You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> on 2020/01/14 21:18:59 UTC
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release candidate; the more eyes the better.
Changed subject Line.
--Andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can test tomorrow.
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already have
> > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available in
> > staging:
> >
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> >
> > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> have
> > not tested /bin/mahout.
> >
> > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> >
> > For testing, lease do the following:
> > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> >
> > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> >
> > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
No Prob as far as running the release. Yeah sorry about the timing you told me you were busy too, Andrew. I thought we were going to have more issues to clean up. From this run though I think we have a viable candidate. Since so much of the overhaul of the poms was in the actual releasing I was not paying so much attention to peoples schedules. Next time will make sure to coo-ordinate.
I think that my pom skills may have actually diminished after working with this release :) It is slightly hacky, but i think that we should consider any further overhaul as a team, I already had to make some changes to the ~/.m2/settings.xml of the release master, documented on the mvn site, this may be more than we want. I have the steps documented, and will update the how-to-release.md page. and sart a jira for the new settings as well.
tl;dr, any further work on poms IMO should be a new design plan.
Release artifact URL (scala 2.11, 2.12): https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/<https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2F&v=3>
--andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 1:17 AM
To: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Cc: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
I think 72 hours is a guideline but can check; my apologies but I also got too busy with work and family to take a good look.
If we have the right URL for artifacts we can shoot for a vote this weekend.
Thanks for running the release Andy!
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 21:35 Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>> wrote:
As a reminder to all. I cut this RC at a bad point for most to test. (Rawkintrevo had a vacation and others mentioned offline being very busy. We discussed offline leaving the vote open for more than 72 hours. but I am happy to close it and re open when it is not Announced bad timing. or in voilation of Apache release rules (might be)... Please let me know.
Maybe we can co-ordinate at next weekly meeting when Trevor's back? It seemed like a good amount were ready to participate in weelky meetings last week.
(I also supplied incorrect artifact name in release.. My first time acting as release manager.)
Happy to coordinate a better time for testing and cut a new RC if need be.
Whatever's good.
--Andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>>
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2020 7:19 PM
To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>>; dev@mahout.apache.org<ma...@mahout.apache.org> <de...@mahout.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Resolved artifacts for a test application. Built and tested. There is a duplicate source release however, I believe that this is trivial and can be dealt with in a readme or not at all (it is a default artifact from the maven release plugin).
+1 (binding)
On Jan 16, 2020 10:50 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>> wrote:
I looked back over the release docs, and the link I was supposed to send out out was this: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/<https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2F&v=3>
I was able to successfully resolve all artifacts with this link in a spark application.
please use this URL for to test the staged artifacts.
Thank you,
--andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 5:01 PM
To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>>; dev@mahout.apache.org<ma...@mahout.apache.org> <de...@mahout.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Apologies, I'd not closed the staging repository, and sent out the wrong link In the initial email. the correct staging link is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/<https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/%3Chttps://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3>>
--andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 4:18 PM
To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>>; dev@mahout.apache.org<ma...@mahout.apache.org> <de...@mahout.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release candidate; the more eyes the better.
Changed subject Line.
--Andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org<ma...@mahout.apache.org> <de...@mahout.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I can test tomorrow.
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already have
> > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available in
> > staging:
> >
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> >
> > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> have
> > not tested /bin/mahout.
> >
> > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> >
> > For testing, lease do the following:
> > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> >
> > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> >
> > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
Ah cool perfect- thanks Joe. -- Yes this is the document that i was thinking about so we're good It looks like.
So we can take our time on it.
Thanks alot!
--andy
________________________________
From: Joey Frazee <jo...@icloud.com.INVALID>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 12:13 PM
To: Mahout Dev List <de...@mahout.apache.org>; dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
I’ve seen this come up on a lot of lists. I wonder if it needs clarified. Release policy says "Release votes SHOULD remain open for *at least* 72 hours” [1] (emphasis on 'at least' mine). So going longer is 100% OK, and going shorter could even be justified in weird circumstances (security issue?).
Also, I don’t think any smaller projects interpret not passing in 72 hours as meaning the vote failed.
-joey
1. https://apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
On Jan 21, 2020, 4:55 AM -0600, Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> I think 72 hours is the _minimum_.
>
> I came back late last night so I could have today for laundry, cleaning,
> and other catch-up-on-life stuff, which would include testing the RC.
>
> Tg
>
>
> On Jan 21, 2020 12:17 AM, "Andrew Musselman" <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I think 72 hours is a guideline but can check; my apologies but I also got
> too busy with work and family to take a good look.
>
> If we have the right URL for artifacts we can shoot for a vote this weekend.
>
> Thanks for running the release Andy!
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 21:35 Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> > As a reminder to all. I cut this RC at a bad point for most to test.
> > (Rawkintrevo had a vacation and others mentioned offline being very busy.
> > We discussed offline leaving the vote open for more than 72 hours. but I
> am
> > happy to close it and re open when it is not Announced bad timing. or in
> > voilation of Apache release rules (might be)... Please let me know.
> >
> > Maybe we can co-ordinate at next weekly meeting when Trevor's back? It
> > seemed like a good amount were ready to participate in weelky meetings
> last
> > week.
> >
> > (I also supplied incorrect artifact name in release.. My first time acting
> > as release manager.)
> >
> > Happy to coordinate a better time for testing and cut a new RC if need be.
> >
> > Whatever's good.
> >
> > --Andy
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > *Sent:* Saturday, January 18, 2020 7:19 PM
> >
> > *To:* Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org
> > <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> >
> > Resolved artifacts for a test application. Built and tested. There is a
> > duplicate source release however, I believe that this is trivial and can
> be
> > dealt with in a readme or not at all (it is a default artifact from the
> > maven release plugin).
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Jan 16, 2020 10:50 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >
> > I looked back over the release docs, and the link I was supposed to send
> > out out was this:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/
> > <
> https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2F&v=3
> >
> >
> > I was able to successfully resolve all artifacts with this link in a
> > spark application.
> >
> > please use this URL for to test the staged artifacts.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > --andy
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2020 5:01 PM
> > *To:* Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org
> > <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> >
> > Apologies, I'd not closed the staging repository, and sent out the wrong
> > link In the initial email. the correct staging link is here:
> >
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/
> <
> https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3
> > <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/%3Chttps://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3
> >
>
> > >
> >
> > --andy
> > ________________________________
> > From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 4:18 PM
> > To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <
> > dev@mahout.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
> >
> > This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release
> > candidate; the more eyes the better.
> >
> > Changed subject Line.
> >
> > --Andy
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
> >
> > I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I can test tomorrow.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already
> > have
> > > > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available
> > in
> > > > staging:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> > > >
> > > > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> > > have
> > > > not tested /bin/mahout.
> > > >
> > > > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> > > >
> > > > For testing, lease do the following:
> > > > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > > > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > > > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > > > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> > > >
> > > > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > > > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> > > >
> > > > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > > > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > >
> > > > Andy
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Posted by Joey Frazee <jo...@icloud.com.INVALID>.
I’ve seen this come up on a lot of lists. I wonder if it needs clarified. Release policy says "Release votes SHOULD remain open for *at least* 72 hours” [1] (emphasis on 'at least' mine). So going longer is 100% OK, and going shorter could even be justified in weird circumstances (security issue?).
Also, I don’t think any smaller projects interpret not passing in 72 hours as meaning the vote failed.
-joey
1. https://apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
On Jan 21, 2020, 4:55 AM -0600, Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>, wrote:
> I think 72 hours is the _minimum_.
>
> I came back late last night so I could have today for laundry, cleaning,
> and other catch-up-on-life stuff, which would include testing the RC.
>
> Tg
>
>
> On Jan 21, 2020 12:17 AM, "Andrew Musselman" <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I think 72 hours is a guideline but can check; my apologies but I also got
> too busy with work and family to take a good look.
>
> If we have the right URL for artifacts we can shoot for a vote this weekend.
>
> Thanks for running the release Andy!
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 21:35 Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> > As a reminder to all. I cut this RC at a bad point for most to test.
> > (Rawkintrevo had a vacation and others mentioned offline being very busy.
> > We discussed offline leaving the vote open for more than 72 hours. but I
> am
> > happy to close it and re open when it is not Announced bad timing. or in
> > voilation of Apache release rules (might be)... Please let me know.
