You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> on 2015/09/12 18:40:40 UTC
0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in the
upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the blockers
and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
Anything should be added/removed from this list?
We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
Thanks,
Jun
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Edward Ribeiro <ed...@gmail.com>.
Is KAFKA-1811 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1811> worth
considering for 0.9.0?
Thanks!
Eddie
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Jiangjie Qin <jq...@linkedin.com.invalid>
wrote:
> HI Jun,
>
> Can we also include KAFKA-2448 in 0.9 as well? We see this issue a few
> times before and that cause replica fetcher threads not startup.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
> the
> > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> blockers
> > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> >
> > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> >
> > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Edward Ribeiro <ed...@gmail.com>.
Is KAFKA-1811 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1811> worth
considering for 0.9.0?
Thanks!
Eddie
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Jiangjie Qin <jq...@linkedin.com.invalid>
wrote:
> HI Jun,
>
> Can we also include KAFKA-2448 in 0.9 as well? We see this issue a few
> times before and that cause replica fetcher threads not startup.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
> the
> > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> blockers
> > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> >
> > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> >
> > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Jiangjie Qin <jq...@linkedin.com.INVALID>.
HI Jun,
Can we also include KAFKA-2448 in 0.9 as well? We see this issue a few
times before and that cause replica fetcher threads not startup.
Thanks,
Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in the
> upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the blockers
> and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
>
> Anything should be added/removed from this list?
>
> We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io>.
We decided to rename 0.8.3 to 0.9.0 since it contains few large changes
(Security, new consumer, quotas).
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
> Hi Jun,
>
> Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move straight
> to 0.9.0.0)?
>
> Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
> the
> > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> blockers
> > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> >
> > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> >
> > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io>.
We decided to rename 0.8.3 to 0.9.0 since it contains few large changes
(Security, new consumer, quotas).
On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
> Hi Jun,
>
> Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move straight
> to 0.9.0.0)?
>
> Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
> the
> > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> blockers
> > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> >
> > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> >
> > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io>.
Agree that these are very nice to have. We've seen many deployments that
need to manage these on their own.
However, if this is not ready before we are done adding security and the
new consumer, it will make sense to still release 0.9.0 and add the broker
management improvements in 0.9.1. I'm trying to say: these are really nice
to have, but not blockers for the release.
Feel free to set "Fixed Version" to 0.9.0 if you are confident this will be
done in the next few weeks. Otherwise, perhaps a later version or just
leave empty for now.
Gwen
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jun,
>
> Would be nice to have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2106 (if
> not that, than related https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1792 )
> in 0.9 release. Both have patch provided. If KAFKA-2106 is delivered, maybe
> KAFKA-1792 is redundant, not needed.
>
> For some reason KAFKA-2106 has "Affects Version/s" set to 0.9, maybe "Fix
> Version/s" should be set to that value instead.
>
> Kind regards,
> Stevo Slavic.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Jason,
> >
> > Maybe this answers your question:
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Stevo Slavic.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jun,
> >>
> >> Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move
> straight
> >> to 0.9.0.0)?
> >>
> >> Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >>
> >> > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
> >> the
> >> > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> >> blockers
> >> > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> >> >
> >> > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> >> >
> >> > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Jun
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Gwen Shapira <gw...@confluent.io>.
Agree that these are very nice to have. We've seen many deployments that
need to manage these on their own.
However, if this is not ready before we are done adding security and the
new consumer, it will make sense to still release 0.9.0 and add the broker
management improvements in 0.9.1. I'm trying to say: these are really nice
to have, but not blockers for the release.
Feel free to set "Fixed Version" to 0.9.0 if you are confident this will be
done in the next few weeks. Otherwise, perhaps a later version or just
leave empty for now.
Gwen
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jun,
>
> Would be nice to have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2106 (if
> not that, than related https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1792 )
> in 0.9 release. Both have patch provided. If KAFKA-2106 is delivered, maybe
> KAFKA-1792 is redundant, not needed.
>
> For some reason KAFKA-2106 has "Affects Version/s" set to 0.9, maybe "Fix
> Version/s" should be set to that value instead.
>
> Kind regards,
> Stevo Slavic.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Jason,
> >
> > Maybe this answers your question:
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Stevo Slavic.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jun,
> >>
> >> Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move
> straight
> >> to 0.9.0.0)?
> >>
> >> Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Jason
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >>
> >> > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
> >> the
> >> > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> >> blockers
> >> > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> >> >
> >> > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> >> >
> >> > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Jun
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>.
