You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@netbeans.apache.org by Matthias Bläsing <mb...@doppel-helix.eu> on 2018/02/01 17:57:44 UTC
Re: Ready to vote on Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta RC3?
Hi Geertjan,
in general I think we indeed made good strides. Jan has another set of
PRs prepared, though I think PR #399 is not strictly needed right now.
That PR is from my POV relevant when we package individual modules
(update center and maven). PR #401 looks more relevant, as it covers
embedded licenses.
I think we should go for another release, to see if we "really" made
progress and see what the fallout will be.
Mfg
Matthias
Am Mittwoch, den 31.01.2018, 21:34 +0100 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga:
> OK, these are now merged.
>
> Any objections from anyone to putting the rc3 release and vote thread
> together?
>
> We’ve really made a lot of progress, very impressive.
>
> Gj
>
> On Tuesday, January 30, 2018, Matthias Bläsing <mblaesing@doppel-
> helix.eu>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Geertjan,
> >
> > I think that it would be good to also get Jan's PR merged:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/388
> >
> > @Jan could you merge the PR? If you are tight on time, please
> > indicate
> > so, than I'll merge and resolve the minimal conflict.
> >
> > I wouldn't mind if 389 would also get merged :-) (this is just
> > selfishly for me and not necessary for a new RC).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
Re: Ready to vote on Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Beta RC3?
Posted by Geertjan Wielenga <ge...@googlemail.com>.
OK.
Getting my keys and other settings together and will then produce the
release, with the vote thread aiming to start on Monday.
Gj
On Thursday, February 1, 2018, Matthias Bläsing <mb...@doppel-helix.eu>
wrote:
> Hi Geertjan,
>
> in general I think we indeed made good strides. Jan has another set of
> PRs prepared, though I think PR #399 is not strictly needed right now.
> That PR is from my POV relevant when we package individual modules
> (update center and maven). PR #401 looks more relevant, as it covers
> embedded licenses.
>
> I think we should go for another release, to see if we "really" made
> progress and see what the fallout will be.
>
> Mfg
>
> Matthias
>
>
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 31.01.2018, 21:34 +0100 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga:
> > OK, these are now merged.
> >
> > Any objections from anyone to putting the rc3 release and vote thread
> > together?
> >
> > We’ve really made a lot of progress, very impressive.
> >
> > Gj
> >
> > On Tuesday, January 30, 2018, Matthias Bläsing <mblaesing@doppel-
> > helix.eu>
>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Geertjan,
> > >
> > > I think that it would be good to also get Jan's PR merged:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/388
> > >
> > > @Jan could you merge the PR? If you are tight on time, please
> > > indicate
> > > so, than I'll merge and resolve the minimal conflict.
> > >
> > > I wouldn't mind if 389 would also get merged :-) (this is just
> > > selfishly for me and not necessary for a new RC).
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
>
> For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists
>
>
>
>
Module license info for RCP, was Re: Ready to vote on Apache NetBeans
(incubating) 9.0 Beta RC3?
Posted by Neil C Smith <ne...@apache.org>.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 at 17:57 Matthias Bläsing <mb...@doppel-helix.eu>
wrote:
> in general I think we indeed made good strides. Jan has another set of
> PRs prepared, though I think PR #399 is not strictly needed right now.
> That PR is from my POV relevant when we package individual modules
> (update center and maven). PR #401 looks more relevant, as it covers
> embedded licenses.
>
Just because it's coming up with something I'm working on, and related to
your (Matthias) comment on #399, it would be useful to have the license
info (possibly including something like licenseinfo.xml?) in META-INF of
sources and binaries. Mainly thinking about making it easy for RCP
developers to hook into the same facilities for generating licensing files
in future. Being able to access license info / origin info in the UI for
suite libraries, etc. would also be useful.
Best wishes,
Neil
--
Neil C Smith
Artist & Technologist
www.neilcsmith.net
Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org