You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/07/29 07:07:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (LEGAL-394) Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 2.1 Japan (CC BY-SA 2.1 JP) in Apache project
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16561037#comment-16561037 ]
Henri Yandell edited comment on LEGAL-394 at 7/29/18 7:06 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you Junichi.
If I understand correctly, the NekoBean mascot is not a part of the NetBeans project. Rather it is the property of Kazuko-san.
On the page you say that NekoBean is "a mascot of the Apache NetBeans Community". Is it used for all NetBeans communities, or does it remain only used by the Japanese community?
Asking in a different way: If someone did something with the mascot that was considered 'wrong', for example drawing a new image that insults the NetBeans community, would you expect the Apache NetBeans project to be the one leading the complaint or would you expect the local Japanese community to lead the way?
My suspicion is that Apache NetBeans should be treating the NekoBean mascot as a trademark of the project (if i understand correctly, both logos and mascots are trademarks). I'll let you respond to the above and then I'll ask others for their thoughts.
was (Author: bayard):
Thank you Junichi.
If I understand correctly, the NekoBean mascot is not a part of the NetBeans project. Rather it is the property of Kazuko-san.
On the page you say that NekoBean is "a mascot of the Apache NetBeans Community". Is it used for all NetBeans communities, or does it remain only used by the Japanese community?
Asking in a different way: If someone did something with the mascot that was considered 'wrong', for example drawing a new image that insults the NetBeans community, would you expect the Apache NetBeans project to be the one leading the complaint or would you expect the local Japanese community to lead the way?
My suspicion is that Apache NetBeans should be treating the NekoBean mascot as a trademark of the project (if i understand correctly, both logos and mascots are trademarks). I'll let you respond to the above and then ask others for their thoughts.
> Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.1 Japan (CC BY-SA 2.1 JP) in Apache project
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-394
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-394
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Junichi Yamamoto
> Priority: Major
>
> Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.1 Japan(CC BY-SA 2.1 JP) doesn't exist in [1].
> Can Apache projects include Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.1 Japan(CC BY-SA 2.1 JP) [2]works?
> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#cc-sa
> [2] https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.1/jp/deed.en
> Thanks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org