You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@tuscany.apache.org by binhnt22 <Bi...@viettel.com.vn> on 2012/08/06 10:58:39 UTC
Is Tuscany SCA still growing?
Hi all,
I'm looking for an open source tool to build a SOA application. And SCA is
seemed to be a good candidate.
But I noticed that the mail-list was poor, the latest release was published
one year ago.
My question is: "Is Tuscany SCA alive and continue growing?"
Best regards,
Re: Is Tuscany SCA still growing?
Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:45 PM, binhnt22 <Bi...@viettel.com.vn> wrote:
> Thanks Raymond,
>
> I checked it yesterday and 2.0 distributions were really ready.
>
> However the central maven repository doesn't have any 2.0.RC1 lib yet.
>
>
Maven should have <version>2.0</version>
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
RE: Is Tuscany SCA still growing?
Posted by binhnt22 <Bi...@viettel.com.vn>.
Thanks Raymond,
I checked it yesterday and 2.0 distributions were really ready.
However the central maven repository doesn't have any 2.0.RC1 lib yet.
Best regards
Binh, Nguyen Thanh
Cell phone: (+84)982260622
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Nash [mailto:nash@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:38 PM
To: user@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is Tuscany SCA still growing?
Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tuscany is alive and kicking :-).
>
> We recently released 2.0. Please check it out.
>
Is there a download link for this on the Tuscany website? The latest release that I could find is SCA Java 2.0-Beta3 (July, 2011).
Simon
> The development activity
> is a bit slow as the code base is pretty stable now, which is a good
> sign for adoption :). We still actively fix bugs and enhance the code
> based on user feedbacks.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Aug 6, 2012, at 1:58 AM, binhnt22 <Binhnt22@viettel.com.vn
> <ma...@viettel.com.vn>> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m looking for an open source tool to build a SOA application. And
>> SCA is seemed to be a good candidate.
>>
>> But I noticed that the mail-list was poor, the latest release was
>> published one year ago.
>>
>> My question is: “Is Tuscany SCA alive and continue growing?”
>>
>>
>>
>> /Best regards,/
>>
>>
>>
Re: Is Tuscany SCA still growing?
Posted by Simon Nash <na...@apache.org>.
Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tuscany is alive and kicking :-).
>
> We recently released 2.0. Please check it out.
>
Is there a download link for this on the Tuscany website? The latest
release that I could find is SCA Java 2.0-Beta3 (July, 2011).
Simon
> The development activity
> is a bit slow as the code base is pretty stable now, which is a good
> sign for adoption :). We still actively fix bugs and enhance the code
> based on user feedbacks.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Aug 6, 2012, at 1:58 AM, binhnt22 <Binhnt22@viettel.com.vn
> <ma...@viettel.com.vn>> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m looking for an open source tool to build a SOA application. And
>> SCA is seemed to be a good candidate.
>>
>> But I noticed that the mail-list was poor, the latest release was
>> published one year ago.
>>
>> My question is: “Is Tuscany SCA alive and continue growing?”
>>
>>
>>
>> /Best regards,/
>>
>>
>>
Re: Is Tuscany SCA still growing?
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Tuscany is alive and kicking :-).
We recently released 2.0. Please check it out. The development activity is a bit slow as the code base is pretty stable now, which is a good sign for adoption :). We still actively fix bugs and enhance the code based on user feedbacks.
Thanks,
Raymond
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 6, 2012, at 1:58 AM, binhnt22 <Bi...@viettel.com.vn> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I��m looking for an open source tool to build a SOA application. And SCA is seemed to be a good candidate.
> But I noticed that the mail-list was poor, the latest release was published one year ago.
> My question is: ��Is Tuscany SCA alive and continue growing?��
>
> Best regards,
>