[jira] [Commented] (TOMEE-2024) Misleading log entries

["Gurkan Erdogdu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2024?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16522215#comment-16522215 ] 

Gurkan Erdogdu commented on TOMEE-2024:
---------------------------------------

[~romain.manni-bucau] I think this will be closed as Not Fixed, right?

> Misleading log entries
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: TOMEE-2024
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2024
>             Project: TomEE
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 7.0.3, 7.0.4
>            Reporter: Svetlin Zarev
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Assembler:1420-1454:
> {code}
>             final String jtaWithJavaAndSlash = replaceJavaAndSlash(unit.getJtaDataSource());
>             for (final String potentialName : asList(prefix + jtaWithJavaAndSlash, originalJtaDataSource, jtaWithJavaAndSlash)) {
>                 if(potentialName == null) {
>                     // If unit.getJtaDataSource() is null, one of the potentialName is also null.
>                     continue;
>                 }
>                 final ResourceInfo jtaInfo = configFactory.getResourceInfo(potentialName);
>                 if (jtaInfo != null) {
>                     if (!"false".equalsIgnoreCase(jtaInfo.properties.getProperty("JtaManaged")) // don't test true since it can be missing
>                             && (jtaInfo.types.contains("DataSource") || jtaInfo.types.contains(DataSource.class.getName()))) {
>                         jtaDataSourceId = jtaInfo.id;
>                         break;
>                     } else {
> ----->                        logger.warning("Found matching datasource: " + jtaInfo.id + " but this one is not a JTA datasource");
>                     }
>                 }
>             }
>             final String nonJtaWithJavaAndSlash = replaceJavaAndSlash(unit.getNonJtaDataSource());
>             for (final String potentialName : asList(prefix + nonJtaWithJavaAndSlash, originalNonJtaDataSource, nonJtaWithJavaAndSlash)) {
>                 if(potentialName == null) {
>                     // If unit.getNonJtaDataSource() is null, one of the potentialName is also null.
>                     continue;
>                 }
>                 final ResourceInfo info = configFactory.getResourceInfo(potentialName);
>                 if (info != null) {
>                     if (!"true".equalsIgnoreCase(info.properties.getProperty("JtaManaged"))
>                             && (info.types.contains("DataSource") || info.types.contains(DataSource.class.getName()))) {
>                         nonJtaDataSourceId = info.id;
>                         break;
>                     } else {
> ----->                        logger.warning("Found matching datasource: " + info.id + " but this one is a JTA datasource");
>                     }
>                 }
>             }
> {code}
> The two warnings are very misleading, because it prints that my JTA data-source is NON JTA one, and my non-jta is jta data-source when my service provider does not have  "javax.sql.DataSource" in the "types" property.
> Also IMO when I explicitly set the service provider it should not matter what "types" it has in the service-jar.xml.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)