You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "Kay Kay (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/02/11 23:46:28 UTC
[jira] Commented: (HBASE-2214) Do hbase-1966 -- setting size to
return in scan rather than count of rows -- properly
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12832716#action_12832716 ]
Kay Kay commented on HBASE-2214:
--------------------------------
Makes sense conceptually . Would be nice to have a final version of the patch logging the number of rows on the server side when scanning by size , so as to estimate the density / sparsity of the data across columns when we scan by size.
> Do hbase-1966 -- setting size to return in scan rather than count of rows -- properly
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-2214
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2214
> Project: Hadoop HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: stack
> Fix For: 0.21.0
>
>
> The notion that you set size rather than row count specifying how many rows a scanner should return in each cycle was raised over in hbase-1966. Its a good one making hbase "regular" though the data under it may vary. HBase-1966 was committed but the patch was constrained by the fact that it needed to not change RPC interface. This issue is about doing hbase-1966 for 0.21 in a clean, unconstrained way.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.