You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by __matthewHawthorne <mh...@alumni.pitt.edu> on 2003/07/22 18:07:34 UTC
[io] some minor enhancements and completed action items
I submitted patches for some small changes, everything is in bugzilla:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21801
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [io] some minor enhancements and completed action items
Posted by Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>.
A technique I have used is to deprecate the classes with a clear 'WILL BE
DELETED' message. Then delete them a couple of weeks later.
Stephen
----- Original Message -----
From: "__matthewHawthorne" <mh...@alumni.pitt.edu>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <co...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: [io] some minor enhancements and completed action items
> Maybe we can create the newly named classes, but leave the old ones and
> deprecate them?
>
> This may be good for the short term, but we will have to think of a
> strategy for removing them, since it wouldn't make sense to have a 1.0
> release with deprecated classes.
>
>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> >Yup, seen them. Will look at them on Thursday or Friday if nobody acts
> >sooner. But the rename will likely provoke some Gump failures. Do we
> >need to inform the dependant projects prior to the renaming or shall we
> >just make it happen and let the others sort it out (IO is not released)?
> >
> >On 22.07.2003 18:07:34 __matthewHawthorne wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I submitted patches for some small changes, everything is in bugzilla:
> >>
> >>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21801
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >Jeremias Maerki
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [io] some minor enhancements and completed action items
Posted by __matthewHawthorne <mh...@alumni.pitt.edu>.
Maybe we can create the newly named classes, but leave the old ones and
deprecate them?
This may be good for the short term, but we will have to think of a
strategy for removing them, since it wouldn't make sense to have a 1.0
release with deprecated classes.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>Yup, seen them. Will look at them on Thursday or Friday if nobody acts
>sooner. But the rename will likely provoke some Gump failures. Do we
>need to inform the dependant projects prior to the renaming or shall we
>just make it happen and let the others sort it out (IO is not released)?
>
>On 22.07.2003 18:07:34 __matthewHawthorne wrote:
>
>
>>I submitted patches for some small changes, everything is in bugzilla:
>>
>>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21801
>>
>>
>
>
>Jeremias Maerki
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [io] some minor enhancements and completed action items
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch>.
Yup, seen them. Will look at them on Thursday or Friday if nobody acts
sooner. But the rename will likely provoke some Gump failures. Do we
need to inform the dependant projects prior to the renaming or shall we
just make it happen and let the others sort it out (IO is not released)?
On 22.07.2003 18:07:34 __matthewHawthorne wrote:
> I submitted patches for some small changes, everything is in bugzilla:
>
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21801
Jeremias Maerki
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org