Jun,
Would be nice to have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2106 (if
not that, than related https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1792 )
in 0.9 release. Both have patch provided. If KAFKA-2106 is delivered, maybe
KAFKA-1792 is redundant, not needed.
For some reason KAFKA-2106 has "Affects Version/s" set to 0.9, maybe "Fix
Version/s" should be set to that value instead.
Kind regards,
Stevo Slavic.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Jason,
>
> Maybe this answers your question:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Kind regards,
> Stevo Slavic.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jun,
>>
>> Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move straight
>> to 0.9.0.0)?
>>
>> Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>>
>> > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
>> the
>> > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
>> blockers
>> > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
>> >
>> > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
>> >
>> > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Jun
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>.
Jun,
Would be nice to have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2106 (if
not that, than related https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1792 )
in 0.9 release. Both have patch provided. If KAFKA-2106 is delivered, maybe
KAFKA-1792 is redundant, not needed.
For some reason KAFKA-2106 has "Affects Version/s" set to 0.9, maybe "Fix
Version/s" should be set to that value instead.
Kind regards,
Stevo Slavic.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Jason,
>
> Maybe this answers your question:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Kind regards,
> Stevo Slavic.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jun,
>>
>> Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move straight
>> to 0.9.0.0)?
>>
>> Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Jason
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>>
>> > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
>> the
>> > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
>> blockers
>> > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
>> >
>> > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
>> >
>> > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Jun
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com>.
I made a pass of those.
KAFKA-2106 and KAFKA-1792 are related to improving the replica assignment.
Since they likely involve a KIP discussion, it's probably too late to
include them in 0.9.0.0.
KAFKA-2434: This is on the old consumer. Any improvement that we do should
probably be on the new consumer.
None of the rest of the jiras seems to be a blocker to me though. We can
include them if they get fixed before 0.9.0.0, but we probably won't wait
for them to be fixed.
Thanks,
Jun
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Do we want to deprecate anything before 0.9.0 is released? Maybe the old
> producer?
>
> Ismael
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Dong Lin <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey Jun,
> >
> > Should we also include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2390
> in
> > 0.9.0? Becket told me that this is one of those patches (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2387) needed for new
> consumer
> > API.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dong
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'd be interested to see:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2434 (has patch
> available,
> > we
> > > will be using 'old' consumer for some time)
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2125 (seems rather
> serious,
> > > unclear if no longer relevant with new code?)
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2222 (seems important to
> > fix)
> > >
> > > Jason
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yep,
> > > >
> > > > It looks like this was only communicated originally to the dev list
> > (and
> > > > not the users list), so it wasn't obvious to all!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Jason
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello Jason,
> > > >>
> > > >> Maybe this answers your question:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >>
> > > >> Kind regards,
> > > >> Stevo Slavic.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Jun,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move
> > > >> straight
> > > >> > to 0.9.0.0)?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Jason
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to
> > complete
> > > in
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all
> the
> > > >> > blockers
> > > >> > > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early
> October.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Jun
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Jun Rao <ju...@gmail.com>.
I made a pass of those.
KAFKA-2106 and KAFKA-1792 are related to improving the replica assignment.
Since they likely involve a KIP discussion, it's probably too late to
include them in 0.9.0.0.
KAFKA-2434: This is on the old consumer. Any improvement that we do should
probably be on the new consumer.
None of the rest of the jiras seems to be a blocker to me though. We can
include them if they get fixed before 0.9.0.0, but we probably won't wait
for them to be fixed.
Thanks,
Jun
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Do we want to deprecate anything before 0.9.0 is released? Maybe the old
> producer?
>
> Ismael
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Dong Lin <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey Jun,
> >
> > Should we also include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2390
> in
> > 0.9.0? Becket told me that this is one of those patches (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2387) needed for new
> consumer
> > API.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dong
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'd be interested to see:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2434 (has patch
> available,
> > we
> > > will be using 'old' consumer for some time)
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2125 (seems rather
> serious,
> > > unclear if no longer relevant with new code?)
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2222 (seems important to
> > fix)
> > >
> > > Jason
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yep,
> > > >
> > > > It looks like this was only communicated originally to the dev list
> > (and
> > > > not the users list), so it wasn't obvious to all!
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Jason
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello Jason,
> > > >>
> > > >> Maybe this answers your question:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > >>
> > > >> Kind regards,
> > > >> Stevo Slavic.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Jun,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move
> > > >> straight
> > > >> > to 0.9.0.0)?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Jason
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to
> > complete
> > > in
> > > >> > the
> > > >> > > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all
> the
> > > >> > blockers
> > > >> > > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early
> October.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Thanks,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Jun
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>.
