You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> on 2006/06/19 15:24:01 UTC
[vote] Release commons-jelly-tags-interaction 1.1
I hereby request to vote about the release of the jelly subproject
"interaction tag library".
The details of the release plan are below.
I would like to please request a vote for 36 hours, ie. till Wednesday
14:00 GMT.
+1 [ ] yes, let's do it
0 [ ] let it happen... but I can't really check
-1 [ ] don't do it because...
thank you in advance.
paul
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Here's the plan:
> - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared
> - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no risk
> of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed).
> - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only produce
> jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the repo
> at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made.
> - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and
> project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit a jar
> upload to iblio's repo.
>
> I have assembled the following release candidates...
> - a site with RC1 version tag:
> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/
> - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject:
> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar
>
Re: [vote] Release commons-jelly-tags-interaction 1.1
Posted by Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>.
+1
While I disapprove of a jar only release, I think I'd prefer to get the
release out given the lack of Jelly committers.
Stephen
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> I hereby request to vote about the release of the jelly subproject
> "interaction tag library".
> The details of the release plan are below.
> I would like to please request a vote for 36 hours, ie. till Wednesday
> 14:00 GMT.
> +1 [ ] yes, let's do it
> 0 [ ] let it happen... but I can't really check
> -1 [ ] don't do it because...
>
> thank you in advance.
>
> paul
>
> Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>
>> Here's the plan:
>> - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared
>> - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no risk
>> of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed).
>> - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only produce
>> jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the repo
>> at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made.
>> - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and
>> project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit a jar
>> upload to iblio's repo.
>>
>> I have assembled the following release candidates...
>> - a site with RC1 version tag:
>> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/
>> - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject:
>> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [vote] Release commons-jelly-tags-interaction 1.1
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 6/19/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
> I hereby request to vote about the release of the jelly subproject
> "interaction tag library".
> The details of the release plan are below.
> I would like to please request a vote for 36 hours, ie. till Wednesday
> 14:00 GMT.
> +1 [ ] yes, let's do it
> 0 [ ] let it happen... but I can't really check
> -1 [ ] don't do it because...
>
> thank you in advance.
>
> paul
>
> Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> > Here's the plan:
> > - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared
> > - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no risk
> > of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed).
> > - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only produce
> > jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the repo
> > at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made.
> > - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and
> > project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit a jar
> > upload to iblio's repo.
> >
> > I have assembled the following release candidates...
> > - a site with RC1 version tag:
> > http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/
> > - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject:
> > http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar
> >
>
>
>
>
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is
afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [vote] Release commons-jelly-tags-interaction 1.1
Posted by Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com>.
Do you plan to deploy the sources with the new source plugin ?
http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/plugins/source/
Arnaud
On 6/21/06, Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ah. Sounds like something we should be fixing if that's the case.
>
> On 6/21/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
> > Maybe... I'll work on this tonight local time (in about 14 hours).
> > The problem is that "maven dist" calls the maven dist of jelly which is
> > quite wrong, I think... and I did not want to touch this yet.
> > If it sounds appropriate and someone can check my candidate sources I
> > could try this tonight before tagging.... it would only affect,
> > probably, the maven.xml in jelly/jelly-tags.
> >
> > paul
> >
> >
> > Dion Gillard wrote:
> > > Paul can we post the source/binary distribution release after getting
> > > the jar out?
> > >
> > > On 6/20/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
> > >> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > >> > Regardless of what Jelly has been doing in the past, IMO its a good
> > >> > idea to have source distributions for any release, given which one
> > >> > would be able to (atleast after meeting certain pre-requisites)
> > >> > effectively reproduce the release binaries. Why don't Jelly taglibs
> > >> > have accompanying source distros?
> > >> As a general wish, I only agree.
> > >> In this case both limit in time and the fact that this tag-library is
> > >> exactly made of one class tend me to not do so.
> > >> > Note we had a similar situation in Jakarta Taglibs which AFAICT has
> > >> > since been remedied. Also, a gentle reminder to please tag SVN (as
> > >> > previous Jelly releases have done).
> > >> Of course tagging was planned. Do you mean I should tag RC1 as well ?
> > >> > Since I've not participated in the discussion so far, and wasn't
> > >> > around to bring this up earlier for the last three days when the
> plan
> > >> > (below) was posted, I will vote 0. I will also encourage you to
> leave
> > >> > votes open for atleast 72 hours (instead of 36).
> > >> The fact that I sent this wish already long ago, with less clarity
> > >> indeed, pushes me here. And also, the fact that maven plugin release
> is
> > >> waiting.
