You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@impala.apache.org by 吴朱华 <ik...@gmail.com> on 2016/12/16 03:42:42 UTC
Is there any plans for supporting UDAnF?
Hi guys:
Some of my clients are consider switching from vertica to impala, but they
really need the UDAnF to speed up the query. Is there any plans for
supporting UDAnF?^_^
Re: Is there any plans for supporting UDAnF?
Posted by 吴朱华 <ik...@gmail.com>.
Hi, alex
The current UDAnF we looking at is something about funnel chart, you can
see the detail at this link
<https://www.excelcampus.com/charts/excel-funnel-chart/>.
The situation is if we directly use SQL to do the funnel chart is very
complex and time consuming, and the plan for us is to do something
like UDAnF which process a bunch of tuples at one time when overing the
data to produce intermediate results. The UDAnf approach works very well
under vertica, and can we use default impala UDF/UDAF to imitate it?
Plus, the contributing thing is always on our radar^_^
2016-12-20 5:28 GMT+08:00 Alex Behm <al...@cloudera.com>:
> Hi!
>
> good question. Adding UDAnFs certainly seems useful, but we have no
> immediate plans of adding them. We're happy to help you contribute!
>
> May I ask what UDAnFs you are looking at? Perhaps there is a way to satisfy
> your use case without full-fledged support for UDAnFs.
>
> Alex
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 7:42 PM, 吴朱华 <ik...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys:
> >
> > Some of my clients are consider switching from vertica to impala, but
> they
> > really need the UDAnF to speed up the query. Is there any plans for
> > supporting UDAnF?^_^
> >
>
Re: Is there any plans for supporting UDAnF?
Posted by Alex Behm <al...@cloudera.com>.
Hi!
good question. Adding UDAnFs certainly seems useful, but we have no
immediate plans of adding them. We're happy to help you contribute!
May I ask what UDAnFs you are looking at? Perhaps there is a way to satisfy
your use case without full-fledged support for UDAnFs.
Alex
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 7:42 PM, 吴朱华 <ik...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys:
>
> Some of my clients are consider switching from vertica to impala, but they
> really need the UDAnF to speed up the query. Is there any plans for
> supporting UDAnF?^_^
>