You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Giovanni Bricconi <gi...@banzai.it> on 2013/10/16 16:24:44 UTC

howto increase indexing speed?

I have a small solr setup, not even on a physical machine but a vmware
virtual machine with a single cpu that reads data using DIH from a
database. The machine has no phisical disks attached but stores data on a
netapp nas.

Currently this machine indexes 320 documents/sec, not bad but we plan to
double the index and we would like to keep nearly the same.

Doing some basic checks during the indexing I have found with iostat that
the usage of the disks is nearly 8% and the source database is running
fine, instead the  virtual cpu is 95% running on solr.

Now I can quite easily add another virtual cpu to the solr box, but as far
as I know this won't help because DIH doesn't work in parallel. Am I wrong?

What would you do? Rewrite the feeding process quitting dih and using solrj
to feed data in parallel? Would you instead keep DIH and switch to a
sharded configuration?

Thank you for any hints

Giovanni

Re: howto increase indexing speed?

Posted by Walter Underwood <wu...@wunderwood.org>.
You might consider local disks. I once ran Solr with the indexes on an NFS-mounted volume and the slowdown was severe.

wunder

On Oct 16, 2013, at 7:40 AM, primoz.skale@policija.si wrote:

> I think DIH uses only one core per instance. IMHO 300 doc/sec is quite 
> good. If you would like to use more cores you need to use solrj. Or maybe 
> more than one DIH and more cores of course.
> 
> Primoz
> 
> 
> 
> From:   Giovanni Bricconi <gi...@banzai.it>
> To:     solr-user <so...@lucene.apache.org>
> Date:   16.10.2013 16:25
> Subject:        howto increase indexing speed?
> 
> 
> 
> I have a small solr setup, not even on a physical machine but a vmware
> virtual machine with a single cpu that reads data using DIH from a
> database. The machine has no phisical disks attached but stores data on a
> netapp nas.
> 
> Currently this machine indexes 320 documents/sec, not bad but we plan to
> double the index and we would like to keep nearly the same.
> 
> Doing some basic checks during the indexing I have found with iostat that
> the usage of the disks is nearly 8% and the source database is running
> fine, instead the  virtual cpu is 95% running on solr.
> 
> Now I can quite easily add another virtual cpu to the solr box, but as far
> as I know this won't help because DIH doesn't work in parallel. Am I 
> wrong?
> 
> What would you do? Rewrite the feeding process quitting dih and using 
> solrj
> to feed data in parallel? Would you instead keep DIH and switch to a
> sharded configuration?
> 
> Thank you for any hints
> 
> Giovanni
> 

--
Walter Underwood
wunder@wunderwood.org




Re: howto increase indexing speed?

Posted by pr...@policija.si.
I think DIH uses only one core per instance. IMHO 300 doc/sec is quite 
good. If you would like to use more cores you need to use solrj. Or maybe 
more than one DIH and more cores of course.

Primoz



From:   Giovanni Bricconi <gi...@banzai.it>
To:     solr-user <so...@lucene.apache.org>
Date:   16.10.2013 16:25
Subject:        howto increase indexing speed?



I have a small solr setup, not even on a physical machine but a vmware
virtual machine with a single cpu that reads data using DIH from a
database. The machine has no phisical disks attached but stores data on a
netapp nas.

Currently this machine indexes 320 documents/sec, not bad but we plan to
double the index and we would like to keep nearly the same.

Doing some basic checks during the indexing I have found with iostat that
the usage of the disks is nearly 8% and the source database is running
fine, instead the  virtual cpu is 95% running on solr.

Now I can quite easily add another virtual cpu to the solr box, but as far
as I know this won't help because DIH doesn't work in parallel. Am I 
wrong?

What would you do? Rewrite the feeding process quitting dih and using 
solrj
to feed data in parallel? Would you instead keep DIH and switch to a
sharded configuration?

Thank you for any hints

Giovanni