> > > release schedule - e.g. a release every 4 months so there is a
> > > regular cadence of bug fix releases at least.
> > >
> > > Should we remove any deprecations since 0.7 in 0.9 given a couple of
> > > releases have passed?
> > >
> > > Bikas
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 1:37 PM
> > > To: dev@tez.apache.org
> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
> > >
> > > There hasn't been any release for some time.
> > >
> > > 0.8 - I'd like to create a new release in the next 2 weeks. There's
> > > quite a few bug fixes. TEZ-3244 would be a good candidate to get in
> > > so that there's a consumable build.
> > >
> > > 0.9 - Already has changes for Fair custom data routing, Cartesian
> > > product, quite a few UI enhancements. Two big items under
> > > development are the Parallel edge between vertices and the Tez shuffle
> handler.
> > > Would like to get thoughts on a release schedule for 0.9.
> > > We could create a beta with the 2 pending items missing, and a
> > > non-beta once the remaining 2 features go in (or by time).
> > > Alternately, create a non-beta release around mid-end March - with
> > > whichever features are available.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Sid
> > >
> >
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
Posted by Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org>.
That’s a good idea. Though we (at least I) don’t know enough about those code bases to determine if an API upgrade is a lot or little work in there. My gut feeling is that we will find everyone is still using deprecated API's :)
Bikas
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Eagles [mailto:jeagles@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 12:34 PM
To: dev@tez.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
Can we do a cursory glance at deprecated APIs and how they are used in know Tez application (pig, hive, cascading)? This will save us some time in knowing if something has broken.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
> I would say to look for all deprecations tags and remove them in 0.9.0
> :)
>
> If someone complains (ideally during the RC) then they have time to
> upgrade because they now know about it. Or we could consider relaxing
> a few if really needed.
>
> Bikas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 6:18 PM
> To: dev@tez.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
>
> This would be the right time to get rid of deprecated methods. I
> suspect we'll need to look at them on a case by case basis though. Do
> you have a list of these?
>
> Anyone else has thoughts on releases?
>
> Thanks,
> Sid
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1.
> >
> > On release schedule, we could consider getting onto a time based
> > release schedule - e.g. a release every 4 months so there is a
> > regular cadence of bug fix releases at least.
> >
> > Should we remove any deprecations since 0.7 in 0.9 given a couple of
> > releases have passed?
> >
> > Bikas
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 1:37 PM
> > To: dev@tez.apache.org
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
> >
> > There hasn't been any release for some time.
> >
> > 0.8 - I'd like to create a new release in the next 2 weeks. There's
> > quite a few bug fixes. TEZ-3244 would be a good candidate to get in
> > so that there's a consumable build.
> >
> > 0.9 - Already has changes for Fair custom data routing, Cartesian
> > product, quite a few UI enhancements. Two big items under
> > development are the Parallel edge between vertices and the Tez shuffle handler.
> > Would like to get thoughts on a release schedule for 0.9.
> > We could create a beta with the 2 pending items missing, and a
> > non-beta once the remaining 2 features go in (or by time).
> > Alternately, create a non-beta release around mid-end March - with
> > whichever features are available.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sid
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
Posted by Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>.
Can we do a cursory glance at deprecated APIs and how they are used in know
Tez application (pig, hive, cascading)? This will save us some time in
knowing if something has broken.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
> I would say to look for all deprecations tags and remove them in 0.9.0 :)
>
> If someone complains (ideally during the RC) then they have time to
> upgrade because they now know about it. Or we could consider relaxing a few
> if really needed.
>
> Bikas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 6:18 PM
> To: dev@tez.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
>
> This would be the right time to get rid of deprecated methods. I suspect
> we'll need to look at them on a case by case basis though. Do you have a
> list of these?
>
> Anyone else has thoughts on releases?
>
> Thanks,
> Sid
>
> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1.
> >
> > On release schedule, we could consider getting onto a time based
> > release schedule - e.g. a release every 4 months so there is a regular
> > cadence of bug fix releases at least.
> >
> > Should we remove any deprecations since 0.7 in 0.9 given a couple of
> > releases have passed?
> >
> > Bikas
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 1:37 PM
> > To: dev@tez.apache.org
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
> >
> > There hasn't been any release for some time.
> >
> > 0.8 - I'd like to create a new release in the next 2 weeks. There's
> > quite a few bug fixes. TEZ-3244 would be a good candidate to get in so
> > that there's a consumable build.
> >
> > 0.9 - Already has changes for Fair custom data routing, Cartesian
> > product, quite a few UI enhancements. Two big items under development
> > are the Parallel edge between vertices and the Tez shuffle handler.
> > Would like to get thoughts on a release schedule for 0.9.
> > We could create a beta with the 2 pending items missing, and a
> > non-beta once the remaining 2 features go in (or by time).
> > Alternately, create a non-beta release around mid-end March - with
> > whichever features are available.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sid
> >
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
Posted by Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org>.
I would say to look for all deprecations tags and remove them in 0.9.0 :)
If someone complains (ideally during the RC) then they have time to upgrade because they now know about it. Or we could consider relaxing a few if really needed.
Bikas
-----Original Message-----
From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 6:18 PM
To: dev@tez.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
This would be the right time to get rid of deprecated methods. I suspect we'll need to look at them on a case by case basis though. Do you have a list of these?
Anyone else has thoughts on releases?
Thanks,
Sid
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1.
>
> On release schedule, we could consider getting onto a time based
> release schedule - e.g. a release every 4 months so there is a regular
> cadence of bug fix releases at least.
>
> Should we remove any deprecations since 0.7 in 0.9 given a couple of
> releases have passed?
>
> Bikas
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Siddharth Seth [mailto:sseth@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2017 1:37 PM
> To: dev@tez.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Releases - 0.8/0.9
>
> There hasn't been any release for some time.
>
> 0.8 - I'd like to create a new release in the next 2 weeks. There's
> quite a few bug fixes. TEZ-3244 would be a good candidate to get in so
> that there's a consumable build.
>
> 0.9 - Already has changes for Fair custom data routing, Cartesian
> product, quite a few UI enhancements. Two big items under development
> are the Parallel edge between vertices and the Tez shuffle handler.
> Would like to get thoughts on a release schedule for 0.9.
> We could create a beta with the 2 pending items missing, and a
> non-beta once the remaining 2 features go in (or by time).
> Alternately, create a non-beta release around mid-end March - with
> whichever features are available.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Sid
>