You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@annotator.apache.org by Randall Leeds <ra...@apache.org> on 2020/05/31 00:45:08 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)
Dear community,
I would like to propose we release Apache Annotator (incubating) 0.1.0.
This is the fourth release candidate. Careful readers will note that the
third release candidate was never voted upon. Gerben found an issue with
Node.js 14 before voting began. Changes since the second release candidate:
- Remove the fragment identifier package over issues arising from
ambiguities in the specification
- Remove references to the fragment identifier specification and parse
grammar from NOTICE and LICENSE files
- Fix missing license headers
- Small updates to the demonstration code
- Fix errors on Node.js 14
- Improve release procedure
We encourage everyone to help us verify that the release is proper and help
identify and fix any issues before the release is finalized.
The release artifacts are here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/annotator/source/0.1.0/rc.4
There you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums.
A KEYS file for checking the signature can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/annotator/KEYS
Please refer to the release testing procedures for instructions on testing
the release:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Testing-a-Source-Release
If the vote passes, these artifacts will be proposed to the Apache
Incubator for release as Apache Annotator (incubating) 0.1.0.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0
(-rc.4)
Posted by Nick Kew <ni...@apache.org>.
> On 31 May 2020, at 01:45, Randall Leeds <ra...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Dear community,
>
> I would like to propose we release Apache Annotator (incubating) 0.1.0.
+1 with reservations (things to consider before next-release):
> This is the fourth release candidate. Careful readers will note that the
> third release candidate was never voted upon. Gerben found an issue with
> Node.js 14 before voting began. Changes since the second release candidate:
Talking of Node.js, the README might say something about prerequisites.
yarnpkg.com might be a good site to reference?
> - Remove references to the fragment identifier specification and parse
> grammar from NOTICE and LICENSE files
Those are looking very minimalist now. I think that's fine.
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/annotator/source/0.1.0/rc.4
>
> There you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums.
The signature lacks signatures. I know that's not something you can
simply fix, but please bear it in mind!
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/wiki/Testing-a-Source-Release
I still need to read that, but I don't want to delay you any longer!
I see no showstoppers, and ran your checks OK (macos/homebrew).
--
Nick Kew
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)
Posted by TB Dinesh <di...@servelots.com>.
+1
:)
On Thu, 4 Jun, 2020, 18:53 Suzan Uskudarli, <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> All checks succeed:
>
> 1. gpg --verify apache-annotator-*.tar.gz.asc -- OK (good sigs from
> Randall Leeds)
> 2. sha256sum and sha512sum -- OK
> apache-annotator-0.1.0-rc.4-incubating.tar.gz: OK
> 3. git remote show origin -- OK
> 4. git describe -- OK (v0.1.0-rc.4)
> 5. git fetch --unshallow origin tag v0.1.0-rc.4 -- OK
> 6. git status --ignored -- OK (On branch v0.1.x, no changes added to
> commit )
> 7. make check: OK
> 8. License - OK
>
> I am attaching all the results in case it may be useful
>
> I don't know if I am eligible to vote, if I am +1
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 9:26 PM Benjamin Young <by...@bigbluehat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Just completed all the tests, and everything looks great!
>>
>> +1
>>
>> (sorry again for the delay!)
>> Benjamin
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> http://bigbluehat.com/
>>
>> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Benjamin Young <by...@bigbluehat.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 5:06 PM
>> To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org <
>> dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0
>> (-rc.4)
>>
>> Started work on this today, but my day got eaten. 😕 I'll try again
>> tomorrow...
>>
>> Apologies,
>> Benjamin
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> http://bigbluehat.com/
>>
>> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Gerben <ge...@treora.com.INVALID>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 7:49 AM
>> To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org <
>> dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0
>> (-rc.4)
>>
>> +1 indeed.
>>
>> I ran all checks except Rat.
>>
>> On 31/05/2020 02:52, Randall Leeds wrote:
>> > My test results:
>> >
>> > - Signature OK
>> > - Checksums OK
>> > - Local tag matches remote tag
>> > - Contents of the tarball are clean
>> > - Running "make check" passes (Node.js v10.19.0)
>> > - Apache Rat shows no files with license issues
>> >
>> > Vote: +1
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)
Posted by Suzan Uskudarli <su...@gmail.com>.
