You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com> on 2006/08/06 07:00:53 UTC
Using TeamCity for continuous integration
If there are no objections, I'm going to look into TeamCity (probably
not right away but soon) for continuous integration. Details are at:
http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/.
The OpenJPA project is using TeamCity and Patrick Linksey gave it a
good review when I talked to him about their experiences with it.
Fortunately, we will likely be able to piggy-back off the machines
they are currently using (in a DMZ at BEA).
If anyone is interested in helping with this, please let me know.
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Using TeamCity for continuous integration
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Could you say what the issues you've found with Continuum? Maybe there's
already ways to fix them or we could work with the Continuum project to fix
them. One of the things we need to do to graduate from incubation is to
demonstrate we have a synergistic relationship with the ASF and subprojects.
I'm sure we'll get more points from using/helping Continuum than if we go
off and set up our own build infrastructure using a competing product.
...ant
On 8/7/06, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have Continuum up and running with some issues observed. With one of my
> friends' recommendation, I also tried luntbuild before I went on vacation.
> We can evaluate the three options and decide. I can provide a list of
> cons/pros for Continuum and Luntbuild.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Marino" <jm...@myromatours.com>
> To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 8:10 AM
> Subject: Re: Using TeamCity for continuous integration
>
>
> > It didn't seem apparent from the thread if this is in place or not.
> > Anyway, I think we should take a look at both, if possible, and
> pick the
> > one that best suits what we need to do. Also, we could have two or more
> > builds for testing things on different platforms. Let's see if Raymond
> is
> > looking into this further.
> >
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > On Aug 6, 2006, at 3:03 AM, ant elder wrote:
> >
> >> Wouldn't it be better to use Continuum if possible as thats an Apache
> >> project along with the Apache infrastructure instead of a BEA server?
> >> There's been several mentions of doing this on incubator-general
> >> recently,
> >> eg [2], so it sounds like it is possible to do now.
> >>
> >> Also, Raymond already started some work on setting up a
> Continuum build,
> >> [1], he's on holiday right now so could this wait till he's back and
> we
> >> hear
> >> where he has got to?
> >>
> >> ...ant
> >>
> >> [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=115074596300004&r=1&w=2
> >> [2]
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/
> >> %3c002001c6633c$befce470$71ed1a09@RFENGXP%3e
> >>
> >> On 8/6/06, Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If there are no objections, I'm going to look into TeamCity (probably
> >>> not right away but soon) for continuous integration. Details are at:
> >>> http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/ .
> >>>
> >>> The OpenJPA project is using TeamCity and Patrick Linksey gave it a
> >>> good review when I talked to him about their experiences with it.
> >>> Fortunately, we will likely be able to piggy-back off the machines
> >>> they are currently using (in a DMZ at BEA).
> >>>
> >>> If anyone is interested in helping with this, please let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Jim
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: Using TeamCity for continuous integration
Posted by Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com>.
On Aug 7, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have Continuum up and running with some issues observed. With one
> of my friends' recommendation, I also tried luntbuild before I went
> on vacation. We can evaluate the three options and decide. I can
> provide a list of cons/pros for Continuum and Luntbuild.
>
Thanks Raymond, could you do that?
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Using TeamCity for continuous integration
Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I have Continuum up and running with some issues observed. With one of my
friends' recommendation, I also tried luntbuild before I went on vacation.
We can evaluate the three options and decide. I can provide a list of
cons/pros for Continuum and Luntbuild.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Marino" <jm...@myromatours.com>
To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: Using TeamCity for continuous integration
> It didn't seem apparent from the thread if this is in place or not.
> Anyway, I think we should take a look at both, if possible, and pick the
> one that best suits what we need to do. Also, we could have two or more
> builds for testing things on different platforms. Let's see if Raymond is
> looking into this further.
>
>
> Jim
>
> On Aug 6, 2006, at 3:03 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be better to use Continuum if possible as thats an Apache
>> project along with the Apache infrastructure instead of a BEA server?
>> There's been several mentions of doing this on incubator-general
>> recently,
>> eg [2], so it sounds like it is possible to do now.
>>
>> Also, Raymond already started some work on setting up a Continuum build,
>> [1], he's on holiday right now so could this wait till he's back and we
>> hear
>> where he has got to?
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=115074596300004&r=1&w=2
>> [2]
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/
>> %3c002001c6633c$befce470$71ed1a09@RFENGXP%3e
>>
>> On 8/6/06, Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> If there are no objections, I'm going to look into TeamCity (probably
>>> not right away but soon) for continuous integration. Details are at:
>>> http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/ .
>>>
>>> The OpenJPA project is using TeamCity and Patrick Linksey gave it a
>>> good review when I talked to him about their experiences with it.
>>> Fortunately, we will likely be able to piggy-back off the machines
>>> they are currently using (in a DMZ at BEA).
>>>
>>> If anyone is interested in helping with this, please let me know.
>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Using TeamCity for continuous integration
Posted by Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com>.
It didn't seem apparent from the thread if this is in place or not.
Anyway, I think we should take a look at both, if possible, and pick
the one that best suits what we need to do. Also, we could have two
or more builds for testing things on different platforms. Let's see
if Raymond is looking into this further.
Jim
On Aug 6, 2006, at 3:03 AM, ant elder wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to use Continuum if possible as thats an Apache
> project along with the Apache infrastructure instead of a BEA server?
> There's been several mentions of doing this on incubator-general
> recently,
> eg [2], so it sounds like it is possible to do now.
>
> Also, Raymond already started some work on setting up a Continuum
> build,
> [1], he's on holiday right now so could this wait till he's back
> and we hear
> where he has got to?
>
> ...ant
>
> [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=115074596300004&r=1&w=2
> [2]
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/
> %3c002001c6633c$befce470$71ed1a09@RFENGXP%3e
>
> On 8/6/06, Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com> wrote:
>>
>> If there are no objections, I'm going to look into TeamCity (probably
>> not right away but soon) for continuous integration. Details are at:
>> http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/ .
>>
>> The OpenJPA project is using TeamCity and Patrick Linksey gave it a
>> good review when I talked to him about their experiences with it.
>> Fortunately, we will likely be able to piggy-back off the machines
>> they are currently using (in a DMZ at BEA).
>>
>> If anyone is interested in helping with this, please let me know.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Using TeamCity for continuous integration
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Wouldn't it be better to use Continuum if possible as thats an Apache
project along with the Apache infrastructure instead of a BEA server?
There's been several mentions of doing this on incubator-general recently,
eg [2], so it sounds like it is possible to do now.
Also, Raymond already started some work on setting up a Continuum build,
[1], he's on holiday right now so could this wait till he's back and we hear
where he has got to?
...ant
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=115074596300004&r=1&w=2
[2]
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200604.mbox/%3c002001c6633c$befce470$71ed1a09@RFENGXP%3e
On 8/6/06, Jim Marino <jm...@myromatours.com> wrote:
>
> If there are no objections, I'm going to look into TeamCity (probably
> not right away but soon) for continuous integration. Details are at:
> http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/ .
>
> The OpenJPA project is using TeamCity and Patrick Linksey gave it a
> good review when I talked to him about their experiences with it.
> Fortunately, we will likely be able to piggy-back off the machines
> they are currently using (in a DMZ at BEA).
>
> If anyone is interested in helping with this, please let me know.
>
> Jim
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>