You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@atlas.apache.org by Madhan Neethiraj <ma...@apache.org> on 2018/04/23 23:45:41 UTC
Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
Atlas dev,
Please review the following component versions used by upcoming Apache Atlas 1.0 release:
- Hadoop: 2.7.1
- JanusGraph: 0.2.0
- TinkerPop: 3.2.6
- HBase: 1.1.2
- Solr: 5.5.1
- Kafka: 1.0.0
- Jackson: 2.9.2
- Spring: 4.3.8
- Hive: 1.2.1
- Sqoop: 1.4.6
- Storm: 1.2.0
Based on earlier discussions, support for Hadoop 3 will be taken up in a subsequent release, perhaps 3.1.
Regards,
Madhan
Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
Posted by Nigel Jones <ni...@gmail.com>.
On 2018/04/26 13:04:15, Graham Wallis <gr...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> So I would recommend trying 4.3.16 and 1.5.12.
I concur based on prereqs from the maven repo.
I do think it's worth considering moving to 5x/2x *AFTER* the 1.0 release. We would gain full java 8 spring support, compatability with java 9+ & some more reactive UI capabilities. More generally we should probably review other dependencies too though on a case by case basis
Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
Posted by Graham Wallis <gr...@uk.ibm.com>.
Hi Madhan
Currently we have Spring 4.3.8 and SpringBoot 1.5.7, but should update to
at least 4.3.11 and 1.5.7 as these are documented as compatible versions.
Probably better than that (but as yet untried in Atlas) would be 4.3.16
and 1.5.12 - also documented as compatible.
Spring has gone to v5 recently (Sep '17) and SpringBoot to v2 (Mar '18) -
but I would suggest that we may not want to venture across a version
boundary this close to the Atlas 1.0.0 release.
So I would recommend trying 4.3.16 and 1.5.12.
If anyone has any other information or opinions then please get involved
:-)
Best regards,
Graham
Graham Wallis
IBM Analytics
Internet: graham_wallis@uk.ibm.com
IBM Laboratories, Hursley Park, Hursley, Hampshire SO21 2JN
Tel: +44 7741 379735
From: Madhan Neethiraj <ma...@apache.org>
To: "dev@atlas.apache.org" <de...@atlas.apache.org>
Date: 25/04/2018 16:18
Subject: Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
Mandy,
What is the Spring version to target?
Thanks,
Madhan
On 4/25/18, 1:36 AM, "Mandy Chessell" <ma...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
Dear all,
I think we should move to the latest level of the spring
framework/boot
All the best
Mandy
___________________________________________
Mandy Chessell CBE FREng CEng FBCS
IBM Distinguished Engineer
Master Inventor
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Visiting Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of
Sheffield
Email: mandy_chessell@uk.ibm.com
LinkedIn:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.linkedin.com_pub_mandy-2Dchessell_22_897_a49&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Li6zJa6pLsu8dGS1GSW1j00glumVmLp0H5HVkn5QyAA&m=cphlXXIJynuE1fFJBdNBQBBW5yzK__jyCKxX2gweoZA&s=JyJR7lTN773ul90sNcw3AaSMuQmPCsc50WSOH_63428&e=
Assistant: Janet Brooks - jsbrooks12@uk.ibm.com
From: Nigel Jones <ni...@gmail.com>
To: <de...@atlas.apache.org>
Date: 24/04/2018 17:01
Subject: Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
On 2018/04/24 13:04:59, Graham Wallis <gr...@uk.ibm.com>
wrote:
> Do we need to include anything about development versions including
Maven,
> Java, etc?
I think it would be worth mentioning in readme/ wiki build, though now
we
have the maven-enforcer in place we know the min prereq java is java 8
update 151 & maven 3.5.0 which aren't far off (latest 172 - jdk
11/18.10
is next lts and could be 'interesting', and maven 3.5.3)
Post-release I think there's a few other questions about specific
component versions (and pom standardization where it makes sense), but
I
wouldn't change anything close to release
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
Posted by Madhan Neethiraj <ma...@apache.org>.
Mandy,
What is the Spring version to target?