> >
> > Maybe we can co-ordinate at next weekly meeting when Trevor's back? It
> > seemed like a good amount were ready to participate in weelky meetings
> last
> > week.
> >
> > (I also supplied incorrect artifact name in release.. My first time acting
> > as release manager.)
> >
> > Happy to coordinate a better time for testing and cut a new RC if need be.
> >
> > Whatever's good.
> >
> > --Andy
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > *Sent:* Saturday, January 18, 2020 7:19 PM
> >
> > *To:* Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org
> > <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> >
> > Resolved artifacts for a test application. Built and tested. There is a
> > duplicate source release however, I believe that this is trivial and can
> be
> > dealt with in a readme or not at all (it is a default artifact from the
> > maven release plugin).
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Jan 16, 2020 10:50 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> >
> > I looked back over the release docs, and the link I was supposed to send
> > out out was this:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/
> > <
> https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2F&v=3
> >
> >
> > I was able to successfully resolve all artifacts with this link in a
> > spark application.
> >
> > please use this URL for to test the staged artifacts.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > --andy
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2020 5:01 PM
> > *To:* Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org
> > <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> > *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> >
> > Apologies, I'd not closed the staging repository, and sent out the wrong
> > link In the initial email. the correct staging link is here:
> >
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/
> <
> https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3
> > <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/%3Chttps://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3
> >
>
> > >
> >
> > --andy
> > ________________________________
> > From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 4:18 PM
> > To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <
> > dev@mahout.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
> >
> > This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release
> > candidate; the more eyes the better.
> >
> > Changed subject Line.
> >
> > --Andy
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
> >
> > I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I can test tomorrow.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already
> > have
> > > > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available
> > in
> > > > staging:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> > > >
> > > > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> > > have
> > > > not tested /bin/mahout.
> > > >
> > > > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> > > >
> > > > For testing, lease do the following:
> > > > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > > > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > > > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > > > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> > > >
> > > > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > > > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> > > >
> > > > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > > > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > >
> > > > Andy
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
no rush here.. Andrew is busy till weekend, it looks like and Joe confirmed. the minimum.. I have the RC process for this release down to about 45 mins so can easily cut a new one any time anyways.
________________________________
From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 5:54 AM
To: Mahout Dev List <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
I think 72 hours is the _minimum_.
I came back late last night so I could have today for laundry, cleaning,
and other catch-up-on-life stuff, which would include testing the RC.
Tg
On Jan 21, 2020 12:17 AM, "Andrew Musselman" <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I think 72 hours is a guideline but can check; my apologies but I also got
too busy with work and family to take a good look.
If we have the right URL for artifacts we can shoot for a vote this weekend.
Thanks for running the release Andy!
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 21:35 Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> As a reminder to all. I cut this RC at a bad point for most to test.
> (Rawkintrevo had a vacation and others mentioned offline being very busy.
> We discussed offline leaving the vote open for more than 72 hours. but I
am
> happy to close it and re open when it is not Announced bad timing. or in
> voilation of Apache release rules (might be)... Please let me know.
>
> Maybe we can co-ordinate at next weekly meeting when Trevor's back? It
> seemed like a good amount were ready to participate in weelky meetings
last
> week.
>
> (I also supplied incorrect artifact name in release.. My first time acting
> as release manager.)
>
> Happy to coordinate a better time for testing and cut a new RC if need be.
>
> Whatever's good.
>
> --Andy
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 18, 2020 7:19 PM
>
> *To:* Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org
> <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> Resolved artifacts for a test application. Built and tested. There is a
> duplicate source release however, I believe that this is trivial and can
be
> dealt with in a readme or not at all (it is a default artifact from the
> maven release plugin).
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Jan 16, 2020 10:50 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> I looked back over the release docs, and the link I was supposed to send
> out out was this:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/
> <
https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2F&v=3
>
>
> I was able to successfully resolve all artifacts with this link in a
> spark application.
>
> please use this URL for to test the staged artifacts.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --andy
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2020 5:01 PM
> *To:* Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org
> <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> Apologies, I'd not closed the staging repository, and sent out the wrong
> link In the initial email. the correct staging link is here:
>
>
>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/
<
https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3
> <
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/%3Chttps://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3
>
> >
>
> --andy
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 4:18 PM
> To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <
> dev@mahout.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release
> candidate; the more eyes the better.
