You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2007/05/03 10:12:38 UTC
jpa changes might have broken stuff-- please report problems
I just committed a bunch of changes I've been working on for a
while. Its possible that some might affect other areas, in
particular GEROIMO-3134 which changes how our jndi references find
the configuration to search for the target gbean.
One good effect is that I think persistence units directly in wars
are now working properly.
If there are problems please speak up.
thanks
david jencks
Re: jpa changes might have broken stuff-- please report problems
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On May 3, 2007, at 10:13 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2007, at 1:12 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>> I just committed a bunch of changes I've been working on for a
>> while. Its possible that some might affect other areas, in
>> particular GEROIMO-3134 which changes how our jndi references find
>> the configuration to search for the target gbean.
>>
>> One good effect is that I think persistence units directly in wars
>> are now working properly.
>>
>> If there are problems please speak up.
>
> Seems client refs involving an abstract query no longer work.
Kevan noticed this and reopened GERONIMO-3134. I'm working on a fix
david jencks
>
> -David
>
Re: jpa changes might have broken stuff-- please report problems
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On May 3, 2007, at 1:12 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> I just committed a bunch of changes I've been working on for a
> while. Its possible that some might affect other areas, in
> particular GEROIMO-3134 which changes how our jndi references find
> the configuration to search for the target gbean.
>
> One good effect is that I think persistence units directly in wars
> are now working properly.
>
> If there are problems please speak up.
Seems client refs involving an abstract query no longer work.
-David