Re: [VOTE] Moving iota to 'attic' status

[Gunnar Tapper <ta...@gmail.com>]

+1

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:10 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just want to point out.  Podlings retire, they don't go to the attic.  The
> same concepts apply though.
>
> John
>
> On 2017-11-07 20:25, Tony Faustini <to...@litbit.com> wrote:
> > Hi, we have had several  days to get feedback on whether or not to move
> the iota podling to ‘attic’ status. There has been some interest in keeping
> the project alive but a number of the principal committers have suggested
> that the project be moved to ‘attic’ status. Moving the project to the
> attic status doesn’t mean that the source code is unavailable nor does it
> mean that a community cannot be build around such a project. Perhaps Justin
> or Hadrian could give some guidance on working and building community
> around a project that is in the ‘attic’?
> >
> > Based on the feedback I am putting the question of moving iota to
> ‘attic’ status to a vote.
> >
> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 move iota to attic status
> > [ ] -1 Do not move iota to attic status because ...
> >
> > Thanks
> > -Tony
> >
> > > On Oct 31, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Barbara Malta Gomes <
> barbaramaltagomes@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I recommend moving the project to Attic as well.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 9:44 AM, <rutvij.clerk@icloud.com <mailto:
> rutvij.clerk@icloud.com>> wrote:
> > > I recommend moving the project to Attic in its current state.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Rutvij
> > >
> > > On Oct 31, 2017, 7:02 AM -0700, Sandeep Purohit <phalodi@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>>, wrote:
> > >> Hi All, We have to move forward as a podling project. I am interested
> in this project, Please make this project alive again. Anyone have design
> documents and any information related to this project then we all should
> make this project active again.
> > >>
> > >> -Sandeep
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Gunnar Tapper <
> tapper.gunnar@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >> My suggestion is to place the project in the attic at this point.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Gunnar
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Xi Chen <neilchenxi@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >> Hi, All,
> > >>
> > >> This is Neil, I am new to the software engineering industry and I am
> interested in this project, and hope to make contribute to this project.
> > >> As I am new to this project, I don’t know how to begin with it. If
> some of you still got interests in this project, I hope you guys can reply
> this email, I need your help to learn more about this project.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Neil
> > >>
> > >> > On Oct 30, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Tony Faustini <tony@litbit.com
> <ma...@litbit.com>> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi all, I am not seeing a lot of activity on this project in the
> last few months. I would like to start a discussion on whether or not to
> dissolve the PMC and move the project to the Attic. This doesn’t
> necessarily mean that the project cannot re-emerge at a future time as an
> ASF project. It would be shelved in the attic for now. The source code
> would still be available under the Apache license as is the case with many
> open source projects. Perhaps a community will emerge in the near future
> and we the project can be moved back to the ASF podling process.
> > >> >
> > >> > On the other hand if you want to keep the project moving forward as
> a podling project and you feel you have the time to volunteer please
> respond to this thread explaining how you can help.
> > >> >
> > >> > I am proposing that we discuss the Attic question for a few days
> and based on the feedback we either
> > >> >
> > >> > 1) Have enough volunteers to move this forward as a podling project
> > >> >
> > >> > or
> > >> >
> > >> > 2) We conduct a vote to dissolve the PMC and move the project to
> the Attic
> > >> >
> > >> > I look forward to your feedback.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks
> > >> >
> > >> > -Tony
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Gunnar
> > >> If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Barbara Gomes
> > > Computer Engineer
> > > San Jose, CA
> >
> >
>



-- 
Thanks,

Gunnar
*If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*