You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Tobias Bocanegra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/07/03 19:55:34 UTC

[jira] [Moved] (JCRVLT-53) vlt: with many child nodes, NodeNameList.restoreOrder is very slow with Oak

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-53?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Tobias Bocanegra moved JCR-3793 to JCRVLT-53:
---------------------------------------------

        Key: JCRVLT-53  (was: JCR-3793)
    Project: Jackrabbit FileVault  (was: Jackrabbit Content Repository)

> vlt: with many child nodes, NodeNameList.restoreOrder is very slow with Oak
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCRVLT-53
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-53
>             Project: Jackrabbit FileVault
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>            Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>         Attachments: JCR-3793.patch, ReorderTest.java
>
>
> The method org.apache.jackrabbit.vault.fs.api.NodeNameList.restoreOrder re-orders orderable child nodes by using Node.orderBefore. This is very slow if there are many child nodes, specially with Oak (minutes for 10'000 nodes, while only about 1 second for Jackrabbit 2.x).
> [~tripod], I wonder if a possible solution is to first check whether re-ordering is needed? For example using:
> {noformat}
>     boolean isOrdered(ArrayList<String> names, Node parent)
>             throws RepositoryException {
>         NodeIterator it1 = parent.getNodes();
>         for (Iterator<String> it2 = names.iterator(); it2.hasNext();) {
>             if (!it1.hasNext() || !it1.nextNode().getName().equals(it2.next())) {
>                 return false;
>             }
>         }
>         return !it1.hasNext();
>     }
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)