You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Lalit Nagpal <la...@rediffmail.com> on 2006/06/21 10:53:07 UTC
Which Open source MOM
HI,
I am in the hunt of an Open source MOM ... I am not sure which one is widely
popular and best.
Kindly suggest a location which could give me a comparison for the various
open source MOM options available. It should have C++ support.
Can anybody tell me why we should use ActiveMQ ... what are the prime
benefits of this MOM please.
Thanks in advance
Lalit ...
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-Open-source-MOM-t1822625.html#a4970466
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Which Open source MOM
Posted by amerigo5 <am...@hotmail.com>.
Add Open Message Queue (https://mq.dev.java.net/) from Glassfish/SJAS to the
list.
romje_mentorj wrote:
>
> Hi Lalit,
> it's a very interesting question...
> Anser can guided by some more information:
> - what is your context of JMS usage ? J2EE or stand-alone mode (mix of
> both solutions)
>
> What are the available products ?
> JORAM from Objectweb : rock solid , permit many deployments options even
> in embedded contexts, persistance solution is not bad & architecture quite
> complex...
> OpenJMS (sourceforge project) : very nice for first steps but too simple
> for production aware applications
> JBOSS MQ : not usable in stand alone (rewriting will permit succh use
> case)
> ActiveMQ of course
>
> may be some others???
>
> ActiveMQ architecture is quite sexy && enables what is the principal
> advantage of JMS: strong decoupling between applications with C++ clients
> connectors...It's quite young so don't have a strong experience of this
> product in production but TCP/IP config is very complete, many connectors
> & very ambitious persistance mode. So I can't see any bad thing with this
> prroduct. I will deploy it very soon in production here (customer site)..
>
> HTH
> Jerome
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-Open-source-MOM-t1822625.html#a4975549
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Which Open source MOM
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On 6/21/06, Lalit Nagpal <la...@rediffmail.com> wrote:
>
> Jerome-
>
> U know any website that gives a comparison of all the MOMs available ...
Here's a page providing a little info on comparing ActiveMQ to JBossMQ:
http://www.activemq.org/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-jbossmq.html
Here's a page providing some info on comparing ActiveMQ to JMS4Spread:
http://www.activemq.org/site/how-does-activemq-compare-to-spread-toolkit.html
Here's a page listing open source JMS implementations with just a bit
of commentary:
http://www.manageability.org/blog/stuff/open-source-jms-java
I'm sure there is more, but this is what I found by doing a quick
Google search.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
Castor - http://castor.org/
Re: Which Open source MOM
Posted by Lalit Nagpal <la...@rediffmail.com>.
Jerome-
U know any website that gives a comparison of all the MOMs available ...
Thanks a ton.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-Open-source-MOM-t1822625.html#a4973276
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Which Open source MOM
Posted by romje_mentorj <ro...@javaxpert.com>.
Lalit Nagpal wrote:
>
> Hi Jerome ...
>
> Thanks for coming to my rescue ... context would be J2EE ...
> We would generate Java, Python, .Net code using SWIG on the C++ layer (we
> would write this one) that would talk to MOM and thereby use the generated
> code with the various languages.
>
> Any inputs on what you think would be best for this environment. My
> requirements are - it should have C++ support and should be an open source
> MOM.
>
>
>
for these points of view ActiveMQ is a very good choice...
Any inputs on XMLBlaster ....
not used since several years, worked nicely but it's a proprietary solution
so don't
offer you the trick to simply change the configuration to use another
implementation..
I 'm really convinced that JMS is the right tool for this job...So any good
JMS implementation is your friend ...:)
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-Open-source-MOM-t1822625.html#a4973215
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Which Open source MOM
Posted by Lalit Nagpal <la...@rediffmail.com>.
Hi Jerome ...
Thanks for coming to my rescue ... context would be J2EE ...
We would generate Java, Python, .Net code using SWIG on the C++ layer (we
would write this one) that would talk to MOM and thereby use the generated
code with the various languages.
Any inputs on what you think would be best for this environment. My
requirements are - it should have C++ support and should be an open source
MOM.
Thanks
Lalit Nagpal
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-Open-source-MOM-t1822625.html#a4972892
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Which Open source MOM
Posted by romje_mentorj <ro...@javaxpert.com>.
Hi Lalit,
it's a very interesting question...
Anser can guided by some more information:
- what is your context of JMS usage ? J2EE or stand-alone mode (mix of both
solutions)
What are the available products ?
JORAM from Objectweb : rock solid , permit many deployments options even in
embedded contexts, persistance solution is not bad & architecture quite
complex...
OpenJMS (sourceforge project) : very nice for first steps but too simple for
production aware applications
JBOSS MQ : not usable in stand alone (rewriting will permit succh use case)
ActiveMQ of course
may be some others???
ActiveMQ architecture is quite sexy && enables what is the principal
advantage of JMS: strong decoupling between applications with C++ clients
connectors...It's quite young so don't have a strong experience of this
product in production but TCP/IP config is very complete, many connectors &
very ambitious persistance mode. So I can't see any bad thing with this
prroduct. I will deploy it very soon in production here (customer site)..
HTH
Jerome
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-Open-source-MOM-t1822625.html#a4971588
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Which Open source MOM
Posted by Lalit Nagpal <la...@rediffmail.com>.
Thanks a ton for all the help ... any more inputs will be most welcome.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-Open-source-MOM-t1822625.html#a4989997
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.
Re: Which Open source MOM
Posted by romje_mentorj <ro...@javaxpert.com>.
Lalit Nagpal wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> I am in the hunt of an Open source MOM ... I am not sure which one is
> widely popular and best.
>
> Kindly suggest a location which could give me a comparison for the various
> open source MOM options available. It should have C++ support.
>
> Can anybody tell me why we should use ActiveMQ ... what are the prime
> benefits of this MOM please.
>
>
>
>
You should first . know that MOM & Open Source is a quite recent love song,
because MOM (MQ-Series or Tuxedo) are old components in huge infrastructures
(bank/telecom)...
In the Java world JMs is the standard for implementing Point to Point or
Pub/Sub messaging paradigms (Request /Response one is not supported)..
JMs can provide you :
- decoupling (with support for different clients)
- independance from vendor (just change your config to switch from one tool
to another)
ActiveMQ will bring you:
* C++ connector (and different other languages like ruby/python/PHP)
* Open Source
* clean architecture
* good internal design ==> several deployment options
Good choice
Jerome
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Which-Open-source-MOM-t1822625.html#a4973617
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User forum at Nabble.com.