> > >>
> > >> paul
> > >>
> > >> > Thank you for your time towards this release.
> > >> > -Rahul
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >> thank you in advance.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> paul
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> > >> >> > Here's the plan:
> > >> >> > - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared
> > >> >> > - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no
> > >> risk
> > >> >> > of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed).
> > >> >> > - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only
> produce
> > >> >> > jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the
> > >> repo
> > >> >> > at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made.
> > >> >> > - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and
> > >> >> > project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit
> > >> a jar
> > >> >> > upload to iblio's repo.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > I have assembled the following release candidates...
> > >> >> > - a site with RC1 version tag:
> > >> >> >
> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/
> > >> >> > - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >>
> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar
> > >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
> Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is
> afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: [vote] Release commons-jelly-tags-interaction 1.1
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
Ah. Sounds like something we should be fixing if that's the case.
On 6/21/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
> Maybe... I'll work on this tonight local time (in about 14 hours).
> The problem is that "maven dist" calls the maven dist of jelly which is
> quite wrong, I think... and I did not want to touch this yet.
> If it sounds appropriate and someone can check my candidate sources I
> could try this tonight before tagging.... it would only affect,
> probably, the maven.xml in jelly/jelly-tags.
>
> paul
>
>
> Dion Gillard wrote:
> > Paul can we post the source/binary distribution release after getting
> > the jar out?
> >
> > On 6/20/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
> >> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> >> > Regardless of what Jelly has been doing in the past, IMO its a good
> >> > idea to have source distributions for any release, given which one
> >> > would be able to (atleast after meeting certain pre-requisites)
> >> > effectively reproduce the release binaries. Why don't Jelly taglibs
> >> > have accompanying source distros?
> >> As a general wish, I only agree.
> >> In this case both limit in time and the fact that this tag-library is
> >> exactly made of one class tend me to not do so.
> >> > Note we had a similar situation in Jakarta Taglibs which AFAICT has
> >> > since been remedied. Also, a gentle reminder to please tag SVN (as
> >> > previous Jelly releases have done).
> >> Of course tagging was planned. Do you mean I should tag RC1 as well ?
> >> > Since I've not participated in the discussion so far, and wasn't
> >> > around to bring this up earlier for the last three days when the plan
> >> > (below) was posted, I will vote 0. I will also encourage you to leave
> >> > votes open for atleast 72 hours (instead of 36).
> >> The fact that I sent this wish already long ago, with less clarity
> >> indeed, pushes me here. And also, the fact that maven plugin release is
> >> waiting.
> >>
> >> paul
> >>
> >> > Thank you for your time towards this release.
> >> > -Rahul
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> thank you in advance.
> >> >>
> >> >> paul
> >> >>
> >> >> Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> >> >> > Here's the plan:
> >> >> > - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared
> >> >> > - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no
> >> risk
> >> >> > of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed).
> >> >> > - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only produce
> >> >> > jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the
> >> repo
> >> >> > at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made.
> >> >> > - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and
> >> >> > project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit
> >> a jar
> >> >> > upload to iblio's repo.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I have assembled the following release candidates...
> >> >> > - a site with RC1 version tag:
> >> >> > http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/
> >> >> > - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject:
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is
afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [vote] Release commons-jelly-tags-interaction 1.1
Posted by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org>.
Maybe... I'll work on this tonight local time (in about 14 hours).
The problem is that "maven dist" calls the maven dist of jelly which is
quite wrong, I think... and I did not want to touch this yet.
If it sounds appropriate and someone can check my candidate sources I
could try this tonight before tagging.... it would only affect,
probably, the maven.xml in jelly/jelly-tags.
paul
Dion Gillard wrote:
> Paul can we post the source/binary distribution release after getting
> the jar out?
>
> On 6/20/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
>> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> > Regardless of what Jelly has been doing in the past, IMO its a good
>> > idea to have source distributions for any release, given which one
>> > would be able to (atleast after meeting certain pre-requisites)
>> > effectively reproduce the release binaries. Why don't Jelly taglibs
>> > have accompanying source distros?
>> As a general wish, I only agree.
>> In this case both limit in time and the fact that this tag-library is
>> exactly made of one class tend me to not do so.
>> > Note we had a similar situation in Jakarta Taglibs which AFAICT has
>> > since been remedied. Also, a gentle reminder to please tag SVN (as
>> > previous Jelly releases have done).
>> Of course tagging was planned. Do you mean I should tag RC1 as well ?
>> > Since I've not participated in the discussion so far, and wasn't
>> > around to bring this up earlier for the last three days when the plan
>> > (below) was posted, I will vote 0. I will also encourage you to leave
>> > votes open for atleast 72 hours (instead of 36).
