You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2010/10/12 10:46:48 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0-beta
what happened to this vote ?
-Matthias
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 07/22/2010 04:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Michael Freedman
>> <mi...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On 7/20/2010 2:09 PM, Michael Freedman wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge
>>>> 2.0.0-beta.
>>>> This is the beta version of the JSR 329 RI: Portlet 2.0 Bridge for
>>>> JavaServer Faces 1.2. It corresponds to that JSRs Public Review draft
>>>> which
>>>> is currently posted and underway.
>>>>
>>>> The signed bridge artifacts pass what exists of the 329 TCK (i.e. all
>>>> its
>>>> tests) and I have verified that the examples run. It can be inspected
>>>> at
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge/2.0.0-beta/
>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>> [ ] +0
>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>>> and why..............
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Mike-
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0-beta
Posted by Martin Marinschek <mm...@apache.org>.
Hi Mike,
you should send out the result vote roughly 72hrs after the vote has
started. When you do the release based on the vote - is your timing
thingy ;)
best regards,
Martin
On 10/12/10, Michael Freedman <mi...@oracle.com> wrote:
> Actually, I had deferred sending the results message pending us
> actually doing/pushing the release which I thought was imminent. Alas I
> am still awaiting getting some free time from the developer tasked to do
> this but that slot never seems to open up -- so its now 2+ months since
> this was done and still it hasn't been published. If you would prefer I
> am happy to send a message concerning the vote result -- but I still
> don't have a time estimate for when the release/push will actually
> happen. Let me know whether I should wait until the push is ready to go
> or I should just send this message to get it off the stack.
> -Mike-
>
> On 10/12/2010 9:23 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>> Mike Freedman sent out the announcement. It looks like I forgot the
>> results email. Sorry Matthias.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Oct 12, 2010, at 2:47 AM, Matthias Wessendorf<ma...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> what happened to this vote ?
>>>
>>> -Matthias
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Scott O'Bryan<da...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On 07/22/2010 04:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Michael Freedman
>>>>> <mi...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/20/2010 2:09 PM, Michael Freedman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge
>>>>>>> 2.0.0-beta.
>>>>>>> This is the beta version of the JSR 329 RI: Portlet 2.0 Bridge for
>>>>>>> JavaServer Faces 1.2. It corresponds to that JSRs Public Review
>>>>>>> draft
>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>> is currently posted and underway.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The signed bridge artifacts pass what exists of the 329 TCK (i.e. all
>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>> tests) and I have verified that the examples run. It can be
>>>>>>> inspected
>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge/2.0.0-beta/
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>>>>>>> released,
>>>>>>> and why..............
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> -Mike-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0-beta
Posted by Michael Freedman <mi...@oracle.com>.
Actually, I had deferred sending the results message pending us
actually doing/pushing the release which I thought was imminent. Alas I
am still awaiting getting some free time from the developer tasked to do
this but that slot never seems to open up -- so its now 2+ months since
this was done and still it hasn't been published. If you would prefer I
am happy to send a message concerning the vote result -- but I still
don't have a time estimate for when the release/push will actually
happen. Let me know whether I should wait until the push is ready to go
or I should just send this message to get it off the stack.
-Mike-
On 10/12/2010 9:23 AM, Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> Mike Freedman sent out the announcement. It looks like I forgot the
> results email. Sorry Matthias.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 12, 2010, at 2:47 AM, Matthias Wessendorf<ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> what happened to this vote ?
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Scott O'Bryan<da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On 07/22/2010 04:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Michael Freedman
>>>> <mi...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/20/2010 2:09 PM, Michael Freedman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge
>>>>>> 2.0.0-beta.
>>>>>> This is the beta version of the JSR 329 RI: Portlet 2.0 Bridge for
>>>>>> JavaServer Faces 1.2. It corresponds to that JSRs Public Review draft
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> is currently posted and underway.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The signed bridge artifacts pass what exists of the 329 TCK (i.e. all
>>>>>> its
>>>>>> tests) and I have verified that the examples run. It can be inspected
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge/2.0.0-beta/
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>>>>> and why..............
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> -Mike-
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [VOTE] Release MyFaces Portlet Bridge 2.0.0-beta
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Mike Freedman sent out the announcement. It looks like I forgot the
results email. Sorry Matthias.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2010, at 2:47 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> what happened to this vote ?
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On 07/22/2010 04:41 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Michael Freedman
>>> <mi...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On 7/20/2010 2:09 PM, Michael Freedman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote on the proposed release of MyFaces Portlet Bridge
>>>>> 2.0.0-beta.
>>>>> This is the beta version of the JSR 329 RI: Portlet 2.0 Bridge for
>>>>> JavaServer Faces 1.2. It corresponds to that JSRs Public Review draft
>>>>> which
>>>>> is currently posted and underway.
>>>>>
>>>>> The signed bridge artifacts pass what exists of the 329 TCK (i.e. all
>>>>> its
>>>>> tests) and I have verified that the examples run. It can be inspected
>>>>> at
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~mfreedman/portlet-bridge/2.0.0-beta/
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>>>>> and why..............
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -Mike-
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf