You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@creadur.apache.org by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> on 2013/08/18 22:11:43 UTC
Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Rat
0.10]
On 08/17/13 21:09, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> Thanks for everyone who reviewed and voted. If anyone can spot any
> mistakes, please jump in before Noon tomorrow, Sunday August 18[1].
No one has spotted a mistake with the count, so I've committed the
compressed archives into https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/
Tomorrow (after giving the mirrors a chance to sync), the next step for
me will be to update the download page and archive Apache Rat 0.9 (from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/).
Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 09/03/13 22:44, sebb wrote:
> On 3 September 2013 20:24, Robert Burrell Donkin
<snip>
>> I'd like to give the production website a chance to sync before trying again
>> :-/
>>
>
> Looks like the EU mirror is stale.
>
> compare:
>
> http://creadur.eu.apache.org/rat/
> with
> http://creadur.us.apache.org/rat/
>
> I think we should delay the announcement until the EU mirror has caught up.
+1
Today, both look okay to me. (If anyone has a few spare cycles, please
take a look and jump if you spot any potential problems...)
I'll post the announcements tomorrow (Thursday) unless anyone else spots
any issues...
Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 3 September 2013 20:24, Robert Burrell Donkin
<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 09/03/13 19:47, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 3 September 2013 19:34, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/20/13 22:33, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
>>>> website from the 0.10 tag.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hopefully this should be done now
>>>
>>> If anyone has a few cycles, please give it a check...
>>
>>
>> The website header says "Version: 0.11-SNAPSHOT"
>> I don't understand that if it was created from the 0.10 branch.
>> I've just checked and the pom version is 0.10 as expected.
>
>
> The commit messages into staging have 0.10
>
> There's a commit message from staging into production
>
> When I refresh, sometimes the production site says 0.10 and sometimes
> 0.11-SNAPSHOT, so perhaps the production site hasn't completely synchronized
> yet...
>
>
>>> Is there anything else that needs doing before issuing the
>>> announcement...?
>>
>>
>> Regenerate the website so it agrees with the release?
>
>
> I'd like to give the production website a chance to sync before trying again
> :-/
>
Looks like the EU mirror is stale.
compare:
http://creadur.eu.apache.org/rat/
with
http://creadur.us.apache.org/rat/
I think we should delay the announcement until the EU mirror has caught up.
>
>> I checked a mirror and it had the files.
>>
>> However the "Browse download area" is pointing to the old area.
>
>
> The 0.10 should have this fixed
>
>
>> Also the jars don't seem to be present on Maven Central - did you
>> publish the Nexus staging area?
>
>
> IIRC, yes
>
> I've checked in staging, and the rat release is no longer there
>
> The release seems to be available from Apache
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.10/
>
> and is listed by
>
> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.rat/apache-rat-core/0.10
>
> Any particular jars that seem to be missing...?
Sorry, my bad.
0.10 sorts at the start and I expected to find it after 0.9 ...
> Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 09/03/13 19:47, sebb wrote:
> On 3 September 2013 19:34, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 08/20/13 22:33, sebb wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
>>> website from the 0.10 tag.
>>
>>
>> Hopefully this should be done now
>>
>> If anyone has a few cycles, please give it a check...
>
> The website header says "Version: 0.11-SNAPSHOT"
> I don't understand that if it was created from the 0.10 branch.
> I've just checked and the pom version is 0.10 as expected.
The commit messages into staging have 0.10
There's a commit message from staging into production
When I refresh, sometimes the production site says 0.10 and sometimes
0.11-SNAPSHOT, so perhaps the production site hasn't completely
synchronized yet...
>> Is there anything else that needs doing before issuing the announcement...?
>
> Regenerate the website so it agrees with the release?
I'd like to give the production website a chance to sync before trying
again :-/
> I checked a mirror and it had the files.
>
> However the "Browse download area" is pointing to the old area.
The 0.10 should have this fixed
> Also the jars don't seem to be present on Maven Central - did you
> publish the Nexus staging area?
IIRC, yes
I've checked in staging, and the rat release is no longer there
The release seems to be available from Apache
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/rat/apache-rat/0.10/
and is listed by
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.rat/apache-rat-core/0.10
Any particular jars that seem to be missing...?
Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 3 September 2013 19:34, Robert Burrell Donkin
<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 08/20/13 22:33, sebb wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
>> website from the 0.10 tag.
>
>
> Hopefully this should be done now
>
> If anyone has a few cycles, please give it a check...
The website header says "Version: 0.11-SNAPSHOT"
I don't understand that if it was created from the 0.10 branch.
I've just checked and the pom version is 0.10 as expected.
> Is there anything else that needs doing before issuing the announcement...?
Regenerate the website so it agrees with the release?
I checked a mirror and it had the files.
However the "Browse download area" is pointing to the old area.
Also the jars don't seem to be present on Maven Central - did you
publish the Nexus staging area?
> Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 08/20/13 22:33, sebb wrote:
<snip>
> I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
> website from the 0.10 tag.
Hopefully this should be done now
If anyone has a few cycles, please give it a check...
Is there anything else that needs doing before issuing the announcement...?
Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 09/01/13 21:00, sebb wrote:
> On 1 September 2013 20:53, Robert Burrell Donkin
> <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>> On 09/01/13 19:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/20/13 22:33, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
>>>> website from the 0.10 tag.
