You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by tr...@apache.org on 2005/02/09 18:35:09 UTC
svn commit: r153092 - httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.html.en
httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.xml
Author: trawick
Date: Wed Feb 9 09:35:05 2005
New Revision: 153092
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=153092
Log:
fix function name in developer doc
PR: 33438
Submitted by: Bojan Smojver
Reviewed by: Jeff Trawick
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.html.en
httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.xml
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.html.en
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.html.en?view=diff&r1=153091&r2=153092
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.html.en (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.html.en Wed Feb 9 09:35:05 2005
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
behavior. As patches were introduced to 2.0, these
optimizations (and the server behavior) were quickly broken due
to this duplication of code. All duplicate code has been folded
- back into <code>ap_process_internal_request()</code> to prevent
+ back into <code>ap_process_request_internal()</code> to prevent
the code from falling out of sync again.</p>
<p>This means that much of the existing code was 'unoptimized'.
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.xml?view=diff&r1=153091&r2=153092
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.xml (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/developer/request.xml Wed Feb 9 09:35:05 2005
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
behavior. As patches were introduced to 2.0, these
optimizations (and the server behavior) were quickly broken due
to this duplication of code. All duplicate code has been folded
- back into <code>ap_process_internal_request()</code> to prevent
+ back into <code>ap_process_request_internal()</code> to prevent
the code from falling out of sync again.</p>
<p>This means that much of the existing code was 'unoptimized'.