You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com> on 2009/01/11 23:34:42 UTC
M1- Release Content
Hi;
We are planning to release the M1 version of the
OpenWebBeans . So far we have finished the some parts of the
specification and the nearly all of the build and release management tasks.
M1 release will support the following items;
* Simple WebBeans Support
* Producer Method Support
* Event and Observer Support
* Decorator and Interceptor Support
* Experimental XML Configuration Support
* Lookup and Dependency Injection Support
* Java EE Plugin Support (via ServetContextListener interface)
Remaining parts of the specification that we did not handle in this release are the following items;
* Enterprise WebBeans Support
* JMS WebBeans Support
* Producer Field Support
* Servlet Injection Support
* Inheritance and Realization Support
* Common Annotations Support
* Full Support for Validation Checks
* Passivation Scope and Serialization Operations
* Full Support for XML Configuration
* Java EE Container Integration Support (SPI)
? What do you think about the content of the M1 release ?
? Has it enough functionalities to create the release or we may delay it to another date for adding more functionality ?
? What is your further comments and advices?
Thanks;
/Gurkan
Re: M1- Release Content
Posted by Mohammad Nour El-Din <no...@gmail.com>.
Hi Gurkan...
I noticed that from the SCM mails :-). I will check the mails for
any other required items.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu
<gu...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Mohammad;
>
> I attacked the two of them in the late night :)
>
> 1* I added the *licences* directory for binary distribution of the project. You can reach all the distribution related stuffs under the */distribution* directory.
> 2* I changed the artifact names of the *webbeans-api* and *webbeans-impl* to *openwebbeans-api* and *openwebbeans-impl*
>
> Its great that you can start any other items.
>
> Thanks a lot;
>
> /Gurkan
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Mohammad Nour El-Din <no...@gmail.com>
> To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:12:13 PM
> Subject: Re: M1- Release Content
>
> Hi Gurkan...
>
> If you are not already started to work on these issues, I will start
> working on them tomorrow.
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi;
>>>
>>> We are planning to release the M1 version of the
>>> OpenWebBeans . So far we have finished the some parts of the
>>> specification and the nearly all of the build and release management
>>> tasks.
>>>
>>> M1 release will support the following items;
>>>
>>> * Simple WebBeans Support
>>> * Producer Method Support
>>> * Event and Observer Support
>>> * Decorator and Interceptor Support
>>> * Experimental XML Configuration Support
>>> * Lookup and Dependency Injection Support
>>> * Java EE Plugin Support (via ServetContextListener interface)
>>>
>>> Remaining parts of the specification that we did not handle in this
>>> release are the following items;
>>>
>>> * Enterprise WebBeans Support
>>> * JMS WebBeans Support
>>> * Producer Field Support
>>> * Servlet Injection Support
>>> * Inheritance and Realization Support
>>> * Common Annotations Support
>>> * Full Support for Validation Checks
>>> * Passivation Scope and Serialization Operations
>>> * Full Support for XML Configuration
>>> * Java EE Container Integration Support (SPI)
>>>
>>> ? What do you think about the content of the M1 release ?
>>> ? Has it enough functionalities to create the release or we may delay it
>>> to another date for adding more functionality ?
>>> ? What is your further comments and advices?
>>
>> IMO, that's enough for a M1 release.
>>
>> I built the current trunk code and took a quick review. Here are some
>> comments...
>>
>> * I think the LICENCE file needs to reference the licences directory. I'd
>> actually recommend that these be renamed LICENSE
>> * The NOTICE file does not conform to the requirements of the ASF. See --
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice (e.g. there's no
>> COPYRIGHT)
>> * Also, I doubt that the contents of the NOTICE file is correct. All it does
>> is provide attribution to embedded projects. However, some licenses (e.g.
>> ASL requires that NOTICES be reproduced).
>> * The binary distributions do not contain the licences directory. The
>> licenses must either be in the LICENSE file, or you must create a licenses
>> directory. I actually prefer a single license file, but licenses dirs are
>> used by some projects. As long as all licenses are available, I'm ok either
>> way.
>> * All OpenWebBeans jars/wars/etc. need to contain a META-INF/LICENSE and
>> META-INF/NOTICE files
>> * Hmmm. Seems like "webbeans-impl.jar" be "openwebbeans-impl.jar"
>>
>> Enough for tonight...