>> The fact that I sent this wish already long ago, with less clarity
>> indeed, pushes me here. And also, the fact that maven plugin release is
>> waiting.
>>
>> paul
>>
>> > Thank you for your time towards this release.
>> > -Rahul
>> >
>> >
>> >> thank you in advance.
>> >>
>> >> paul
>> >>
>> >> Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>> >> > Here's the plan:
>> >> > - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared
>> >> > - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no
>> risk
>> >> > of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed).
>> >> > - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only produce
>> >> > jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the
>> repo
>> >> > at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made.
>> >> > - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and
>> >> > project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit
>> a jar
>> >> > upload to iblio's repo.
>> >> >
>> >> > I have assembled the following release candidates...
>> >> > - a site with RC1 version tag:
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/
>> >> > - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject:
>> >> >
>> >>
>> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar
>>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [vote] Release commons-jelly-tags-interaction 1.1
Posted by Dion Gillard <di...@gmail.com>.
Paul can we post the source/binary distribution release after getting
the jar out?
On 6/20/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> > Regardless of what Jelly has been doing in the past, IMO its a good
> > idea to have source distributions for any release, given which one
> > would be able to (atleast after meeting certain pre-requisites)
> > effectively reproduce the release binaries. Why don't Jelly taglibs
> > have accompanying source distros?
> As a general wish, I only agree.
> In this case both limit in time and the fact that this tag-library is
> exactly made of one class tend me to not do so.
> > Note we had a similar situation in Jakarta Taglibs which AFAICT has
> > since been remedied. Also, a gentle reminder to please tag SVN (as
> > previous Jelly releases have done).
> Of course tagging was planned. Do you mean I should tag RC1 as well ?
> > Since I've not participated in the discussion so far, and wasn't
> > around to bring this up earlier for the last three days when the plan
> > (below) was posted, I will vote 0. I will also encourage you to leave
> > votes open for atleast 72 hours (instead of 36).
> The fact that I sent this wish already long ago, with less clarity
> indeed, pushes me here. And also, the fact that maven plugin release is
> waiting.
>
> paul
>
> > Thank you for your time towards this release.
> > -Rahul
> >
> >
> >> thank you in advance.
> >>
> >> paul
> >>
> >> Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> >> > Here's the plan:
> >> > - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared
> >> > - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no risk
> >> > of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed).
> >> > - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only produce
> >> > jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the repo
> >> > at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made.
> >> > - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and
> >> > project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit a jar
> >> > upload to iblio's repo.
> >> >
> >> > I have assembled the following release candidates...
> >> > - a site with RC1 version tag:
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/
> >> > - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject:
> >> >
> >> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
--
http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/
Chuck Norris sleeps with a night light. Not because Chuck Norris is
afraid of the dark, but because the dark is afraid of Chuck Norris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [vote] Release commons-jelly-tags-interaction 1.1
Posted by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org>.
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> Regardless of what Jelly has been doing in the past, IMO its a good
> idea to have source distributions for any release, given which one
> would be able to (atleast after meeting certain pre-requisites)
> effectively reproduce the release binaries. Why don't Jelly taglibs
> have accompanying source distros?
As a general wish, I only agree.
In this case both limit in time and the fact that this tag-library is
exactly made of one class tend me to not do so.
> Note we had a similar situation in Jakarta Taglibs which AFAICT has
> since been remedied. Also, a gentle reminder to please tag SVN (as
> previous Jelly releases have done).
Of course tagging was planned. Do you mean I should tag RC1 as well ?
> Since I've not participated in the discussion so far, and wasn't
> around to bring this up earlier for the last three days when the plan
> (below) was posted, I will vote 0. I will also encourage you to leave
> votes open for atleast 72 hours (instead of 36).
The fact that I sent this wish already long ago, with less clarity
indeed, pushes me here. And also, the fact that maven plugin release is
waiting.
paul
> Thank you for your time towards this release.
> -Rahul
>
>
>> thank you in advance.
>>
>> paul
>>
>> Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>> > Here's the plan:
>> > - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared
>> > - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no risk
>> > of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed).
>> > - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only produce
>> > jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the repo
>> > at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made.
>> > - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and
>> > project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit a jar
>> > upload to iblio's repo.
>> >
>> > I have assembled the following release candidates...
>> > - a site with RC1 version tag:
>> > http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/
>> > - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject:
>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar
>>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [vote] Release commons-jelly-tags-interaction 1.1
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On 6/19/06, Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org> wrote:
> I hereby request to vote about the release of the jelly subproject
> "interaction tag library".
