[jira] [Comment Edited] (HBASE-11610) Enhance remote meta updates

["Nicolas Liochon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11610?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14109229#comment-14109229 ] 

Nicolas Liochon edited comment on HBASE-11610 at 8/25/14 3:52 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

bq. threadLocal HTable ), it is ~5% slower
Ah, ok. It's a little bit strange actually. But not big enough to delay the patch.

bq. done with 10 HConnections
I see. Then let's keep it.

bq. will use the single pool managed by MultiHConnection
I haven't checked in the code, but it seems you're right.

bq. how about hbase.multihconnection.threads.max as the pool is part of MultiHconnection?
No strong opinion. As you like for me.

+1 for the patch, as the remaining is pure nit.





was (Author: nkeywal):
bq. threadLocal HTable ), it is ~5% slower
Ah, ok. It's a little bit strange actually. But not big enough to delay the patch.

bq. done with 10 HConnections
I see. Then let's keep it.

bq. will use the single pool managed by MultiHConnection
I haven't checked in the code, but it seems you're right.

bq. how about hbase.multihconnection.threads.max as the pool is part of MultiHconnection?
No strong opinion. As you like for me.

+1 for the patch, as the remaining it pure nit.




> Enhance remote meta updates
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-11610
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-11610
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Jimmy Xiang
>            Assignee: Virag Kothari
>         Attachments: HBASE-11610.patch, HBASE-11610_2.patch, HBASE-11610_v3.patch
>
>
> Currently, if the meta region is on a regionserver instead of the master, meta update is synchronized on one HTable instance. We should be able to do better.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)