You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to scm-dev@maven.apache.org by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> on 2008/08/25 10:29:33 UTC
Why using flattened structure [was Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Scm 1.1 (take 3)]
I change the subject because I don't see any link with the vote on the
scm release.
And why you don't want to use this structure ?.
--
Olivier
2008/8/25 ChrisGWarp <Ch...@aami.com.au>:
>
>
>
> Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>> Try :
>> svn co
>> http://svn.warpspeed.com.au/test-repos/FireDragon/branches/olamy-test/
>> FireDragon-olamy-test && cd FireDragon-olamy-test && mvn
>> release:prepare release:perform -B
>>
>> I have build two releases with success here :
>> http://svn.warpspeed.com.au/test-repos/FireDragon/tags/
>>
>
> You have the results that I would expect from the normal nested maven
> approach.
>
> However, it totally ignores my situation, namely the flattened structure,
> which is what I need to have working.
>
> -Chris
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Maven-Scm-1.1-%28take-3%29-tp19123852p19139773.html
> Sent from the Maven - SCM mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Re: AW: Why using flattened structure [was Re: [VOTE] Release Maven
Scm 1.1 (take 3)]
Posted by ChrisGWarp <Ch...@aami.com.au>.
struberg wrote:
>
>> And why you don't want to use this structure ?.
>
> I guess the main argument is that eclipse cannot nest projects, so there's
> no way to edit your parent pom (+ parent site, etc) with eclipse (instead
> you have to vi + svn commit on the command line).
>
> BUT: My gut feeling tells me that this is no maven-scm problem but a
> problem within the maven-release-plugin. Can anyone shed a light on this?
>
> So I agree with Chris that we should address this issue, but also with
> Olivier that this should not hinder us from releasing maven-scm.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
Yes it is an eclipse related issue.
Yes this is occuring during a release:prepare, however, surely it must be
the SCM that is doing the commit? It is just being called internally by the
release plugin. Hence, an SCM issue.
-Chris
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Why-using-flattened-structure--was-Re%3A--VOTE--Release-Maven-Scm-1.1-%28take-3%29--tp19139828p19158235.html
Sent from the Maven - SCM mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
AW: Why using flattened structure [was Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Scm 1.1 (take 3)]
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
> And why you don't want to use this structure ?.
I guess the main argument is that eclipse cannot nest projects, so there's no way to edit your parent pom (+ parent site, etc) with eclipse (instead you have to vi + svn commit on the command line).
BUT: My gut feeling tells me that this is no maven-scm problem but a problem within the maven-release-plugin. Can anyone shed a light on this?
So I agree with Chris that we should address this issue, but also with Olivier that this should not hinder us from releasing maven-scm.
LieGrue,
strub
--- Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> schrieb am Mo, 25.8.2008:
> Von: Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>
> Betreff: Why using flattened structure [was Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Scm 1.1 (take 3)]
> An: scm-dev@maven.apache.org
> Datum: Montag, 25. August 2008, 10:29
> I change the subject because I don't see any link with
> the vote on the
> scm release.
>
> And why you don't want to use this structure ?.
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> 2008/8/25 ChrisGWarp <Ch...@aami.com.au>:
> >
> >
> >
> > Olivier Lamy wrote:
> >>
> >> Try :
> >> svn co
> >>
> http://svn.warpspeed.com.au/test-repos/FireDragon/branches/olamy-test/
> >> FireDragon-olamy-test && cd
> FireDragon-olamy-test && mvn
> >> release:prepare release:perform -B
> >>
> >> I have build two releases with success here :
> >>
> http://svn.warpspeed.com.au/test-repos/FireDragon/tags/
> >>
> >
> > You have the results that I would expect from the
> normal nested maven
> > approach.
> >
> > However, it totally ignores my situation, namely the
> flattened structure,
> > which is what I need to have working.
> >
> > -Chris
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-Maven-Scm-1.1-%28take-3%29-tp19123852p19139773.html
> > Sent from the Maven - SCM mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> >
> >
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
http://mail.yahoo.com