>>>>
>>>> The website should reflect the current GA release, not trunk, which
>>>> does not correspond with a release.
>>>>
>>>> The Maven guys complained about this, and on this point I agree with
>>>> them.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sounds like a good plan.
>>
>>
>> The 0.10 tag misses the updated download page,
>
> We should try and remember to fix that for the next release ...
How about using a parameter to substitute the current version during the
build...?
Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 1 September 2013 20:53, Robert Burrell Donkin
<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 09/01/13 19:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>> On 08/20/13 22:33, sebb wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
>>> website from the 0.10 tag.
>>>
>>> The website should reflect the current GA release, not trunk, which
>>> does not correspond with a release.
>>>
>>> The Maven guys complained about this, and on this point I agree with
>>> them.
>>
>>
>> Sounds like a good plan.
>
>
> The 0.10 tag misses the updated download page,
We should try and remember to fix that for the next release ...
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 09/01/13 20:55, P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 01.09.2013 21:53, schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/branches/apache-rat-project-0.10-website/
>> (unless anyone jumps in with a better name)
>
> I'd propose 0.10-cms to make it clearer that it's just a cms-thing but
> not a 'general' webpage?
Yes
Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@aiki-it.de>.
Hi,
Am 01.09.2013 21:53, schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/branches/apache-rat-project-0.10-website/
> (unless anyone jumps in with a better name)
I'd propose 0.10-cms to make it clearer that it's just a cms-thing but
not a 'general' webpage?
But I'm fine with website as well.
Cheers,
Phil
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 09/01/13 19:42, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 08/20/13 22:33, sebb wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>> I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
>> website from the 0.10 tag.
>>
>> The website should reflect the current GA release, not trunk, which
>> does not correspond with a release.
>>
>> The Maven guys complained about this, and on this point I agree with
>> them.
>
> Sounds like a good plan.
The 0.10 tag misses the updated download page, so we'll probably need to
take a small branch from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/tags/apache-rat-project-0.10/
perhaps something like
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/branches/apache-rat-project-0.10-website/
(unless anyone jumps in with a better name)
Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 08/20/13 22:33, sebb wrote:
<snip>
> I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
> website from the 0.10 tag.
>
> The website should reflect the current GA release, not trunk, which
> does not correspond with a release.
>
> The Maven guys complained about this, and on this point I agree with them.
Sounds like a good plan.
Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 20 August 2013 21:32, Robert Burrell Donkin
<ro...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 08/18/13 21:11, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>
>> On 08/17/13 21:09, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for everyone who reviewed and voted. If anyone can spot any
>>> mistakes, please jump in before Noon tomorrow, Sunday August 18[1].
>>
>>
>> No one has spotted a mistake with the count, so I've committed the
>> compressed archives into https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/
>>
>> Tomorrow (after giving the mirrors a chance to sync), the next step for
>> me will be to update the download page and archive Apache Rat 0.9 (from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/).
>
>
> The download page http://creadur.apache.org/rat/download_rat.cgi should now
> be pointed at Apache Rat 0.10 and Apache Rat 0.9 should now be archived. (If
> anyone has a few spare cycles, please take a quick look)
>
> Unless I've forgotten anything else, I think we're just about ready for the
> announcements.
I think the only thing that could be improved is to generate the
website from the 0.10 tag.
The website should reflect the current GA release, not trunk, which
does not correspond with a release.
The Maven guys complained about this, and on this point I agree with them.
> Robert
>
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 08/20/13 21:40, P. Ottlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 20.08.2013 22:32, schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
>> The download page http://creadur.apache.org/rat/download_rat.cgi should
>> now be pointed at Apache Rat 0.10 and Apache Rat 0.9 should now be
>> archived. (If anyone has a few spare cycles, please take a quick look)
>>
>> Unless I've forgotten anything else, I think we're just about ready for
>> the announcements.
>
> I just checked the tar.gz and verified its MD5sum once again.
>
> Seems ready for announcement to me -
> thanks for all your efforts!
Thanks for taking a look :-)
Robert
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@aiki-it.de>.
Hi,
Am 20.08.2013 22:32, schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
> The download page http://creadur.apache.org/rat/download_rat.cgi should
> now be pointed at Apache Rat 0.10 and Apache Rat 0.9 should now be
> archived. (If anyone has a few spare cycles, please take a quick look)
>
> Unless I've forgotten anything else, I think we're just about ready for
> the announcements.
I just checked the tar.gz and verified its MD5sum once again.
Seems ready for announcement to me -
thanks for all your efforts!
Phil
Re: Apache Rat 0.10 Promoted [WAS Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache
Rat 0.10]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 08/18/13 21:11, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 08/17/13 21:09, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>> Thanks for everyone who reviewed and voted. If anyone can spot any
>> mistakes, please jump in before Noon tomorrow, Sunday August 18[1].
>
> No one has spotted a mistake with the count, so I've committed the
> compressed archives into https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/
>
> Tomorrow (after giving the mirrors a chance to sync), the next step for
> me will be to update the download page and archive Apache Rat 0.9 (from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/).
The download page http://creadur.apache.org/rat/download_rat.cgi should
now be pointed at Apache Rat 0.10 and Apache Rat 0.9 should now be
archived. (If anyone has a few spare cycles, please take a quick look)
Unless I've forgotten anything else, I think we're just about ready for
the announcements.
Robert