You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> on 2024/02/19 09:34:37 UTC
[VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 19, 2024
Hey all,
I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
calling a vote on the release,
which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end on February
20, 2024 09:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. Vote
duration is according to a shortened voting period policy as accepted in
this thread
<https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv194w1fqqykrhswhmm54zy9gnnv6kgm>.
Consider this my (binding) +1.
Airflow Providers are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
*apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the provider
packages.
*apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
Python "wheel" release.
The test procedure for PMC members is described in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
described in:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
Public keys are available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
the artifact checksums when we actually release.
The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37534
The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
candidates.
Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation
after the
RC candidates are released.
You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc3/
Cheers,
Elad Kalif
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 19, 2024
Posted by Andrey Anshin <an...@taragol.is>.
+1 (binding)
Verify signatures, checksums, files
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 at 15:53, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding). Tested signatures, licences, checksums, reproducibility. All
> looks good.
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 1:51 PM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > > On Feb 19, 2024, at 6:59 PM, Phani Kumar <phani.kumar@astronomer.io
> .INVALID>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 non-binding.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:15 PM Pankaj Singh <ags.pankaj1996@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>
> > >> Tested my changes. looking good. Thanks for the RC's and testing it.
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:01 PM Pankaj Koti
> > >> <pa...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 (non-binding)
> > >>>
> > >>> Tested my latest PR in RC3 fixing task to be failed when pod times
> out
> > >>> to start https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37514 and works as
> > >>> expected.
> > >>> Tested other scenarios like successful run of KPO and works as
> > expected.
> > >>> Also have tested the dependent GKEStartPodOperator successful and
> > failure
> > >>> scenario where tasks should be marked as success/failed
> correspondingly
> > >>> and should not be stuck, works as expected.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> *Pankaj Koti*
> > >>> Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
> > >>> Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
> > >>> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
> > >>> Phone: +91 9730079985
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:05 PM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hey all,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email
> is
> > >>>> calling a vote on the release,
> > >>>> which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end on
> > >> February
> > >>>> 20, 2024 09:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been
> received.
> > >>> Vote
> > >>>> duration is according to a shortened voting period policy as
> accepted
> > >> in
> > >>>> this thread
> > >>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv194w1fqqykrhswhmm54zy9gnnv6kgm>.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Airflow Providers are available at:
> > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > >>>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > >>> provider
> > >>>> packages.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > >>>> Python "wheel" release.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
> RC
> > >> is
> > >>>> described in:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Public keys are available at:
> > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please vote accordingly:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [ ] +1 approve
> > >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> community
> > >> are
> > >>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > >>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > >>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > >>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37534
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in
> the
> > >> RC
> > >>>> candidates.
> > >>>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > >>> documentation
> > >>>> after the
> > >>>> RC candidates are released.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc3/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >>>> Elad Kalif
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 19, 2024
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
+1 (binding). Tested signatures, licences, checksums, reproducibility. All
looks good.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 1:51 PM Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Feb 19, 2024, at 6:59 PM, Phani Kumar <ph...@astronomer.io.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 non-binding.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:15 PM Pankaj Singh <ag...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> Tested my changes. looking good. Thanks for the RC's and testing it.
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:01 PM Pankaj Koti
> >> <pa...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>
> >>> Tested my latest PR in RC3 fixing task to be failed when pod times out
> >>> to start https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37514 and works as
> >>> expected.
> >>> Tested other scenarios like successful run of KPO and works as
> expected.
> >>> Also have tested the dependent GKEStartPodOperator successful and
> failure
> >>> scenario where tasks should be marked as success/failed correspondingly
> >>> and should not be stuck, works as expected.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>> *Pankaj Koti*
> >>> Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
> >>> Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
> >>> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
> >>> Phone: +91 9730079985
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:05 PM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hey all,
> >>>>
> >>>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> >>>> calling a vote on the release,
> >>>> which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end on
> >> February
> >>>> 20, 2024 09:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
> >>> Vote
> >>>> duration is according to a shortened voting period policy as accepted
> >> in
> >>>> this thread
> >>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv194w1fqqykrhswhmm54zy9gnnv6kgm>.
> >>>>
> >>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >>>>
> >>>> Airflow Providers are available at:
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> >>>>
> >>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> >>>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> >>> provider
> >>>> packages.
> >>>>
> >>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> >>>> Python "wheel" release.
> >>>>
> >>>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> >>>>
> >>>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC
> >> is
> >>>> described in:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Public keys are available at:
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> >>>>
> >>>> Please vote accordingly:
> >>>>
> >>>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >>>>
> >>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> >> are
> >>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >>>>
> >>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> >>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> >>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> >>>>
> >>>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37534
> >>>>
> >>>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the
> >> RC
> >>>> candidates.
> >>>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> >>> documentation
> >>>> after the
> >>>> RC candidates are released.
> >>>>
> >>>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc3/
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>> Elad Kalif
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 19, 2024
Posted by Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Wei
> On Feb 19, 2024, at 6:59 PM, Phani Kumar <ph...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
>
> +1 non-binding.
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:15 PM Pankaj Singh <ag...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> Tested my changes. looking good. Thanks for the RC's and testing it.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:01 PM Pankaj Koti
>> <pa...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> Tested my latest PR in RC3 fixing task to be failed when pod times out
>>> to start https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37514 and works as
>>> expected.
>>> Tested other scenarios like successful run of KPO and works as expected.
>>> Also have tested the dependent GKEStartPodOperator successful and failure
>>> scenario where tasks should be marked as success/failed correspondingly
>>> and should not be stuck, works as expected.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> *Pankaj Koti*
>>> Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
>>> Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
>>> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
>>> Phone: +91 9730079985
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:05 PM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey all,
>>>>
>>>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
>>>> calling a vote on the release,
>>>> which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end on
>> February
>>>> 20, 2024 09:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
>>> Vote
>>>> duration is according to a shortened voting period policy as accepted
>> in
>>>> this thread
>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv194w1fqqykrhswhmm54zy9gnnv6kgm>.
>>>>
>>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>>>>
>>>> Airflow Providers are available at:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>>>>
>>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
>>>> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
>>> provider
>>>> packages.
>>>>
>>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
>>>> Python "wheel" release.
>>>>
>>>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
>>>>
>>>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC
>> is
>>>> described in:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Public keys are available at:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>>>
>>>> Please vote accordingly:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 approve
>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>>>
>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
>> are
>>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>>>
>>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
>>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
>>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>>>
>>>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37534
>>>>
>>>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the
>> RC
>>>> candidates.
>>>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
>>> documentation
>>>> after the
>>>> RC candidates are released.
>>>>
>>>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc3/
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Elad Kalif
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 19, 2024
Posted by Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>.
+1 non binding
On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 4:29 PM, Phani Kumar
<ph...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> +1 non-binding.
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:15 PM Pankaj Singh <ag...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Tested my changes. looking good. Thanks for the RC's and testing it.
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:01 PM Pankaj Koti
> > <pa...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Tested my latest PR in RC3 fixing task to be failed when pod times out
> > > to start https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37514 and works as
> > > expected.
> > > Tested other scenarios like successful run of KPO and works as
> expected.
> > > Also have tested the dependent GKEStartPodOperator successful and
> failure
> > > scenario where tasks should be marked as success/failed correspondingly
> > > and should not be stuck, works as expected.
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > *Pankaj Koti*
> > > Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
> > > Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
> > > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
> > > Phone: +91 9730079985
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:05 PM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email
> is
> > > > calling a vote on the release,
> > > > which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end on
> > February
> > > > 20, 2024 09:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been
> received.
> > > Vote
> > > > duration is according to a shortened voting period policy as accepted
> > in
> > > > this thread
> > > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv194w1fqqykrhswhmm54zy9gnnv6kgm>.
> > > >
> > > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > >
> > > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > > >
> > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > > provider
> > > > packages.
> > > >
> > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > > Python "wheel" release.
> > > >
> > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > >
> > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
> RC
> > is
> > > > described in:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Public keys are available at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> > are
> > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > > >
> > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > > >
> > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37534
> > > >
> > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in
> the
> > RC
> > > > candidates.
> > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > > documentation
> > > > after the
> > > > RC candidates are released.
> > > >
> > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc3/
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Elad Kalif
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 19, 2024
Posted by Phani Kumar <ph...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 non-binding.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:15 PM Pankaj Singh <ag...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Tested my changes. looking good. Thanks for the RC's and testing it.
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:01 PM Pankaj Koti
> <pa...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Tested my latest PR in RC3 fixing task to be failed when pod times out
> > to start https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37514 and works as
> > expected.
> > Tested other scenarios like successful run of KPO and works as expected.
> > Also have tested the dependent GKEStartPodOperator successful and failure
> > scenario where tasks should be marked as success/failed correspondingly
> > and should not be stuck, works as expected.
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > *Pankaj Koti*
> > Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
> > Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
> > Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
> > Phone: +91 9730079985
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:05 PM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> > > calling a vote on the release,
> > > which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end on
> February
> > > 20, 2024 09:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
> > Vote
> > > duration is according to a shortened voting period policy as accepted
> in
> > > this thread
> > > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv194w1fqqykrhswhmm54zy9gnnv6kgm>.
> > >
> > > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > >
> > > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > >
> > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > provider
> > > packages.
> > >
> > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > > Python "wheel" release.
> > >
> > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > >
> > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC
> is
> > > described in:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > >
> > >
> > > Public keys are available at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> are
> > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > >
> > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > >
> > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37534
> > >
> > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the
> RC
> > > candidates.
> > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > documentation
> > > after the
> > > RC candidates are released.
> > >
> > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc3/
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Elad Kalif
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 19, 2024
Posted by Pankaj Singh <ag...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Tested my changes. looking good. Thanks for the RC's and testing it.
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 4:01 PM Pankaj Koti
<pa...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Tested my latest PR in RC3 fixing task to be failed when pod times out
> to start https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37514 and works as
> expected.
> Tested other scenarios like successful run of KPO and works as expected.
> Also have tested the dependent GKEStartPodOperator successful and failure
> scenario where tasks should be marked as success/failed correspondingly
> and should not be stuck, works as expected.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> *Pankaj Koti*
> Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
> Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
> Phone: +91 9730079985
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:05 PM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> > calling a vote on the release,
> > which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end on February
> > 20, 2024 09:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
> Vote
> > duration is according to a shortened voting period policy as accepted in
> > this thread
> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv194w1fqqykrhswhmm54zy9gnnv6kgm>.
> >
> > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >
> > Airflow Providers are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> >
> > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> provider
> > packages.
> >
> > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > Python "wheel" release.
> >
> > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> >
> > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
> > described in:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> >
> >
> > Public keys are available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
> > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >
> > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> >
> > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37534
> >
> > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
> > candidates.
> > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> documentation
> > after the
> > RC candidates are released.
> >
> > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc3/
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Elad Kalif
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers prepared on February 19, 2024
Posted by Pankaj Koti <pa...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 (non-binding)
Tested my latest PR in RC3 fixing task to be failed when pod times out
to start https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37514 and works as expected.
Tested other scenarios like successful run of KPO and works as expected.
Also have tested the dependent GKEStartPodOperator successful and failure
scenario where tasks should be marked as success/failed correspondingly
and should not be stuck, works as expected.
Best regards,
*Pankaj Koti*
Senior Software Engineer (Airflow OSS Engineering team)
Location: Pune, Maharashtra, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Phone: +91 9730079985
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 3:05 PM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release,
> which will last for *24 hours* - which means that it will end on February
> 20, 2024 09:35 AM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. Vote
> duration is according to a shortened voting period policy as accepted in
> this thread
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv194w1fqqykrhswhmm54zy9gnnv6kgm>.
>
> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>
> Airflow Providers are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>
> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the provider
> packages.
>
> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> Python "wheel" release.
>
> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
>
> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC is
> described in:
>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
>
>
> Public keys are available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>
> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>
> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37534
>
> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the RC
> candidates.
> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the documentation
> after the
> RC candidates are released.
>
> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/8.0.0rc3/
>
> Cheers,
> Elad Kalif
>