You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net> on 2001/11/12 18:14:05 UTC
Re: cvs commit: apr/file_io/win32 filestat.c dir.c
> wrowe 01/11/12 08:58:37
>
> Modified: include/arch/win32 fileio.h
> file_io/win32 filestat.c dir.c
> Log:
> This is a fix for the SymLink tests on Win2k, that is required by the
> recent fixes to request.c (probably required before that, as well.)
Since we still seem to be me-too'ing the 2_0_28 release, I've pushed this
(significant) bugfix into 2.0.28 ... 2.0 on Win32 was having problems without
this patch, now it will either have different problems or no problems :)
Bill
Re: cvs commit: apr/file_io/win32 filestat.c dir.c
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>.
From: "Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:53 AM
> Bill,
> With all due respect for your your contributions, unilaterally bumping the tag is not a
> cool thing to do w/o first checking with the "release manager" of the tag (that would be
> Greg Ames for 2.0.28). IMHO. But I do agree in concept with the bump.
Concur... Greg, sorry for stepping on toes, do you have any objections?
(should I move the tag back to their original versions?)
Bill
Re: cvs commit: apr/file_io/win32 filestat.c dir.c
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
Bill,
With all due respect for your your contributions, unilaterally bumping the tag is not a
cool thing to do w/o first checking with the "release manager" of the tag (that would be
Greg Ames for 2.0.28). IMHO. But I do agree in concept with the bump.
Bill
> > wrowe 01/11/12 08:58:37
> >
> > Modified: include/arch/win32 fileio.h
> > file_io/win32 filestat.c dir.c
> > Log:
> > This is a fix for the SymLink tests on Win2k, that is required by the
> > recent fixes to request.c (probably required before that, as well.)
>
> Since we still seem to be me-too'ing the 2_0_28 release, I've pushed this
> (significant) bugfix into 2.0.28 ... 2.0 on Win32 was having problems without
> this patch, now it will either have different problems or no problems :)
>
> Bill
>
Re: cvs commit: apr/file_io/win32 filestat.c dir.c
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>.
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:14 AM
> > wrowe 01/11/12 08:58:37
> >
> > Modified: include/arch/win32 fileio.h
> > file_io/win32 filestat.c dir.c
> > Log:
> > This is a fix for the SymLink tests on Win2k, that is required by the
> > recent fixes to request.c (probably required before that, as well.)
>
> Since we still seem to be me-too'ing the 2_0_28 release, I've pushed this
> (significant) bugfix into 2.0.28 ... 2.0 on Win32 was having problems without
> this patch, now it will either have different problems or no problems :)
I've also pushed the tag on this patch - since it's an obvious t&r fix with little
impact, other than fixing the t&r :)
--- build/httpd_roll_release 2001/11/08 15:38:38 1.5
+++ build/httpd_roll_release 2001/11/10 01:34:13 1.6
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
# Now update the FAQ in the tarball
rm -f docs/manual/faq/*.html
-cp /www/www.apache.org/docs-2.0/faq/*.html docs/manual/faq/
+cp /www/httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/faq/*.html docs/manual/faq/
# Create the configure scripts
echo "Creating the configure script"
simplify this tarball
Having looked at the diffs on 2.0.28, +1 on beta.
Bill
Re: cvs commit: apr/file_io/win32 filestat.c dir.c
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>.
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:14 AM
> > wrowe 01/11/12 08:58:37
> >
> > Modified: include/arch/win32 fileio.h
> > file_io/win32 filestat.c dir.c
> > Log:
> > This is a fix for the SymLink tests on Win2k, that is required by the
> > recent fixes to request.c (probably required before that, as well.)
>
> Since we still seem to be me-too'ing the 2_0_28 release, I've pushed this
> (significant) bugfix into 2.0.28 ... 2.0 on Win32 was having problems without
> this patch, now it will either have different problems or no problems :)
I've also pushed the tag on this patch - since it's an obvious t&r fix with little
impact, other than fixing the t&r :)
--- build/httpd_roll_release 2001/11/08 15:38:38 1.5
+++ build/httpd_roll_release 2001/11/10 01:34:13 1.6
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
# Now update the FAQ in the tarball
rm -f docs/manual/faq/*.html
-cp /www/www.apache.org/docs-2.0/faq/*.html docs/manual/faq/
+cp /www/httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/faq/*.html docs/manual/faq/
# Create the configure scripts
echo "Creating the configure script"
simplify this tarball
Having looked at the diffs on 2.0.28, +1 on beta.
Bill