You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "Hasan Muhammad (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org> on 2007/02/01 14:44:06 UTC
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1086) Scope defined java
serialiazation/deserialization of SDO
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12469427 ]
Hasan Muhammad commented on TUSCANY-1086:
-----------------------------------------
Frank,
Would you want the same for an ObjectOutputStream (i.e. scope defined ) ? I was wondering why would anyone want to have a scope on both, since if at all one wanted to use the same scope for serialization/deserializaton, then they would use the global scope.. But still, wanted to ask if you thought we needed a scope defined ObjectOutputStream as well ?
BTW, i am creating a new class called SDOObjectInputStream under org.apache.tuscany.sdo.util.resource, just a placeHolder for the scope. This would be returned by the create method.
Hasan
> Scope defined java serialiazation/deserialization of SDO
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-1086
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1086
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java SDO Implementation
> Affects Versions: Java-M2
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Hasan Muhammad
>
> Need to have a scope defined java serialization/deserialization of SDO's. Currently it can be done only in the Global/default scope. Have to fix this by using helperContext as the scope for creating ObjectInputStream and ObjectOutputStream.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org