You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Michael Rasmussen <ra...@hotmail.com> on 2004/06/02 16:16:45 UTC
RE: struts-faces target which v of struts
I am wondering if the reason that this post has not been answered is because
nobody really knows the answer. Is that the case? is there no "roadmap"
for struts faces? I can't seem to find one anywhere.
>From: "Michael Rasmussen" <ra...@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
>To: <de...@struts.apache.org>
>Subject: struts-faces target which v of struts
>Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 22:33:51 -0400
>
>Currently there are several places in struts-faces where faces relies on
>deprecated methods in struts. Obviously this is not good for the long term
>compatibility of struts faces. Which version of the struts framework is
>the
>next point release of faces supposed to target? I am wondering because
>this
>is directly related to the patch I submitted yesterday.
>
>http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29219
>
>Michael
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
_________________________________________________________________
Watch the online reality show Mixed Messages with a friend and enter to win
a trip to NY
http://www.msnmessenger-download.click-url.com/go/onm00200497ave/direct/01/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
RE: struts-faces target which v of struts
Posted by Joe Germuska <Jo...@Germuska.com>.
At 2:16 PM +0000 6/2/04, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>I am wondering if the reason that this post has not been answered is
>because nobody really knows the answer. Is that the case? is
>there no "roadmap" for struts faces? I can't seem to find one
>anywhere.
I think you assign too much formality to struts-faces. Craig is
super busy, and he is the one who has done all the work so far on
struts-faces.
I see no reason why struts-faces shouldn't track the development of
Struts. It should always build against CVS HEAD and the same
dependencies. Maybe at some point in the future we'd need a
"maintenance" branch of struts-faces, but I don't think enough people
use it yet for us to get hung up on that.
As with any part of Struts, interested developers are always
encouraged to dive in. Since I've never written a struts-faces app,
I haven't spent any time with that code.
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
Joe@Germuska.com
http://blog.germuska.com
"In fact, when I die, if I don't hear 'A Love Supreme,' I'll turn
back; I'll know I'm in the wrong place."
- Carlos Santana
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org