You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by Patrick Linskey <pl...@bea.com> on 2006/09/29 20:47:44 UTC
openjpa.zip
Hi,
Currently, the openjpa-<version>.zip that gets built in the
openjpa-project module contains all the individual module jars *and* the
openjpa-all-<version>.jar. Is this desirable / necessary? My feeling is
that the dist should contain just openjpa-all-<version>.jar, possibly
renamed to openjpa-<version>.jar.
Thoughts?
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
RE: openjpa.zip
Posted by Patrick Linskey <pl...@bea.com>.
Sounds good to me. Should be pretty straightforward -- we create a
special 'modules' dir for all the individual jars, so it should be as
easy as removing that bit of the appropriate pom.
-Patrick
--
Patrick Linskey
BEA Systems, Inc.
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Dick [mailto:michael.d.dick@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 11:35 AM
> To: open-jpa-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: openjpa.zip
>
> FWIW I'm happy to take a crack at this if we have enough
> approval to make a
> change. Should I go ahead and open a JIRA feature?
>
> -Michael Dick
>
> On 9/30/06, Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Agree. The openjpa-<version>.jar should be sufficient for
> distribution.
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > On 9/29/06, Patrick Linskey <pl...@bea.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Currently, the openjpa-<version>.zip that gets built in the
> > > openjpa-project module contains all the individual module
> jars *and* the
> > > openjpa-all-<version>.jar. Is this desirable / necessary?
> My feeling is
> > > that the dist should contain just
> openjpa-all-<version>.jar, possibly
> > > renamed to openjpa-<version>.jar.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > -Patrick
> > >
> > > --
> > > Patrick Linskey
> > > BEA Systems, Inc.
> > >
> > >
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> > > Notice: This email message, together with any
> attachments, may contain
> > > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries
> and affiliated
> > > entities, that may be confidential, proprietary,
> copyrighted and/or
> > > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of
> the individual
> > > or entity named in this message. If you are not the
> intended recipient,
> > > and have received this message in error, please
> immediately return this
> > > by email and then delete it.
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: openjpa.zip
Posted by Michael Dick <mi...@gmail.com>.
FWIW I'm happy to take a crack at this if we have enough approval to make a
change. Should I go ahead and open a JIRA feature?
-Michael Dick
On 9/30/06, Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Agree. The openjpa-<version>.jar should be sufficient for distribution.
>
> Kevin
>
> On 9/29/06, Patrick Linskey <pl...@bea.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Currently, the openjpa-<version>.zip that gets built in the
> > openjpa-project module contains all the individual module jars *and* the
> > openjpa-all-<version>.jar. Is this desirable / necessary? My feeling is
> > that the dist should contain just openjpa-all-<version>.jar, possibly
> > renamed to openjpa-<version>.jar.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > -Patrick
> >
> > --
> > Patrick Linskey
> > BEA Systems, Inc.
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
> > entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
> > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
> > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> > and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
> > by email and then delete it.
> >
>
>
Re: openjpa.zip
Posted by Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com>.
Agree. The openjpa-<version>.jar should be sufficient for distribution.
Kevin
On 9/29/06, Patrick Linskey <pl...@bea.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently, the openjpa-<version>.zip that gets built in the
> openjpa-project module contains all the individual module jars *and* the
> openjpa-all-<version>.jar. Is this desirable / necessary? My feeling is
> that the dist should contain just openjpa-all-<version>.jar, possibly
> renamed to openjpa-<version>.jar.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -Patrick
>
> --
> Patrick Linskey
> BEA Systems, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
> information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
> entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
> legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
> or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
> and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
> by email and then delete it.
>