>
> Changed subject Line.
>
> --Andy
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
>
> I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I can test tomorrow.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already
> have
> > > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available
> in
> > > staging:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> > >
> > > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> > have
> > > not tested /bin/mahout.
> > >
> > > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> > >
> > > For testing, lease do the following:
> > > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> > >
> > > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> > >
> > > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Posted by Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>.
I think 72 hours is the _minimum_.
I came back late last night so I could have today for laundry, cleaning,
and other catch-up-on-life stuff, which would include testing the RC.
Tg
On Jan 21, 2020 12:17 AM, "Andrew Musselman" <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I think 72 hours is a guideline but can check; my apologies but I also got
too busy with work and family to take a good look.
If we have the right URL for artifacts we can shoot for a vote this weekend.
Thanks for running the release Andy!
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 21:35 Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> As a reminder to all. I cut this RC at a bad point for most to test.
> (Rawkintrevo had a vacation and others mentioned offline being very busy.
> We discussed offline leaving the vote open for more than 72 hours. but I
am
> happy to close it and re open when it is not Announced bad timing. or in
> voilation of Apache release rules (might be)... Please let me know.
>
> Maybe we can co-ordinate at next weekly meeting when Trevor's back? It
> seemed like a good amount were ready to participate in weelky meetings
last
> week.
>
> (I also supplied incorrect artifact name in release.. My first time acting
> as release manager.)
>
> Happy to coordinate a better time for testing and cut a new RC if need be.
>
> Whatever's good.
>
> --Andy
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 18, 2020 7:19 PM
>
> *To:* Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org
> <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> Resolved artifacts for a test application. Built and tested. There is a
> duplicate source release however, I believe that this is trivial and can
be
> dealt with in a readme or not at all (it is a default artifact from the
> maven release plugin).
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Jan 16, 2020 10:50 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> I looked back over the release docs, and the link I was supposed to send
> out out was this:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/
> <
https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2F&v=3
>
>
> I was able to successfully resolve all artifacts with this link in a
> spark application.
>
> please use this URL for to test the staged artifacts.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --andy
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2020 5:01 PM
> *To:* Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org
> <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> Apologies, I'd not closed the staging repository, and sent out the wrong
> link In the initial email. the correct staging link is here:
>
>
>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/
<
https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3
> <
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/%3Chttps://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3
>
> >
>
> --andy
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 4:18 PM
> To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <
> dev@mahout.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release
> candidate; the more eyes the better.
>
> Changed subject Line.
>
> --Andy
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
>
> I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I can test tomorrow.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already
> have
> > > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available
> in
> > > staging:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> > >
> > > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> > have
> > > not tested /bin/mahout.
> > >
> > > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> > >
> > > For testing, lease do the following:
> > > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> > >
> > > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> > >
> > > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
I think 72 hours is a guideline but can check; my apologies but I also got
too busy with work and family to take a good look.
If we have the right URL for artifacts we can shoot for a vote this weekend.
Thanks for running the release Andy!
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 21:35 Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> As a reminder to all. I cut this RC at a bad point for most to test.
> (Rawkintrevo had a vacation and others mentioned offline being very busy.
> We discussed offline leaving the vote open for more than 72 hours. but I am
> happy to close it and re open when it is not Announced bad timing. or in
> voilation of Apache release rules (might be)... Please let me know.
>
> Maybe we can co-ordinate at next weekly meeting when Trevor's back? It
> seemed like a good amount were ready to participate in weelky meetings last
> week.
>
> (I also supplied incorrect artifact name in release.. My first time acting
> as release manager.)
>
> Happy to coordinate a better time for testing and cut a new RC if need be.
>
> Whatever's good.
>
> --Andy
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> *Sent:* Saturday, January 18, 2020 7:19 PM
>
> *To:* Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org
> <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> Resolved artifacts for a test application. Built and tested. There is a
> duplicate source release however, I believe that this is trivial and can be
> dealt with in a readme or not at all (it is a default artifact from the
> maven release plugin).
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Jan 16, 2020 10:50 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> I looked back over the release docs, and the link I was supposed to send
> out out was this:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/
> <https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2F&v=3>
>
> I was able to successfully resolve all artifacts with this link in a
> spark application.
