You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@wicket.apache.org by "Igor Vaynberg (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/02/20 02:38:46 UTC
[jira] Commented: (WICKET-1358) Make Application Class More
Bean-ish
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12570533#action_12570533 ]
Igor Vaynberg commented on WICKET-1358:
---------------------------------------
a lot of core devs will be on a mini vacation in thailand for the next couple of weeks so we wont be able to get to this for a whle. just a heads up. ping the list again in a couple of weeks.
> Make Application Class More Bean-ish
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: WICKET-1358
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1358
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: wicket
> Affects Versions: 1.3.1
> Reporter: James Carman
> Attachments: WICKET-1358.patch
>
>
> The Application class has getters for properties like applicationSettings and securitySettings. Couldn't we make those properties writable also? I realize that the internal implementation might have to change a bit. Currently, the Settings class implements all of those interfaces and it uses a single instance of Settings by default. The reason that I want this is so that I can set up my Application object in Spring and access it via wicket-spring. The current implementation of Application doesn't facilitate the "set up" part very well.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.