You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Killhoven <Ki...@gmail.com> on 2013/05/02 14:18:53 UTC
AMQ failover using different PCs?
Hi!
Is it possible to set up AMQ failover master-slave solution so, that master
is in one PC and slave is on other PC? So if something happens with the PC
where master is running, secondary is not affected and can take over.
If yes, how should I configure?
Thanks in advance.
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: AMQ failover using different PCs?
Posted by Christian Posta <ch...@gmail.com>.
Not sure why shared file system would be "unreliable" in your case. We have
hundreds of clients with very stringent reliability and availability
requirements that use it.
If you don't want them to share a store, your best bet is to achieve what
you're looking for is to check out replicated leveldb:
http://activemq.apache.org/replicated-leveldb-store.html
It's not available until 5.9, but you can check out a nightly snappy here:
http://repository.apache.org/service/local/artifact/maven/redirect?r=snapshots&g=org.apache.activemq&a=apache-activemq&v=5.9-SNAPSHOT&e=tar.gz&c=bin
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Killhoven <Ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am literally interested in a reliable system: two separate stand-alone
> PC-s
> (they can be in the same LAN if needed), all traffic goes trough both (they
> do not share any resource like database, file system). In a moment master
> fails, slave takes over. When Master comes up, it will resync and take
> over.
>
> Options like Multicast, JDBC, shared file system etc are not reliable..
>
> If I configure the networkConnectors and transportConnectors to use IP
> addresses instead of the term localhost, It could work?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568p4667078.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta
Re: AMQ failover using different PCs?
Posted by Killhoven <Ki...@gmail.com>.
I am literally interested in a reliable system: two separate stand-alone PC-s
(they can be in the same LAN if needed), all traffic goes trough both (they
do not share any resource like database, file system). In a moment master
fails, slave takes over. When Master comes up, it will resync and take over.
Options like Multicast, JDBC, shared file system etc are not reliable..
If I configure the networkConnectors and transportConnectors to use IP
addresses instead of the term localhost, It could work?
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568p4667078.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: AMQ failover using different PCs?
Posted by Chris Lim <ch...@gmail.com>.
You may also explore JDBC Master-Slave -
http://activemq.apache.org/jdbc-master-slave.html
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Killhoven <Ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also found out Multicasting could be an option (it is ok if all broker
> machines and clients are in the same LAN), but it is not reliable.
>
> Any other options? How do you implement failover solution in a way that if
> something happens with the master machine, system can go on ?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568p4666648.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: AMQ failover using different PCs?
Posted by Killhoven <Ki...@gmail.com>.
I also found out Multicasting could be an option (it is ok if all broker
machines and clients are in the same LAN), but it is not reliable.
Any other options? How do you implement failover solution in a way that if
something happens with the master machine, system can go on ?
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568p4666648.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: AMQ failover using different PCs?
Posted by Johan Edstrom <se...@gmail.com>.
It is one of the better options, otherwise you are stuck with an RDMBS
or a clustering filesystem.
LevelDB in very new development offer some new cool stuff.
On May 2, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Killhoven <Ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> This option is definitely doable, but not the best solution. Is there any
> other way to set up two stand-alone PC-s with AMQ, a master and slave ?
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568p4666591.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: AMQ failover using different PCs?
Posted by Killhoven <Ki...@gmail.com>.
Thanks!
This option is definitely doable, but not the best solution. Is there any
other way to set up two stand-alone PC-s with AMQ, a master and slave ?
--
View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568p4666591.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: AMQ failover using different PCs?
Posted by Christian Posta <ch...@gmail.com>.
Yep, you can do so with a shared disk so that master and slave look at the
same persistent store. When master goes down, slave can take over right
where master left off.
Take a look here for details:
http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 5:18 AM, Killhoven <Ki...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is it possible to set up AMQ failover master-slave solution so, that master
> is in one PC and slave is on other PC? So if something happens with the PC
> where master is running, secondary is not affected and can take over.
>
> If yes, how should I configure?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/AMQ-failover-using-different-PCs-tp4666568.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta