You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> on 2006/07/11 16:44:38 UTC
Two SDO databindings?
We seem to have two versions of the sdo databinding in sandbox/
jboynes - sdo and databinding-sdo.
Which is the live one and can we remove the other?
Thanks
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Two SDO databindings?
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Frank Budinsky wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> I guess we're overdue to update the pom files for the SDO project.
> They
> should probably be changed to 1.0-SNAPSHOT. And the EMF dependencies
> should be updated to the EMF 2.2 release driver. That would be
> great if
> you would update them.
OK, will do - thanks. I'll open a JIRA for this as well.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Two SDO databindings?
Posted by Frank Budinsky <fr...@ca.ibm.com>.
Jeremy,
I guess we're overdue to update the pom files for the SDO project. They
should probably be changed to 1.0-SNAPSHOT. And the EMF dependencies
should be updated to the EMF 2.2 release driver. That would be great if
you would update them.
Thanks,
Frank
Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote on 07/11/2006 11:15:40 AM:
> That one does not build for me - problems locating the plugin and
> then problems with XMLStreamHelper which went away when I rebuilt sdo
> from the trunk.
>
> I fixed the plugin problem by adding in a pluginRepository.
>
> For SDO, the version in the pom in the trunk is still incubating-M1.
> If there have been changes in this tree then we should bump the
> version numbers to be a SNAPSHOT of the next release. SDO folks, is
> this the case and can you bump the version, or would you like me to
> help with updating the poms?
>
> --
> Jeremy
>
>
> On Jul 11, 2006, at 7:52 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
>
> > I believe it is databinding-sdo and not sdo. Raymond, can you confirm?
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> > On Jul 11, 2006, at 7:44 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> >
> >> We seem to have two versions of the sdo databinding in sandbox/
> >> jboynes - sdo and databinding-sdo.
> >> Which is the live one and can we remove the other?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> --
> >> Jeremy
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Two SDO databindings?
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
That one does not build for me - problems locating the plugin and
then problems with XMLStreamHelper which went away when I rebuilt sdo
from the trunk.
I fixed the plugin problem by adding in a pluginRepository.
For SDO, the version in the pom in the trunk is still incubating-M1.
If there have been changes in this tree then we should bump the
version numbers to be a SNAPSHOT of the next release. SDO folks, is
this the case and can you bump the version, or would you like me to
help with updating the poms?
--
Jeremy
On Jul 11, 2006, at 7:52 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
> I believe it is databinding-sdo and not sdo. Raymond, can you confirm?
>
> Jim
>
>
> On Jul 11, 2006, at 7:44 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
>> We seem to have two versions of the sdo databinding in sandbox/
>> jboynes - sdo and databinding-sdo.
>> Which is the live one and can we remove the other?
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Jeremy
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Two SDO databindings?
Posted by Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com>.
I believe it is databinding-sdo and not sdo. Raymond, can you confirm?
Jim
On Jul 11, 2006, at 7:44 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> We seem to have two versions of the sdo databinding in sandbox/
> jboynes - sdo and databinding-sdo.
> Which is the live one and can we remove the other?
>
> Thanks
> --
> Jeremy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org