You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> on 2006/05/06 22:12:30 UTC
Do not check in code until further notice
I am migrating CVS now. Do not check in code until further notice.
As the CVS tarball from SF is old, I'll do a local merge of the HEAD
code into it. The worst scenario - we'll loose the last Beta tag - no
big deal. I recently did this operation with WOProject CVS - it
worked pretty well.
Andrus
On May 5, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
> My favorite part of SVN is the fact that the repository can easily
> evolve... directories are not only movable, but revision history is
> preserved. We can just branch when we're ready and change like crazy.
>
> I'm definitely +1
>
> On 5/5/06, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> Anonymous CVS @SF has been down since March. A number of users have
>> been complaining that they can't create patches or test their custom
>> changes because of that. The situation is not critical, but still
>> rather annoying.
>>
>> I am thinking maybe we should change our earlier decision to keep 1.2
>> on SF and move it to Apache SVN now (but of course still keep doing
>> releases from SF with the current package naming)?
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>
Re: JIRA->SVN links (Re: [DONE] Re: Do not check in code until further notice)
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Jeff,
I was about to ask you to do that. You are ahead of me :-)
Thanks
Andrus
On May 7, 2006, at 8:49 PM, Jeff Turner wrote:
> On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 11:03:02AM -0400, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> Migration is successfully completed. Check ins can resume to the new
>> location at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/main/
>> trunk/cayenne/
>
> I've enabled the JIRA Subversion integration. Eg:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-261?page=all
> http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-470?page=all
> http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-207?page=all
>
> There are plenty of examples, as Andrus has been very good about
> recording issue keys in commits.
>
>
> --Jeff
>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On May 6, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>> I am migrating CVS now. Do not check in code until further notice.
>>>
>>> As the CVS tarball from SF is old, I'll do a local merge of the
>>> HEAD code into it. The worst scenario - we'll loose the last Beta
>>> tag - no big deal. I recently did this operation with WOProject CVS
>>> - it worked pretty well.
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 5, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
>>>
>>>> My favorite part of SVN is the fact that the repository can easily
>>>> evolve... directories are not only movable, but revision history is
>>>> preserved. We can just branch when we're ready and change like
>>>> crazy.
>>>>
>>>> I'm definitely +1
>>>>
>>>> On 5/5/06, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>>>> Anonymous CVS @SF has been down since March. A number of users
>>>>> have
>>>>> been complaining that they can't create patches or test their
>>>>> custom
>>>>> changes because of that. The situation is not critical, but still
>>>>> rather annoying.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am thinking maybe we should change our earlier decision to keep
>>>>> 1.2
>>>>> on SF and move it to Apache SVN now (but of course still keep
>>>>> doing
>>>>> releases from SF with the current package naming)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
JIRA->SVN links (Re: [DONE] Re: Do not check in code until further notice)
Posted by Jeff Turner <je...@apache.org>.
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 11:03:02AM -0400, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Migration is successfully completed. Check ins can resume to the new
> location at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/main/
> trunk/cayenne/
I've enabled the JIRA Subversion integration. Eg:
http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-261?page=all
http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-470?page=all
http://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-207?page=all
There are plenty of examples, as Andrus has been very good about
recording issue keys in commits.
--Jeff
> Andrus
>
>
> On May 6, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> > I am migrating CVS now. Do not check in code until further notice.
> >
> > As the CVS tarball from SF is old, I'll do a local merge of the
> > HEAD code into it. The worst scenario - we'll loose the last Beta
> > tag - no big deal. I recently did this operation with WOProject CVS
> > - it worked pretty well.
> >
> > Andrus
> >
> >
> > On May 5, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
> >
> >> My favorite part of SVN is the fact that the repository can easily
> >> evolve... directories are not only movable, but revision history is
> >> preserved. We can just branch when we're ready and change like crazy.
> >>
> >> I'm definitely +1
> >>
> >> On 5/5/06, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> >>> Anonymous CVS @SF has been down since March. A number of users have
> >>> been complaining that they can't create patches or test their custom
> >>> changes because of that. The situation is not critical, but still
> >>> rather annoying.
> >>>
> >>> I am thinking maybe we should change our earlier decision to keep
> >>> 1.2
> >>> on SF and move it to Apache SVN now (but of course still keep doing
> >>> releases from SF with the current package naming)?
> >>>
> >>> Andrus
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
[DONE] Re: Do not check in code until further notice
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Migration is successfully completed. Check ins can resume to the new
location at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/cayenne/main/
trunk/cayenne/
Andrus
On May 6, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I am migrating CVS now. Do not check in code until further notice.
>
> As the CVS tarball from SF is old, I'll do a local merge of the
> HEAD code into it. The worst scenario - we'll loose the last Beta
> tag - no big deal. I recently did this operation with WOProject CVS
> - it worked pretty well.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On May 5, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Cris Daniluk wrote:
>
>> My favorite part of SVN is the fact that the repository can easily
>> evolve... directories are not only movable, but revision history is
>> preserved. We can just branch when we're ready and change like crazy.
>>
>> I'm definitely +1
>>
>> On 5/5/06, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>> Anonymous CVS @SF has been down since March. A number of users have
>>> been complaining that they can't create patches or test their custom
>>> changes because of that. The situation is not critical, but still
>>> rather annoying.
>>>
>>> I am thinking maybe we should change our earlier decision to keep
>>> 1.2
>>> on SF and move it to Apache SVN now (but of course still keep doing
>>> releases from SF with the current package naming)?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>
>
>