>>
>> --kevan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ----
> Thanks
> - Mohammad Nour
> - LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
> ----
> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
> - Albert Einstein
>
>
>
>
--
----
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
----
"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein
Re: M1- Release Content
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>.
Hi Mohammad;
I attacked the two of them in the late night :)
1* I added the *licences* directory for binary distribution of the project. You can reach all the distribution related stuffs under the */distribution* directory.
2* I changed the artifact names of the *webbeans-api* and *webbeans-impl* to *openwebbeans-api* and *openwebbeans-impl*
Its great that you can start any other items.
Thanks a lot;
/Gurkan
________________________________
From: Mohammad Nour El-Din <no...@gmail.com>
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 9:12:13 PM
Subject: Re: M1- Release Content
Hi Gurkan...
If you are not already started to work on these issues, I will start
working on them tomorrow.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 11, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>>
>> We are planning to release the M1 version of the
>> OpenWebBeans . So far we have finished the some parts of the
>> specification and the nearly all of the build and release management
>> tasks.
>>
>> M1 release will support the following items;
>>
>> * Simple WebBeans Support
>> * Producer Method Support
>> * Event and Observer Support
>> * Decorator and Interceptor Support
>> * Experimental XML Configuration Support
>> * Lookup and Dependency Injection Support
>> * Java EE Plugin Support (via ServetContextListener interface)
>>
>> Remaining parts of the specification that we did not handle in this
>> release are the following items;
>>
>> * Enterprise WebBeans Support
>> * JMS WebBeans Support
>> * Producer Field Support
>> * Servlet Injection Support
>> * Inheritance and Realization Support
>> * Common Annotations Support
>> * Full Support for Validation Checks
>> * Passivation Scope and Serialization Operations
>> * Full Support for XML Configuration
>> * Java EE Container Integration Support (SPI)
>>
>> ? What do you think about the content of the M1 release ?
>> ? Has it enough functionalities to create the release or we may delay it
>> to another date for adding more functionality ?
>> ? What is your further comments and advices?
>
> IMO, that's enough for a M1 release.
>
> I built the current trunk code and took a quick review. Here are some
> comments...
>
> * I think the LICENCE file needs to reference the licences directory. I'd
> actually recommend that these be renamed LICENSE
> * The NOTICE file does not conform to the requirements of the ASF. See --
> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice (e.g. there's no
> COPYRIGHT)
> * Also, I doubt that the contents of the NOTICE file is correct. All it does
> is provide attribution to embedded projects. However, some licenses (e.g.
> ASL requires that NOTICES be reproduced).
> * The binary distributions do not contain the licences directory. The
> licenses must either be in the LICENSE file, or you must create a licenses
> directory. I actually prefer a single license file, but licenses dirs are
> used by some projects. As long as all licenses are available, I'm ok either
> way.
> * All OpenWebBeans jars/wars/etc. need to contain a META-INF/LICENSE and
> META-INF/NOTICE files
> * Hmmm. Seems like "webbeans-impl.jar" be "openwebbeans-impl.jar"
>
> Enough for tonight...
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
>
--
----
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
----
"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein
Re: M1- Release Content
Posted by Mohammad Nour El-Din <no...@gmail.com>.
Hi Gurkan...
If you are not already started to work on these issues, I will start
working on them tomorrow.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 11, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>>
>> We are planning to release the M1 version of the
>> OpenWebBeans . So far we have finished the some parts of the
>> specification and the nearly all of the build and release management
>> tasks.
>>
>> M1 release will support the following items;
>>
>> * Simple WebBeans Support
>> * Producer Method Support
>> * Event and Observer Support
>> * Decorator and Interceptor Support
>> * Experimental XML Configuration Support
>> * Lookup and Dependency Injection Support
>> * Java EE Plugin Support (via ServetContextListener interface)
>>
>> Remaining parts of the specification that we did not handle in this
>> release are the following items;
>>
>> * Enterprise WebBeans Support
>> * JMS WebBeans Support
>> * Producer Field Support
>> * Servlet Injection Support
>> * Inheritance and Realization Support
>> * Common Annotations Support
>> * Full Support for Validation Checks
>> * Passivation Scope and Serialization Operations
>> * Full Support for XML Configuration
>> * Java EE Container Integration Support (SPI)
>>
>> ? What do you think about the content of the M1 release ?
