You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@geode.apache.org by "Bill Burcham (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/02/20 21:51:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (GEODE-6410) review use of putIfAbsent

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Bill Burcham reassigned GEODE-6410:
-----------------------------------

    Assignee: Bill Burcham

> review use of putIfAbsent
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: GEODE-6410
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-6410
>             Project: Geode
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: general
>            Reporter: Jason Huynh
>            Assignee: Bill Burcham
>            Priority: Major
>
> Usages of putIfAbsent in Geode on ConcurrentHashMap may not have realized the actual synchronized/atomic nature of the putIfAbsent.  See [https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6737839]
> This ticket is for someone to review or possibly change the putIfAbsent usages to be more performant. 
> Not sure if putIfAbsent is called enough and under contention enough for this to matter...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)