Do we want to deprecate anything before 0.9.0 is released? Maybe the old
producer?
Ismael
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Dong Lin <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Jun,
>
> Should we also include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2390 in
> 0.9.0? Becket told me that this is one of those patches (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2387) needed for new consumer
> API.
>
> Thanks,
> Dong
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'd be interested to see:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2434 (has patch available,
> we
> > will be using 'old' consumer for some time)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2125 (seems rather serious,
> > unclear if no longer relevant with new code?)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2222 (seems important to
> fix)
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Yep,
> > >
> > > It looks like this was only communicated originally to the dev list
> (and
> > > not the users list), so it wasn't obvious to all!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jason
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello Jason,
> > >>
> > >> Maybe this answers your question:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >>
> > >> Kind regards,
> > >> Stevo Slavic.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Jun,
> > >> >
> > >> > Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move
> > >> straight
> > >> > to 0.9.0.0)?
> > >> >
> > >> > Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> >
> > >> > Jason
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to
> complete
> > in
> > >> > the
> > >> > > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> > >> > blockers
> > >> > > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Jun
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>.
Do we want to deprecate anything before 0.9.0 is released? Maybe the old
producer?
Ismael
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Dong Lin <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Jun,
>
> Should we also include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2390 in
> 0.9.0? Becket told me that this is one of those patches (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2387) needed for new consumer
> API.
>
> Thanks,
> Dong
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'd be interested to see:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2434 (has patch available,
> we
> > will be using 'old' consumer for some time)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2125 (seems rather serious,
> > unclear if no longer relevant with new code?)
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2222 (seems important to
> fix)
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Yep,
> > >
> > > It looks like this was only communicated originally to the dev list
> (and
> > > not the users list), so it wasn't obvious to all!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jason
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello Jason,
> > >>
> > >> Maybe this answers your question:
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >>
> > >> Kind regards,
> > >> Stevo Slavic.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Jun,
> > >> >
> > >> > Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move
> > >> straight
> > >> > to 0.9.0.0)?
> > >> >
> > >> > Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks,
> > >> >
> > >> > Jason
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to
> complete
> > in
> > >> > the
> > >> > > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> > >> > blockers
> > >> > > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Jun
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Dong Lin <li...@gmail.com>.
Hey Jun,
Should we also include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2390 in
0.9.0? Becket told me that this is one of those patches (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2387) needed for new consumer
API.
Thanks,
Dong
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
> I'd be interested to see:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2434 (has patch available, we
> will be using 'old' consumer for some time)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2125 (seems rather serious,
> unclear if no longer relevant with new code?)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2222 (seems important to fix)
>
> Jason
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
>
> > Yep,
> >
> > It looks like this was only communicated originally to the dev list (and
> > not the users list), so it wasn't obvious to all!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Jason,
> >>
> >> Maybe this answers your question:
> >>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Stevo Slavic.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Jun,
> >> >
> >> > Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move
> >> straight
> >> > to 0.9.0.0)?
> >> >
> >> > Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Jason
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete
> in
> >> > the
> >> > > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> >> > blockers
> >> > > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> >> > >
> >> > > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> >> > >
> >> > > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > >
> >> > > Jun
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Dong Lin <li...@gmail.com>.
Hey Jun,
Should we also include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2390 in
0.9.0? Becket told me that this is one of those patches (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2387) needed for new consumer
API.
Thanks,
Dong
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
> I'd be interested to see:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2434 (has patch available, we
> will be using 'old' consumer for some time)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2125 (seems rather serious,
> unclear if no longer relevant with new code?)
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2222 (seems important to fix)
>
> Jason
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
>
> > Yep,
> >
> > It looks like this was only communicated originally to the dev list (and
> > not the users list), so it wasn't obvious to all!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hello Jason,
> >>
> >> Maybe this answers your question:
> >>
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Stevo Slavic.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Jun,
> >> >
> >> > Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move
> >> straight
> >> > to 0.9.0.0)?
> >> >
> >> > Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Jason
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete
> in
> >> > the
> >> > > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> >> > blockers
> >> > > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> >> > >
> >> > > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> >> > >
> >> > > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > >
> >> > > Jun
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>.
I'd be interested to see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2434 (has patch available, we
will be using 'old' consumer for some time)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2125 (seems rather serious,
unclear if no longer relevant with new code?)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2222 (seems important to fix)
Jason
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
> Yep,
>
> It looks like this was only communicated originally to the dev list (and
> not the users list), so it wasn't obvious to all!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Jason,
>>
>> Maybe this answers your question:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Stevo Slavic.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Jun,
>> >
>> > Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move
>> straight
>> > to 0.9.0.0)?
>> >
>> > Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Jason
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>> >
>> > > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
>> > the
>> > > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
>> > blockers
>> > > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
>> > >
>> > > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
>> > >
>> > > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Jun
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>.
I'd be interested to see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2434 (has patch available, we
will be using 'old' consumer for some time)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2125 (seems rather serious,
unclear if no longer relevant with new code?)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2222 (seems important to fix)
Jason
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
> Yep,
>
> It looks like this was only communicated originally to the dev list (and
> not the users list), so it wasn't obvious to all!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Jason,
>>
>> Maybe this answers your question:
>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Stevo Slavic.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Jun,
>> >
>> > Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move
>> straight
>> > to 0.9.0.0)?
>> >
>> > Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Jason
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>> >
>> > > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
>> > the
>> > > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
>> > blockers
>> > > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
>> > >
>> > > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
>> > >
>> > > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > >
>> > > Jun
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>.
Yep,
It looks like this was only communicated originally to the dev list (and
not the users list), so it wasn't obvious to all!
Thanks,
Jason
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Jason,
>
> Maybe this answers your question:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Kind regards,
> Stevo Slavic.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jun,
> >
> > Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move
> straight
> > to 0.9.0.0)?
> >
> > Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
> > the
> > > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> > blockers
> > > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> > >
> > > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> > >
> > > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>.
Yep,
It looks like this was only communicated originally to the dev list (and
not the users list), so it wasn't obvious to all!
Thanks,
Jason
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Jason,
>
> Maybe this answers your question:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Kind regards,
> Stevo Slavic.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jun,
> >
> > Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move
> straight
> > to 0.9.0.0)?
> >
> > Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
> > the
> > > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> > blockers
> > > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> > >
> > > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> > >
> > > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Jun
> > >
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>.
Hello Jason,
Maybe this answers your question:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Kind regards,
Stevo Slavic.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
> Hi Jun,
>
> Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move straight
> to 0.9.0.0)?
>
> Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
> the
> > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> blockers
> > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> >
> > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> >
> > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Stevo Slavić <ss...@gmail.com>.
Hello Jason,
Maybe this answers your question:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201509.mbox/%3CCAFc58G-UScVKrSF1kdsowQ8Y96OAaZEdiZsk40G8fwf7iToFaw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Kind regards,
Stevo Slavic.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com> wrote:
> Hi Jun,
>
> Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move straight
> to 0.9.0.0)?
>
> Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in
> the
> > upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the
> blockers
> > and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
> >
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
> >
> > Anything should be added/removed from this list?
> >
> > We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jun
> >
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>.
Hi Jun,
Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move straight
to 0.9.0.0)?
Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
Thanks,
Jason
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in the
> upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the blockers
> and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
>
> Anything should be added/removed from this list?
>
> We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Jason Rosenberg <jb...@squareup.com>.
Hi Jun,
Can you clarify, will there not be a 0.8.3.0 (and instead we move straight
to 0.9.0.0)?
Also, can you outline the man new features/updates for 0.9.0.0?
Thanks,
Jason
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in the
> upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the blockers
> and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
>
> Anything should be added/removed from this list?
>
> We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Jiangjie Qin <jq...@linkedin.com.INVALID>.
HI Jun,
Can we also include KAFKA-2448 in 0.9 as well? We see this issue a few
times before and that cause replica fetcher threads not startup.
Thanks,
Jiangjie (Becket) Qin
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Jun Rao <ju...@confluent.io> wrote:
> The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in the
> upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the blockers
> and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
>
> Anything should be added/removed from this list?
>
> We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Edward Ribeiro <ed...@gmail.com>.
Excuse me, I'd put my issue in this list on the backburner, but resuming
work on it this week.
Cheers,
Eddie
Em 12/09/2015 13:40, "Jun Rao" <ju...@confluent.io> escreveu:
> The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in the
> upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the blockers
> and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
>
> Anything should be added/removed from this list?
>
> We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>
Re: 0.9.0.0 remaining jiras
Posted by Edward Ribeiro <ed...@gmail.com>.
Excuse me, I'd put my issue in this list on the backburner, but resuming
work on it this week.
Cheers,
Eddie
Em 12/09/2015 13:40, "Jun Rao" <ju...@confluent.io> escreveu:
> The following is a candidate list of jiras that we want to complete in the
> upcoming release (0.9.0.0). Our goal is to finish at least all the blockers
> and as many as the non-blockers possible in that list.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.9.0.0
>
> Anything should be added/removed from this list?
>
> We are shooting to cut an 0.9.0.0 release branch in early October.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jun
>