>
> please use this URL for to test the staged artifacts.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --andy
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 15, 2020 5:01 PM
> *To:* Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org
> <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> Apologies, I'd not closed the staging repository, and sent out the wrong
> link In the initial email. the correct staging link is here:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/<https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/%3Chttps://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3>
> >
>
> --andy
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 4:18 PM
> To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <
> dev@mahout.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
>
> This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release
> candidate; the more eyes the better.
>
> Changed subject Line.
>
> --Andy
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
>
> I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I can test tomorrow.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already
> have
> > > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available
> in
> > > staging:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> > >
> > > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> > have
> > > not tested /bin/mahout.
> > >
> > > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> > >
> > > For testing, lease do the following:
> > > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> > >
> > > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> > >
> > > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
As a reminder to all. I cut this RC at a bad point for most to test. (Rawkintrevo had a vacation and others mentioned offline being very busy. We discussed offline leaving the vote open for more than 72 hours. but I am happy to close it and re open when it is not Announced bad timing. or in voilation of Apache release rules (might be)... Please let me know.
Maybe we can co-ordinate at next weekly meeting when Trevor's back? It seemed like a good amount were ready to participate in weelky meetings last week.
(I also supplied incorrect artifact name in release.. My first time acting as release manager.)
Happy to coordinate a better time for testing and cut a new RC if need be.
Whatever's good.
--Andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2020 7:19 PM
To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Resolved artifacts for a test application. Built and tested. There is a duplicate source release however, I believe that this is trivial and can be dealt with in a readme or not at all (it is a default artifact from the maven release plugin).
+1 (binding)
On Jan 16, 2020 10:50 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
I looked back over the release docs, and the link I was supposed to send out out was this: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/<https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2F&v=3>
I was able to successfully resolve all artifacts with this link in a spark application.
please use this URL for to test the staged artifacts.
Thank you,
--andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 5:01 PM
To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Apologies, I'd not closed the staging repository, and sent out the wrong link In the initial email. the correct staging link is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/<https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3>
--andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 4:18 PM
To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release candidate; the more eyes the better.
Changed subject Line.
--Andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can test tomorrow.
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already have
> > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available in
> > staging:
> >
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> >
> > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> have
> > not tested /bin/mahout.
> >
> > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> >
> > For testing, lease do the following:
> > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> >
> > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> >
> > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
Resolved artifacts for a test application. Built and tested. There is a duplicate source release however, I believe that this is trivial and can be dealt with in a readme or not at all (it is a default artifact from the maven release plugin).
+1 (binding)
On Jan 16, 2020 10:50 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
I looked back over the release docs, and the link I was supposed to send out out was this: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/<https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2F&v=3>
I was able to successfully resolve all artifacts with this link in a spark application.
please use this URL for to test the staged artifacts.
Thank you,
--andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 5:01 PM
To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Apologies, I'd not closed the staging repository, and sent out the wrong link In the initial email. the correct staging link is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/<https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3>
--andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 4:18 PM
To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release candidate; the more eyes the better.
Changed subject Line.
--Andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can test tomorrow.
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already have
> > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available in
> > staging:
> >
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> >
> > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> have
> > not tested /bin/mahout.
> >
> > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> >
> > For testing, lease do the following:
> > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> >
> > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> >
> > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
I looked back over the release docs, and the link I was supposed to send out out was this: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/<https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2F&v=3>
I was able to successfully resolve all artifacts with this link in a spark application.
please use this URL for to test the staged artifacts.
Thank you,
--andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2020 5:01 PM
To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Apologies, I'd not closed the staging repository, and sent out the wrong link In the initial email. the correct staging link is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/<https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3>
--andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 4:18 PM
To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release candidate; the more eyes the better.
Changed subject Line.
--Andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can test tomorrow.
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already have
> > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available in
> > staging:
> >
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> >
> > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> have
> > not tested /bin/mahout.
> >
> > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> >
> > For testing, lease do the following:
> > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> >
> > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> >
> > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
Apologies, I'd not closed the staging repository, and sent out the wrong link In the initial email. the correct staging link is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/<https://slack-redir.net/link?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepository.apache.org%2Fcontent%2Frepositories%2Forgapachemahout-1060%2Forg%2Fapache%2Fmahout%2F&v=3>
--andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 4:18 PM
To: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>; dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release candidate; the more eyes the better.
