You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Iakov <ad...@jbpcapital.com> on 2007/02/26 20:28:35 UTC
Re: [Spam: 5.0] cant see named connection in jconsole
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/26/07, Iakov <ad...@jbpcapital.com> wrote:
>>
>> hi,
>>
>> i am running a client which concurrently uses two connections both are
>> named
>> (thru createConnection method) both are working, but i only see one of
>> them
>> as named in JConsole. how come?
>
> Are you sure you are refreshing the tree in JConsole? Does restarting
> JConsole help?
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
yep, I have other clients that connect and disconnect and i can see the tree
updating. I am using two different factories (the connecting threads are
completely separate) and create ConnectionFactory via new in c++ api. should
i keep one global factory ?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cant-see-named-connection-in-jconsole-tf3294255s2354.html#a9167116
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: cant see named connection in jconsole
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Great. Thanks for letting us know
On 2/27/07, Iakov <ad...@jbpcapital.com> wrote:
>
>
> James.Strachan wrote:
> >
> > On 2/26/07, Iakov <ad...@jbpcapital.com> wrote:
> >> James.Strachan wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On 2/26/07, Iakov <ad...@jbpcapital.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> i am running a client which concurrently uses two connections both are
> >> >> named
> >> >> (thru createConnection method) both are working, but i only see one of
> >> >> them
> >> >> as named in JConsole. how come?
> >> >
> >> > Are you sure you are refreshing the tree in JConsole? Does restarting
> >> > JConsole help?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > James
> >> > -------
> >> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> yep, I have other clients that connect and disconnect and i can see the
> >> tree
> >> updating. I am using two different factories (the connecting threads are
> >> completely separate) and create ConnectionFactory via new in c++ api.
> >> should
> >> i keep one global factory ?
> >
> > It shouldn't make much difference; a connection is a connection
> > however you make it.
> >
> > So could you summarize the exact circumstances when a connection does
> > not show up in JMX? Also are you completely sure that the connection
> > you think should be in JMX is definitely still active? (ActiveMQ by
> > default will shut down inactive connections).
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >
> >
>
> James, After making sure that every client _exits_ properly (i am running 4
> clients on the same channel) everything works. I think what was hapening was
> the following: one of the clients (not the one I was questioning) was not
> exiting gracefully - i was basically killing it every time i needed to
> restart, so the broker did not know the client was dead. after doing this
> kill/restart thingy for a while the _other_ client would not show a name on
> connection to the same channel even thought it was showing in the "address"
> category. it seems that when a publisher on a channel does not behave the
> listeners start acting funny. I am making sure now that every client
> observes the protocol so things are working.
>
> Thank you!
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/cant-see-named-connection-in-jconsole-tf3294255s2354.html#a9187987
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: [Spam: 5.0] cant see named connection in jconsole
Posted by Iakov <ad...@jbpcapital.com>.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 2/26/07, Iakov <ad...@jbpcapital.com> wrote:
>> James.Strachan wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2/26/07, Iakov <ad...@jbpcapital.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> hi,
>> >>
>> >> i am running a client which concurrently uses two connections both are
>> >> named
>> >> (thru createConnection method) both are working, but i only see one of
>> >> them
>> >> as named in JConsole. how come?
>> >
>> > Are you sure you are refreshing the tree in JConsole? Does restarting
>> > JConsole help?
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > James
>> > -------
>> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> yep, I have other clients that connect and disconnect and i can see the
>> tree
>> updating. I am using two different factories (the connecting threads are
>> completely separate) and create ConnectionFactory via new in c++ api.
>> should
>> i keep one global factory ?
>
> It shouldn't make much difference; a connection is a connection
> however you make it.
>
> So could you summarize the exact circumstances when a connection does
> not show up in JMX? Also are you completely sure that the connection
> you think should be in JMX is definitely still active? (ActiveMQ by
> default will shut down inactive connections).
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
James, After making sure that every client _exits_ properly (i am running 4
clients on the same channel) everything works. I think what was hapening was
the following: one of the clients (not the one I was questioning) was not
exiting gracefully - i was basically killing it every time i needed to
restart, so the broker did not know the client was dead. after doing this
kill/restart thingy for a while the _other_ client would not show a name on
connection to the same channel even thought it was showing in the "address"
category. it seems that when a publisher on a channel does not behave the
listeners start acting funny. I am making sure now that every client
observes the protocol so things are working.
Thank you!
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/cant-see-named-connection-in-jconsole-tf3294255s2354.html#a9187987
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: [Spam: 5.0] cant see named connection in jconsole
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 2/26/07, Iakov <ad...@jbpcapital.com> wrote:
> James.Strachan wrote:
> >
> > On 2/26/07, Iakov <ad...@jbpcapital.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> i am running a client which concurrently uses two connections both are
> >> named
> >> (thru createConnection method) both are working, but i only see one of
> >> them
> >> as named in JConsole. how come?
> >
> > Are you sure you are refreshing the tree in JConsole? Does restarting
> > JConsole help?
> >
> > --
> >
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >
> >
>
>
> yep, I have other clients that connect and disconnect and i can see the tree
> updating. I am using two different factories (the connecting threads are
> completely separate) and create ConnectionFactory via new in c++ api. should
> i keep one global factory ?
It shouldn't make much difference; a connection is a connection
however you make it.
So could you summarize the exact circumstances when a connection does
not show up in JMX? Also are you completely sure that the connection
you think should be in JMX is definitely still active? (ActiveMQ by
default will shut down inactive connections).
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/