You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com> on 2003/06/05 18:57:13 UTC
[VOTE] New Committer, Mr. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Moving ahead to the one-step process version ... :-) So far we have:
Harmeet Bedi: +1
Danny Angus: +1
Noel J. Bergman: +1
I expect Serge will post an official +1, too. I can't speak for Darrell,
Charles, Peter, et al, who haven't been around too much lately, but the
measure will carry unless someone vetoes, which I don't expect.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] New Committer, Mr. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Posted by Danny Angus <da...@apache.org>.
I think the only problem was that harmeet & I jumped the gun and expressed our opinion with +1's
d.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:sergek@lokitech.com]
> Sent: 05 June 2003 19:03
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] New Committer, Mr. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
>
>
> Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > I did propose him. Harmeet and Danny both wanted to vote.
> You commented
> > that I was being too nice by proposing first, so I posted it
> as a vote as
> > you appeared to have requested.
>
> Noel,
>
> I'm sorry. I must not be sleeping or something. Here's what I think
> happened:
>
> You did (effectively) propose Vincenzo, but I was looking for:
> a) calling it a nomination.
> b) a call for a vote.
>
> So your email didn't set a flag off in me, and I didn't realize this
> from yesterday as the source of the confusion until just now.
>
> In light of the confusion, let's start counting 48 hours as of your
> message today at 12:57:13 -0400 that mentions a call to vote. With my
> +1, you've got 4 +1 and a passing nomination assuming nobody vetoes in
> the next 46 hours.
>
> --
> Serge Knystautas
> President
> Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
> p. 301.656.5501
> e. sergek@lokitech.com
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
Re: [VOTE] New Committer, Mr. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Posted by Serge Knystautas <se...@lokitech.com>.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> I did propose him. Harmeet and Danny both wanted to vote. You commented
> that I was being too nice by proposing first, so I posted it as a vote as
> you appeared to have requested.
Noel,
I'm sorry. I must not be sleeping or something. Here's what I think
happened:
You did (effectively) propose Vincenzo, but I was looking for:
a) calling it a nomination.
b) a call for a vote.
So your email didn't set a flag off in me, and I didn't realize this
from yesterday as the source of the confusion until just now.
In light of the confusion, let's start counting 48 hours as of your
message today at 12:57:13 -0400 that mentions a call to vote. With my
+1, you've got 4 +1 and a passing nomination assuming nobody vetoes in
the next 46 hours.
--
Serge Knystautas
President
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. sergek@lokitech.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] New Committer, Mr. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
> I must reset your expectations on this. The procedure is this:
> 1. An existing committer nominates a contributor, or the contributor can
> ask for it themselves.
I did propose him. Harmeet and Danny both wanted to vote. You commented
that I was being too nice by proposing first, so I posted it as a vote as
you appeared to have requested.
> 2. Once nominated, all committers on the subproject will vote. You need
> at least 3 positive votes and no negative votes. Typically we give
> 48-72 for everyone to vote if they're going to.
Right ... I didn't understand it any other way. I simply indicated that I
expected the vote to carry.
> 3. If approved, we get them an account (if not already) and otherwise
> set them up as a committer.
As you said, first we vote.
> If you want to nominate Vincenzo, then great, we can have can start this
> process and take a vote.
I had done so. At least I understood myself to have done so.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] New Committer, Mr. Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Posted by Serge Knystautas <se...@lokitech.com>.
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> Moving ahead to the one-step process version ... :-) So far we have:
>
> Harmeet Bedi: +1
> Danny Angus: +1
> Noel J. Bergman: +1
>
> I expect Serge will post an official +1, too. I can't speak for Darrell,
> Charles, Peter, et al, who haven't been around too much lately, but the
> measure will carry unless someone vetoes, which I don't expect.
Noel,
I must reset your expectations on this. The procedure is this:
1. An existing committer nominates a contributor, or the contributor can
ask for it themselves.
2. Once nominated, all committers on the subproject will vote. You need
at least 3 positive votes and no negative votes. Typically we give
48-72 for everyone to vote if they're going to.
3. If approved, we get them an account (if not already) and otherwise
set them up as a committer.
Right now we're at step 0, or rather, on some unofficial path that
should be stopped in the interest of avoiding confusion.
If you want to nominate Vincenzo, then great, we can have can start this
process and take a vote.
--
Serge Knystautas
President
Lokitech >> software . strategy . design >> http://www.lokitech.com
p. 301.656.5501
e. sergek@lokitech.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: james-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: james-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org