>> ? Has it enough functionalities to create the release or we may delay it
>> to another date for adding more functionality ?
>> ? What is your further comments and advices?
>
> IMO, that's enough for a M1 release.
>
> I built the current trunk code and took a quick review. Here are some
> comments...
>
> * I think the LICENCE file needs to reference the licences directory. I'd
> actually recommend that these be renamed LICENSE
> * The NOTICE file does not conform to the requirements of the ASF. See --
> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice (e.g. there's no
> COPYRIGHT)
> * Also, I doubt that the contents of the NOTICE file is correct. All it does
> is provide attribution to embedded projects. However, some licenses (e.g.
> ASL requires that NOTICES be reproduced).
> * The binary distributions do not contain the licences directory. The
> licenses must either be in the LICENSE file, or you must create a licenses
> directory. I actually prefer a single license file, but licenses dirs are
> used by some projects. As long as all licenses are available, I'm ok either
> way.
> * All OpenWebBeans jars/wars/etc. need to contain a META-INF/LICENSE and
> META-INF/NOTICE files
> * Hmmm. Seems like "webbeans-impl.jar" be "openwebbeans-impl.jar"
>
> Enough for tonight...
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
>
--
----
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour
- LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/mnour
----
"Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
- Albert Einstein
Re: M1- Release Content
Posted by Gurkan Erdogdu <gu...@yahoo.com>.
Thanks Matthias, I will look at it.
/Gurkan
________________________________
From: Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>
To: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:22:53 PM
Subject: Re: M1- Release Content
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 11, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>>
>> We are planning to release the M1 version of the
>> OpenWebBeans . So far we have finished the some parts of the
>> specification and the nearly all of the build and release management
>> tasks.
>>
>> M1 release will support the following items;
>>
>> * Simple WebBeans Support
>> * Producer Method Support
>> * Event and Observer Support
>> * Decorator and Interceptor Support
>> * Experimental XML Configuration Support
>> * Lookup and Dependency Injection Support
>> * Java EE Plugin Support (via ServetContextListener interface)
>>
>> Remaining parts of the specification that we did not handle in this
>> release are the following items;
>>
>> * Enterprise WebBeans Support
>> * JMS WebBeans Support
>> * Producer Field Support
>> * Servlet Injection Support
>> * Inheritance and Realization Support
>> * Common Annotations Support
>> * Full Support for Validation Checks
>> * Passivation Scope and Serialization Operations
>> * Full Support for XML Configuration
>> * Java EE Container Integration Support (SPI)
>>
>> ? What do you think about the content of the M1 release ?
>> ? Has it enough functionalities to create the release or we may delay it
>> to another date for adding more functionality ?
>> ? What is your further comments and advices?
>
> IMO, that's enough for a M1 release.
>
> I built the current trunk code and took a quick review. Here are some
> comments...
>
> * I think the LICENCE file needs to reference the licences directory. I'd
> actually recommend that these be renamed LICENSE
> * The NOTICE file does not conform to the requirements of the ASF. See --
> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice (e.g. there's no
> COPYRIGHT)
> * Also, I doubt that the contents of the NOTICE file is correct. All it does
> is provide attribution to embedded projects. However, some licenses (e.g.
> ASL requires that NOTICES be reproduced).
> * The binary distributions do not contain the licences directory. The
> licenses must either be in the LICENSE file, or you must create a licenses
> directory. I actually prefer a single license file, but licenses dirs are
> used by some projects. As long as all licenses are available, I'm ok either
> way.
> * All OpenWebBeans jars/wars/etc. need to contain a META-INF/LICENSE and
> META-INF/NOTICE files
> * Hmmm. Seems like "webbeans-impl.jar" be "openwebbeans-impl.jar"
the RAT (m2 plugin) is usually helpful for these kinda things
(isn't it still in the incubator?)
>
> Enough for tonight...
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: M1- Release Content
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 11, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
>> Hi;
>>
>> We are planning to release the M1 version of the
>> OpenWebBeans . So far we have finished the some parts of the
>> specification and the nearly all of the build and release management
>> tasks.
