You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@nifi.apache.org by Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com> on 2016/08/29 07:00:26 UTC
Request for enhancement
Hi Team,
I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can be
incorporated in the provenance graph.
Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we can
actually put in the component name along with processor type. That would
make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually intuitive.
just a suggestion, not mandatory.
Re: Request for enhancement
Posted by Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>.
Hi Joe, I dont seem to have access to nifi jira to create one. Can it be
given? Or if not, could someone help raising it.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016, 7:49 AM Joe Percivall <jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> - Moving users list to BCC
>
> Hello Gunjan,
>
> This seems like a good potential idea. The proper place to submit the
> suggestion is through the Apache NiFi Jira[1]. It can more easily be
> discussed and worked on there.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI
>
>
> Suggestions/ideas from users are always welcome!
>
> Joe
> - - - - - -
> Joseph Percivall
> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
> e: joepercivall@yahoo.com
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:06 PM, Gunjan Dave <
> gunjanpiyushdave@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Seems like below didnot get delivered.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Team,
> > I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> > be incorporated in the provenance graph.
> >
> > Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> > can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> > would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually
> intuitive.
> >
> > just a suggestion, not mandatory.
> >
>
Re: Request for enhancement
Posted by Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>.
Hi Joe, I dont seem to have access to nifi jira to create one. Can it be
given? Or if not, could someone help raising it.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016, 7:49 AM Joe Percivall <jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> - Moving users list to BCC
>
> Hello Gunjan,
>
> This seems like a good potential idea. The proper place to submit the
> suggestion is through the Apache NiFi Jira[1]. It can more easily be
> discussed and worked on there.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI
>
>
> Suggestions/ideas from users are always welcome!
>
> Joe
> - - - - - -
> Joseph Percivall
> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
> e: joepercivall@yahoo.com
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:06 PM, Gunjan Dave <
> gunjanpiyushdave@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Seems like below didnot get delivered.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Team,
> > I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> > be incorporated in the provenance graph.
> >
> > Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> > can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> > would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually
> intuitive.
> >
> > just a suggestion, not mandatory.
> >
>
Re: Request for enhancement
Posted by Joe Percivall <jo...@yahoo.com>.
- Moving users list to BCC
Hello Gunjan,
This seems like a good potential idea. The proper place to submit the suggestion is through the Apache NiFi Jira[1]. It can more easily be discussed and worked on there.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI
Suggestions/ideas from users are always welcome!
Joe
- - - - - -
Joseph Percivall
linkedin.com/in/Percivall
e: joepercivall@yahoo.com
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:06 PM, Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Seems like below didnot get delivered.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
> I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> be incorporated in the provenance graph.
>
> Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually intuitive.
>
> just a suggestion, not mandatory.
>
Re: Request for enhancement
Posted by Joe Percivall <jo...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
- Moving users list to BCC
Hello Gunjan,
This seems like a good potential idea. The proper place to submit the suggestion is through the Apache NiFi Jira[1]. It can more easily be discussed and worked on there.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI
Suggestions/ideas from users are always welcome!
Joe
- - - - - -
Joseph Percivall
linkedin.com/in/Percivall
e: joepercivall@yahoo.com
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 12:06 PM, Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Seems like below didnot get delivered.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
> I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> be incorporated in the provenance graph.
>
> Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually intuitive.
>
> just a suggestion, not mandatory.
>
Re: Request for enhancement
Posted by Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>.
Seems like below didnot get delivered.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
> I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> be incorporated in the provenance graph.
>
> Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually intuitive.
>
> just a suggestion, not mandatory.
>
Re: Request for enhancement
Posted by Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>.
Seems like below didnot get delivered.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 12:30 PM Gunjan Dave <gu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Team,
> I would like to propose if the following enhacement if seen feasible can
> be incorporated in the provenance graph.
>
> Current graph only shows the type, rather i would like to suggest if we
> can actually put in the component name along with processor type. That
> would make the graph more unique to each flow and more visually intuitive.
>
> just a suggestion, not mandatory.
>