Changed subject Line.
--Andy
________________________________
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I can test tomorrow.
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already have
> > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available in
> > staging:
> >
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> >
> > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> have
> > not tested /bin/mahout.
> >
> > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> >
> > For testing, lease do the following:
> > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> >
> > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> >
> > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
Thanks Trevor- I see. Looks like the backup poms are included also from during the release. that is odd. I will also try to fix the default distribution bug that i noticed. since Its the middle of the week.
OK dropping RC new one to come soon.
-andy
________________________________
From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 5:24 PM
To: Mahout Dev List <de...@mahout.apache.org>
Cc: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Hey,
I _think_ I'm -1
I went to build src (mvn clean install) on the 2.12 src and got an error:
```
[ERROR] Child module
/home/rawkintrevo/mahout-rc-test/engine/spark/pom.xml of
/home/rawkintrevo/mahout-rc-test/pom.xml does not exist
[ERROR] Child module
/home/rawkintrevo/mahout-rc-test/engine/hdfs/pom.xml of
/home/rawkintrevo/mahout-rc-test/pom.xml does not exist
```
I checked, and sure enough `engine/spark` and `engine/hdfs` are empty. Same
is true in 2.11 distribution.
Also- this is a very very confusing build.
The two source tarballs I was testing were:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/distribution_2.11/14.1/distribution_2.11-14.1-src.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/distribution_2.12/14.1/distribution_2.12-14.1-src.tar.gz
If these are the wrong ones, I'll rescind my -1
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 3:19 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release
> candidate; the more eyes the better.
>
> Changed subject Line.
>
> --Andy
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
>
> I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I can test tomorrow.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already
> have
> > > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available
> in
> > > staging:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> > >
> > > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> > have
> > > not tested /bin/mahout.
> > >
> > > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> > >
> > > For testing, lease do the following:
> > > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> > >
> > > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> > >
> > > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for [Volunteers] and vote
Posted by Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>.
Hey,
I _think_ I'm -1
I went to build src (mvn clean install) on the 2.12 src and got an error:
```
[ERROR] Child module
/home/rawkintrevo/mahout-rc-test/engine/spark/pom.xml of
/home/rawkintrevo/mahout-rc-test/pom.xml does not exist
[ERROR] Child module
/home/rawkintrevo/mahout-rc-test/engine/hdfs/pom.xml of
/home/rawkintrevo/mahout-rc-test/pom.xml does not exist
```
I checked, and sure enough `engine/spark` and `engine/hdfs` are empty. Same
is true in 2.11 distribution.
Also- this is a very very confusing build.
The two source tarballs I was testing were:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/distribution_2.11/14.1/distribution_2.11-14.1-src.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/org/apache/mahout/distribution_2.12/14.1/distribution_2.12-14.1-src.tar.gz
If these are the wrong ones, I'll rescind my -1
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 3:19 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
> This is a call for volunteers as well. Anyone may test the Release
> candidate; the more eyes the better.
>
> Changed subject Line.
>
> --Andy
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 1:43 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org <de...@mahout.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] MAHOUT-14.1 RC3 - call for testing and vote
>
> I will have time Thursday afternoon; thanks Andy
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 05:52 Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I can test tomorrow.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 1:41 AM Andrew Palumbo <an...@msn.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > > I've uploaded RC3 to nexus for scala 2.11 and scala 2.12. I already
> have
> > > seen a small issue while building the RC. All artifacts are available
> in
> > > staging:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/orgapachemahout-1060/content/org/apache/mahout/
> > >
> > > We should test this release well, as it is a heavy refactor, We still
> > have
> > > not tested /bin/mahout.
> > >
> > > So we need three binding +1s for this release.
> > >
> > > For testing, lease do the following:
> > > 1. Download build and test the src archive.
> > > 2. Run a job CCO e.g which uses the CLI.
> > > 3. run on a cluster/pseudo or otherwise.
> > > 4. Verify Sigs and hashes.
> > >
> > > I noticed that many people are busy this week. I am wondering if we
> > > can/should leave the Vote open longer than 72hrs.
> > >
> > > Or if we can work out all trivial issues, like naming and this extra
> > > source distribution, and I'll build RC4.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> >
>