Thanks,
Madhan
On 4/25/18, 1:36 AM, "Mandy Chessell" <ma...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
Dear all,
I think we should move to the latest level of the spring framework/boot
All the best
Mandy
___________________________________________
Mandy Chessell CBE FREng CEng FBCS
IBM Distinguished Engineer
Master Inventor
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Visiting Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of
Sheffield
Email: mandy_chessell@uk.ibm.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mandy-chessell/22/897/a49
Assistant: Janet Brooks - jsbrooks12@uk.ibm.com
From: Nigel Jones <ni...@gmail.com>
To: <de...@atlas.apache.org>
Date: 24/04/2018 17:01
Subject: Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
On 2018/04/24 13:04:59, Graham Wallis <gr...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> Do we need to include anything about development versions including
Maven,
> Java, etc?
I think it would be worth mentioning in readme/ wiki build, though now we
have the maven-enforcer in place we know the min prereq java is java 8
update 151 & maven 3.5.0 which aren't far off (latest 172 - jdk 11/18.10
is next lts and could be 'interesting', and maven 3.5.3)
Post-release I think there's a few other questions about specific
component versions (and pom standardization where it makes sense), but I
wouldn't change anything close to release
Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
Posted by Mandy Chessell <ma...@uk.ibm.com>.
Dear all,
I think we should move to the latest level of the spring framework/boot
All the best
Mandy
___________________________________________
Mandy Chessell CBE FREng CEng FBCS
IBM Distinguished Engineer
Master Inventor
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Visiting Professor, Department of Computer Science, University of
Sheffield
Email: mandy_chessell@uk.ibm.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/mandy-chessell/22/897/a49
Assistant: Janet Brooks - jsbrooks12@uk.ibm.com
From: Nigel Jones <ni...@gmail.com>
To: <de...@atlas.apache.org>
Date: 24/04/2018 17:01
Subject: Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
On 2018/04/24 13:04:59, Graham Wallis <gr...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> Do we need to include anything about development versions including
Maven,
> Java, etc?
I think it would be worth mentioning in readme/ wiki build, though now we
have the maven-enforcer in place we know the min prereq java is java 8
update 151 & maven 3.5.0 which aren't far off (latest 172 - jdk 11/18.10
is next lts and could be 'interesting', and maven 3.5.3)
Post-release I think there's a few other questions about specific
component versions (and pom standardization where it makes sense), but I
wouldn't change anything close to release
Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
Posted by Nigel Jones <ni...@gmail.com>.
On 2018/04/24 13:04:59, Graham Wallis <gr...@uk.ibm.com> wrote:
> Do we need to include anything about development versions including Maven,
> Java, etc?
I think it would be worth mentioning in readme/ wiki build, though now we have the maven-enforcer in place we know the min prereq java is java 8 update 151 & maven 3.5.0 which aren't far off (latest 172 - jdk 11/18.10 is next lts and could be 'interesting', and maven 3.5.3)
Post-release I think there's a few other questions about specific component versions (and pom standardization where it makes sense), but I wouldn't change anything close to release
Re: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
Posted by Graham Wallis <gr...@uk.ibm.com>.
Hi Madhan
Do we need to include anything about development versions including Maven,
Java, etc?
Best regards,
Graham
Graham Wallis
IBM Analytics
Internet: graham_wallis@uk.ibm.com
IBM Laboratories, Hursley Park, Hursley, Hampshire SO21 2JN
Tel: +44 7741 379735
From: Madhan Neethiraj <ma...@apache.org>
To: "dev@atlas.apache.org" <de...@atlas.apache.org>
Date: 24/04/2018 00:45
Subject: Dependent component versions for 1.0 release
Atlas dev,
Please review the following component versions used by upcoming Apache
Atlas 1.0 release:
- Hadoop: 2.7.1
- JanusGraph: 0.2.0
- TinkerPop: 3.2.6
- HBase: 1.1.2
- Solr: 5.5.1
- Kafka: 1.0.0
- Jackson: 2.9.2
- Spring: 4.3.8
- Hive: 1.2.1
- Sqoop: 1.4.6
- Storm: 1.2.0
Based on earlier discussions, support for Hadoop 3 will be taken up in a
subsequent release, perhaps 3.1.
Regards,
Madhan
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU