NPE in DemandForwardingBridge

[Scott Frazier <sw...@swf.com>]

Hi,

    I'm a recent adopter of ActiveMQ 4.1.1 in a simple, two instance
"network of brokers" configuration.  I'm being burned by the
DemandForwardingBridge throwing an internal NPE and dying. I believe this is
the same issue as outlined in AMQ-1455.

    Has anyone else been burned by this and if so, any advice or
workarounds?  I can probably switch to a master/slave config in development,
but I'm definitely going to need interest-based routing at some point as we
add additional physical facilities.

                                            Thanks in advance,
                                                            S.

FW: NPE in DemandForwardingBridge

[Scott Frazier <sw...@swf.com>]

Hi,

Arrgh!  Accidentally hit the send button before I included this info..
Sorry.  I've got an simple pub/sub app that I'll forward along if I can
reliably recreate the issue.

JDK:        1.5.0_14
ActiveMQ    4.1.1
OS:         RHEL 5.

<transportConnectors>
  <transportConnector name="openwire"
uri="tcp://zend01.dev.manhunt.net:61616" discoveryUri="multicast://def
ault"/>
  </transportConnectors>
    
  <networkConnectors>
     <!-- by default just auto discover the other brokers -->
     <networkConnector name="default-nc" uri="multicast://default"/>
  </networkConnectors>


                                                Thanks again,
                                                            S.


------ Forwarded Message
From: Scott Frazier <sw...@swf.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:10:26 -0500
To: "users@activemq.apache.org" <us...@activemq.apache.org>
Conversation: NPE in DemandForwardingBridge
Subject: NPE in DemandForwardingBridge


Hi,

    I'm a recent adopter of ActiveMQ 4.1.1 in a simple, two instance
"network of brokers" configuration.  I'm being burned by the
DemandForwardingBridge throwing an internal NPE and dying. I believe this is
the same issue as outlined in AMQ-1455.

    Has anyone else been burned by this and if so, any advice or
workarounds?  I can probably switch to a master/slave config in development,
but I'm definitely going to need interest-based routing at some point as we
add additional physical facilities.

                                            Thanks in advance,
                                                            S.




------ End of Forwarded Message