>>
>> M1 release will support the following items;
>>
>> * Simple WebBeans Support
>> * Producer Method Support
>> * Event and Observer Support
>> * Decorator and Interceptor Support
>> * Experimental XML Configuration Support
>> * Lookup and Dependency Injection Support
>> * Java EE Plugin Support (via ServetContextListener interface)
>>
>> Remaining parts of the specification that we did not handle in this
>> release are the following items;
>>
>> * Enterprise WebBeans Support
>> * JMS WebBeans Support
>> * Producer Field Support
>> * Servlet Injection Support
>> * Inheritance and Realization Support
>> * Common Annotations Support
>> * Full Support for Validation Checks
>> * Passivation Scope and Serialization Operations
>> * Full Support for XML Configuration
>> * Java EE Container Integration Support (SPI)
>>
>> ? What do you think about the content of the M1 release ?
>> ? Has it enough functionalities to create the release or we may delay it
>> to another date for adding more functionality ?
>> ? What is your further comments and advices?
>
> IMO, that's enough for a M1 release.
>
> I built the current trunk code and took a quick review. Here are some
> comments...
>
> * I think the LICENCE file needs to reference the licences directory. I'd
> actually recommend that these be renamed LICENSE
> * The NOTICE file does not conform to the requirements of the ASF. See --
> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice (e.g. there's no
> COPYRIGHT)
> * Also, I doubt that the contents of the NOTICE file is correct. All it does
> is provide attribution to embedded projects. However, some licenses (e.g.
> ASL requires that NOTICES be reproduced).
> * The binary distributions do not contain the licences directory. The
> licenses must either be in the LICENSE file, or you must create a licenses
> directory. I actually prefer a single license file, but licenses dirs are
> used by some projects. As long as all licenses are available, I'm ok either
> way.
> * All OpenWebBeans jars/wars/etc. need to contain a META-INF/LICENSE and
> META-INF/NOTICE files
> * Hmmm. Seems like "webbeans-impl.jar" be "openwebbeans-impl.jar"
the RAT (m2 plugin) is usually helpful for these kinda things
(isn't it still in the incubator?)
>
> Enough for tonight...
>
> --kevan
>
>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: M1- Release Content
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Jan 11, 2009, at 5:34 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
> Hi;
>
> We are planning to release the M1 version of the
> OpenWebBeans . So far we have finished the some parts of the
> specification and the nearly all of the build and release management
> tasks.
>
> M1 release will support the following items;
>
> * Simple WebBeans Support
> * Producer Method Support
> * Event and Observer Support
> * Decorator and Interceptor Support
> * Experimental XML Configuration Support
> * Lookup and Dependency Injection Support
> * Java EE Plugin Support (via ServetContextListener interface)
>
> Remaining parts of the specification that we did not handle in this
> release are the following items;
>
> * Enterprise WebBeans Support
> * JMS WebBeans Support
> * Producer Field Support
> * Servlet Injection Support
> * Inheritance and Realization Support
> * Common Annotations Support
> * Full Support for Validation Checks
> * Passivation Scope and Serialization Operations
> * Full Support for XML Configuration
> * Java EE Container Integration Support (SPI)
>
> ? What do you think about the content of the M1 release ?
> ? Has it enough functionalities to create the release or we may
> delay it to another date for adding more functionality ?
> ? What is your further comments and advices?
IMO, that's enough for a M1 release.
I built the current trunk code and took a quick review. Here are some
comments...
* I think the LICENCE file needs to reference the licences directory.
I'd actually recommend that these be renamed LICENSE
* The NOTICE file does not conform to the requirements of the ASF. See
-- http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice (e.g. there's
no COPYRIGHT)
* Also, I doubt that the contents of the NOTICE file is correct. All
it does is provide attribution to embedded projects. However, some
licenses (e.g. ASL requires that NOTICES be reproduced).
* The binary distributions do not contain the licences directory. The
licenses must either be in the LICENSE file, or you must create a
licenses directory. I actually prefer a single license file, but
licenses dirs are used by some projects. As long as all licenses are
available, I'm ok either way.
* All OpenWebBeans jars/wars/etc. need to contain a META-INF/LICENSE
and META-INF/NOTICE files
* Hmmm. Seems like "webbeans-impl.jar" be "openwebbeans-impl.jar"
Enough for tonight...
--kevan