All checks succeed:
1. gpg --verify apache-annotator-*.tar.gz.asc -- OK (good sigs from
Randall Leeds)
2. sha256sum and sha512sum -- OK
apache-annotator-0.1.0-rc.4-incubating.tar.gz: OK
3. git remote show origin -- OK
4. git describe -- OK (v0.1.0-rc.4)
5. git fetch --unshallow origin tag v0.1.0-rc.4 -- OK
6. git status --ignored -- OK (On branch v0.1.x, no changes added to
commit )
7. make check: OK
8. License - OK
I am attaching all the results in case it may be useful
I don't know if I am eligible to vote, if I am +1
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 9:26 PM Benjamin Young <by...@bigbluehat.com> wrote:
> Just completed all the tests, and everything looks great!
>
> +1
>
> (sorry again for the delay!)
> Benjamin
>
>
> --
>
> http://bigbluehat.com/
>
> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
>
> ________________________________
> From: Benjamin Young <by...@bigbluehat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 5:06 PM
> To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org <dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org
> >
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0
> (-rc.4)
>
> Started work on this today, but my day got eaten. 😕 I'll try again
> tomorrow...
>
> Apologies,
> Benjamin
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://bigbluehat.com/
>
> http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
>
> ________________________________
> From: Gerben <ge...@treora.com.INVALID>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 7:49 AM
> To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org <dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org
> >
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0
> (-rc.4)
>
> +1 indeed.
>
> I ran all checks except Rat.
>
> On 31/05/2020 02:52, Randall Leeds wrote:
> > My test results:
> >
> > - Signature OK
> > - Checksums OK
> > - Local tag matches remote tag
> > - Contents of the tarball are clean
> > - Running "make check" passes (Node.js v10.19.0)
> > - Apache Rat shows no files with license issues
> >
> > Vote: +1
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0
(-rc.4)
Posted by Benjamin Young <by...@bigbluehat.com>.
Just completed all the tests, and everything looks great!
+1
(sorry again for the delay!)
Benjamin
--
http://bigbluehat.com/
http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
________________________________
From: Benjamin Young <by...@bigbluehat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 5:06 PM
To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org <de...@annotator.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)
Started work on this today, but my day got eaten. 😕 I'll try again tomorrow...
Apologies,
Benjamin
--
http://bigbluehat.com/
http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
________________________________
From: Gerben <ge...@treora.com.INVALID>
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 7:49 AM
To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org <de...@annotator.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)
+1 indeed.
I ran all checks except Rat.
On 31/05/2020 02:52, Randall Leeds wrote:
> My test results:
>
> - Signature OK
> - Checksums OK
> - Local tag matches remote tag
> - Contents of the tarball are clean
> - Running "make check" passes (Node.js v10.19.0)
> - Apache Rat shows no files with license issues
>
> Vote: +1
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0
(-rc.4)
Posted by Benjamin Young <by...@bigbluehat.com>.
Started work on this today, but my day got eaten. 😕 I'll try again tomorrow...
Apologies,
Benjamin
--
http://bigbluehat.com/
http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung
________________________________
From: Gerben <ge...@treora.com.INVALID>
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 7:49 AM
To: dev@annotator.incubator.apache.org <de...@annotator.incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)
+1 indeed.
I ran all checks except Rat.
On 31/05/2020 02:52, Randall Leeds wrote:
> My test results:
>
> - Signature OK
> - Checksums OK
> - Local tag matches remote tag
> - Contents of the tarball are clean
> - Running "make check" passes (Node.js v10.19.0)
> - Apache Rat shows no files with license issues
>
> Vote: +1
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0
(-rc.4)
Posted by Gerben <ge...@treora.com.INVALID>.
+1 indeed.
I ran all checks except Rat.
On 31/05/2020 02:52, Randall Leeds wrote:
> My test results:
>
> - Signature OK
> - Checksums OK
> - Local tag matches remote tag
> - Contents of the tarball are clean
> - Running "make check" passes (Node.js v10.19.0)
> - Apache Rat shows no files with license issues
>
> Vote: +1
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Annotator (incubating) version 0.1.0 (-rc.4)
Posted by Randall Leeds <ra...@apache.org>.
My test results:
- Signature OK
- Checksums OK
- Local tag matches remote tag
- Contents of the tarball are clean
- Running "make check" passes (Node.js v10.19.0)
- Apache Rat shows no files with license issues
Vote: +1