You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/07/17 05:00:09 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35769] New: -
Wrong implementation of javax.naming.Context.composeName
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35769>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35769
Summary: Wrong implementation of javax.naming.Context.composeName
Product: Tomcat 4
Version: 4.1.31
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Catalina
AssignedTo: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: asfBugzilla.stratic@spamgourmet.com
The implementation of javax.naming.Context.composeName( Name, Name) is wrong and
return erroneous results.
In following classes:
- org.apache.naming.NamingContext
- org.apache.naming.BaseDirContext
- org.apache.naming.ProxyDirContext
- org.apache.naming.SelectorContext
The current implementation is:
public Name composeName(Name name, Name prefix)
throws NamingException {
prefix = (Name) name.clone(); // here is the error
return prefix.addAll(name);
}
So, on a Context ctx
A call like ctx.composeName("foo/bar", "example/prefix")
might return a Name like "example/prefix/foo/bar"
but actually return "foo/bar/foo/bar" !
The correct implementation is:
public Name composeName(Name name, Name prefix)
throws NamingException {
prefix = (Name) prefix.clone();
return prefix.addAll(name);
}
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org