You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@archiva.apache.org by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> on 2014/04/01 02:37:33 UTC

Cassandra storage and jdk version?

Hi Folks,

I finished the implementation of the metadata storage using Cassandra.
See docs here: http://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.0.2-SNAPSHOT/adminguide/repositories-content-storage.html
Builds available from here:
https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Archiva/job/archiva-all-maven-3.1.x-jdk-1.7/

The question is now the jdk version. With this cassandra runtime
version it's now 1.7.
So are we ok to set 1.7 as a prerequisite?


Cheers
-- 
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

Re: Cassandra storage and jdk version?

Posted by Chris Graham <ch...@gmail.com>.
Hmmm. Let me see if I can set up WAS 8.5/8.5.5 for JDK 7. By default it's
JDK 6.

-Chris


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Eric Barboni <Er...@irit.fr> wrote:

> No problem to move to jdk 7.
> Regards
> Eri
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Olivier Lamy [mailto:olamy@apache.org]
> Envoyé : mardi 1 avril 2014 03:05
> À : dev@archiva.apache.org
> Objet : Re: Cassandra storage and jdk version?
>
> On 1 April 2014 11:57, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 1 Apr 2014, at 11:37 am, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Folks,
> >>
> >> I finished the implementation of the metadata storage using Cassandra.
> >> See docs here:
> >> http://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.0.2-SNAPSHOT/adminguide/repositories
> >> -content-storage.html
> >> Builds available from here:
> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Archiva/job/archiva-all-maven
> >> -3.1.x-jdk-1.7/
> >
> > Will take a look!
> >
> > What is the impact on the app overall in terms of deployment,
> performance,
> memory, etc.?
>
> Less memory usage :-) as we do not run anymore internally the Jackrabbit
> stack.
> Deployment is just a matter of configuring 2 files. Having that dynamic
> need
> huge/complicated refactoring!
> I need to investigate a bit to improve a bit performance. (some stuff can
> be
> done with simply using cql queries) but that's not too bad :-)
>
> An idea I have in mind is to propose an alternate file storage in Cassandra
> to have a real scalable architecture (local storage could act as cache
> especially for released artifacts)
>
> >
> >>
> >> The question is now the jdk version. With this cassandra runtime
> >> version it's now 1.7.
> >> So are we ok to set 1.7 as a prerequisite?
> >
> > No problem here.
>
> I was just started a discussion here and will probably start a more
> official
> vote soon.
>
>
> >
> > - Brett
> >
> > --
> > Brett Porter   @brettporter
> > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>
>

RE: Cassandra storage and jdk version?

Posted by Eric Barboni <Er...@irit.fr>.
No problem to move to jdk 7. 
Regards
Eri

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Olivier Lamy [mailto:olamy@apache.org] 
Envoyé : mardi 1 avril 2014 03:05
À : dev@archiva.apache.org
Objet : Re: Cassandra storage and jdk version?

On 1 April 2014 11:57, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 1 Apr 2014, at 11:37 am, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I finished the implementation of the metadata storage using Cassandra.
>> See docs here: 
>> http://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.0.2-SNAPSHOT/adminguide/repositories
>> -content-storage.html
>> Builds available from here:
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Archiva/job/archiva-all-maven
>> -3.1.x-jdk-1.7/
>
> Will take a look!
>
> What is the impact on the app overall in terms of deployment, performance,
memory, etc.?

Less memory usage :-) as we do not run anymore internally the Jackrabbit
stack.
Deployment is just a matter of configuring 2 files. Having that dynamic need
huge/complicated refactoring!
I need to investigate a bit to improve a bit performance. (some stuff can be
done with simply using cql queries) but that's not too bad :-)

An idea I have in mind is to propose an alternate file storage in Cassandra
to have a real scalable architecture (local storage could act as cache
especially for released artifacts)

>
>>
>> The question is now the jdk version. With this cassandra runtime 
>> version it's now 1.7.
>> So are we ok to set 1.7 as a prerequisite?
>
> No problem here.

I was just started a discussion here and will probably start a more official
vote soon.


>
> - Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter   @brettporter
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
>



--
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy


Re: Cassandra storage and jdk version?

Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
On 1 April 2014 11:57, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 1 Apr 2014, at 11:37 am, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I finished the implementation of the metadata storage using Cassandra.
>> See docs here: http://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.0.2-SNAPSHOT/adminguide/repositories-content-storage.html
>> Builds available from here:
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Archiva/job/archiva-all-maven-3.1.x-jdk-1.7/
>
> Will take a look!
>
> What is the impact on the app overall in terms of deployment, performance, memory, etc.?

Less memory usage :-) as we do not run anymore internally the Jackrabbit stack.
Deployment is just a matter of configuring 2 files. Having that
dynamic need huge/complicated refactoring!
I need to investigate a bit to improve a bit performance. (some stuff
can be done with simply using cql queries) but that's not too bad :-)

An idea I have in mind is to propose an alternate file storage in
Cassandra to have a real scalable architecture (local storage could
act as cache especially for released artifacts)

>
>>
>> The question is now the jdk version. With this cassandra runtime
>> version it's now 1.7.
>> So are we ok to set 1.7 as a prerequisite?
>
> No problem here.

I was just started a discussion here and will probably start a more
official vote soon.


>
> - Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter   @brettporter
> http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
>



-- 
Olivier Lamy
Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au
http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy

Re: Cassandra storage and jdk version?

Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
On 1 Apr 2014, at 11:37 am, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> 
> I finished the implementation of the metadata storage using Cassandra.
> See docs here: http://archiva.apache.org/docs/2.0.2-SNAPSHOT/adminguide/repositories-content-storage.html
> Builds available from here:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/A-D/view/Archiva/job/archiva-all-maven-3.1.x-jdk-1.7/

Will take a look!

What is the impact on the app overall in terms of deployment, performance, memory, etc.?

> 
> The question is now the jdk version. With this cassandra runtime
> version it's now 1.7.
> So are we ok to set 1.7 as a prerequisite?

No problem here.

- Brett

--
Brett Porter   @brettporter
http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter