You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ranger.apache.org by "Madhan Neethiraj (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/09 00:34:40 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (RANGER-880) Good coding practice: inner class to be made static; wait() should be in a loop

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15186070#comment-15186070 ] 

Madhan Neethiraj commented on RANGER-880:
-----------------------------------------

Review board URL: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44538/

> Good coding practice: inner class to be made static; wait() should be in a loop
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RANGER-880
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-880
>             Project: Ranger
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tagsync
>    Affects Versions: 0.6.0
>            Reporter: Madhan Neethiraj
>            Assignee: Madhan Neethiraj
>             Fix For: 0.6.0
>
>         Attachments: 0001-RANGER-880-good-coding-practive-inner-class-to-be-ma.patch
>
>
> 1) Inner class TagAdminRESTSink.UploadWorkItem should be made static - as it doesn't need access to enclosing class members.
> 2) .wait() method should be called within a loop - to handle possible interrupts and spurious wakes - see Java doc for Object.wait() for details.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)