> The details of the release plan are below.
> I would like to please request a vote for 36 hours, ie. till Wednesday
> 14:00 GMT.
> +1 [ ] yes, let's do it
> 0 [X] let it happen... but I can't really check
> -1 [ ] don't do it because...
>
<snip/>
Regardless of what Jelly has been doing in the past, IMO its a good
idea to have source distributions for any release, given which one
would be able to (atleast after meeting certain pre-requisites)
effectively reproduce the release binaries. Why don't Jelly taglibs
have accompanying source distros?
Note we had a similar situation in Jakarta Taglibs which AFAICT has
since been remedied. Also, a gentle reminder to please tag SVN (as
previous Jelly releases have done).
Since I've not participated in the discussion so far, and wasn't
around to bring this up earlier for the last three days when the plan
(below) was posted, I will vote 0. I will also encourage you to leave
votes open for atleast 72 hours (instead of 36).
Thank you for your time towards this release.
-Rahul
> thank you in advance.
>
> paul
>
> Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> > Here's the plan:
> > - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared
> > - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no risk
> > of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed).
> > - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only produce
> > jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the repo
> > at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made.
> > - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and
> > project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit a jar
> > upload to iblio's repo.
> >
> > I have assembled the following release candidates...
> > - a site with RC1 version tag:
> > http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/
> > - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject:
> > http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar
> >
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [vote] Release commons-jelly-tags-interaction 1.1
Posted by Lukas Theussl <lt...@apache.org>.
+1
If anybody wants to try it with the new maven console plugin (which will
be released if this vote passes):
http://people.apache.org/~ltheussl/maven-console-plugin-1.2-SNAPSHOT.jar
http://people.apache.org/~ltheussl/maven-stage-site/maven-1.x/plugins/console/
Cheers,
-Lukas
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> I hereby request to vote about the release of the jelly subproject
> "interaction tag library".
> The details of the release plan are below.
> I would like to please request a vote for 36 hours, ie. till Wednesday
> 14:00 GMT.
> +1 [ ] yes, let's do it
> 0 [ ] let it happen... but I can't really check
> -1 [ ] don't do it because...
>
> thank you in advance.
>
> paul
>
> Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>
>> Here's the plan:
>> - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared
>> - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no risk
>> of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed).
>> - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only produce
>> jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the repo
>> at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made.
>> - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and
>> project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit a jar
>> upload to iblio's repo.
>>
>> I have assembled the following release candidates...
>> - a site with RC1 version tag:
>> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/
>> - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject:
>> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [vote] Release commons-jelly-tags-interaction 1.1
Posted by Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org>.
The vote result is as follows:
+1 Paul
+0 Rahul
+1 Dion
+1 Stephen
Result: +1
I tried to follow the procedure in order to see the impact of a binary
and source releases and have to say that I feat it'll move lots of
stuffs around. In particular, how would the mirrorred download look like
with several flavours of dists (both binary and sources) ? I have given
it up for now. I find it ok to have a single binary and source
distribution of the whole jelly project (yes, I know, it should be
released more often!).
We may consider the maven sources plugin at some point...
I am now setting things up for a proper signing and hashing then will
achieve the jar-oriented tasks of the release guide. And send an
announcement here and on commons-users.
paul
Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> I hereby request to vote about the release of the jelly subproject
> "interaction tag library".
> The details of the release plan are below.
> I would like to please request a vote for 36 hours, ie. till Wednesday
> 14:00 GMT.
> +1 [ ] yes, let's do it
> 0 [ ] let it happen... but I can't really check
> -1 [ ] don't do it because...
>
> thank you in advance.
>
> paul
>
> Paul Libbrecht wrote:
>> Here's the plan:
>> - all issues with this tag-libs are cleared
>> - no further changes are needed for the release... and almost no risk
>> of concurrent change exist (hence no branch is needed).
>> - the release shall, as with most jelly-tag-libraries, only produce
>> jar files to be consumed from the maven repo at ibiblio and the repo
>> at apache. No source or binary distribution will be made.
>> - once the vote passed, I will simply update changes.xml and
>> project.xml, tag the files, upload the jar to the Apache, submit a
>> jar upload to iblio's repo.
>>
>> I have assembled the following release candidates...
>> - a site with RC1 version tag:
>> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/jelly-tags-interaction-rc1/
>> - a jar which is the sole outcome of this subproject:
>> http://people.apache.org/~polx/tmp/commons-jelly-tags-interaction-1.1-RC1.jar
>>
>