You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cassandra.apache.org by Jaakko <ro...@gmail.com> on 2009/12/04 11:47:49 UTC
gossip documentation
Hi,
Just wrote part of Gossip documentation. Before finishing this, I'd
like to hear opinions on is this level of documentation too detailed
or suitable? Any other comments/ideas are of course also very welcome!
-Jaakko
Re: gossip documentation
Posted by Jaakko <ro...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, you're right it is too detailed for an introduction. I'll improve it.
Thanks,
-Jaakko
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Some of it is pretty low-level -- we might be better served moving
> some into comments / docstrings and keeping the wiki oriented towards
> overview. What do you think?
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Jaakko <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just wrote part of Gossip documentation. Before finishing this, I'd
>> like to hear opinions on is this level of documentation too detailed
>> or suitable? Any other comments/ideas are of course also very welcome!
>>
>> -Jaakko
>>
>
Re: gossip documentation
Posted by Jonathan Ellis <jb...@gmail.com>.
Some of it is pretty low-level -- we might be better served moving
some into comments / docstrings and keeping the wiki oriented towards
overview. What do you think?
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Jaakko <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wrote part of Gossip documentation. Before finishing this, I'd
> like to hear opinions on is this level of documentation too detailed
> or suitable? Any other comments/ideas are of course also very welcome!
>
> -Jaakko
>
Re: gossip documentation
Posted by Jaakko <ro...@gmail.com>.
> Referring to: http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/ArchitectureGossip
Ah, yes, Thank You. Sorry about forgetting the URL :(
-J
Re: gossip documentation
Posted by Jonathan Ellis <jb...@gmail.com>.
Referring to: http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/ArchitectureGossip
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Jaakko <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wrote part of Gossip documentation. Before finishing this, I'd
> like to hear opinions on is this level of documentation too detailed
> or suitable? Any other comments/ideas are of course also very welcome!
>
> -Jaakko
>