You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Konrad Windszus (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/01/29 14:19:39 UTC

[jira] [Created] (SLING-5469) Resource Merger: Add some name prefixing mechanism for properties which are used by the resource merger itself

Konrad Windszus created SLING-5469:
--------------------------------------

             Summary: Resource Merger: Add some name prefixing mechanism for properties which are used by the resource merger itself
                 Key: SLING-5469
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-5469
             Project: Sling
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Extensions
    Affects Versions: Resource Merger 1.2.10
            Reporter: Konrad Windszus


Currently within the resource merger it is not possible to
# use the {{jcr:primaryType}} of the underlying resource, while the overlaid/overridden resource has a different {{jcr:primaryType}}.
That is a problem because for a JCR the primaryType is mandatory for each node. Some node type definitions don't allow arbitrary property names like {{sling:hideResource}}. To be able to use those properties (which are only relevant up the point where the resource has been merged) you might need to use a more relaxed node type. Still you don't want that relaxed node type to appear as primaryType in the merged resource.
# use the {{sling:resourceSuperType}} from the underlying resource, while the overridden resource has a different {{sling:resourceSuperType}}. 
This is kind of a edge case because sling:resourceSuperType would be used for two different things here: 
** for getting the underlying resource path for the {{OverridingResourcePicker}}
** for the request resolution of the merged resource
Sometime the value for each of the cases would be different.

Therefore I propose a general property name mangling mechanism which allows someone to use a prefix like {{sling-resource-merging_}} for the properties, which are during the resource merging exposed as properties without the prefix. One example for case 1):
{code}
/apps/my/resource
- jcr:primaryType=nt:folder
- sling:resourceSuperType=apps/my/super/resource
- sling:hideProperties=customNodeTypePrefix:property1
- jcr:sling-resource-merging_primaryTypemyCustomNodeRestrictedNodeType

/apps/my/super/resource
- jcr:primaryType=myCustomNodeRestrictedNodeType
- customNodeTypePrefix:property1=test
- customNodeTypePrefix:property2=test

/mnt/override/apps/my/resource
- jcrPrimaryType=nt:unstructured (but should be myCustomNodeRestrictedNodeType)
- customNodeTypePrefix:property2=test
{code}
In this example it is impossible to let my merged resource have the nodeType  {{myCustomNodeRestrictedNodeType}} (because that simply does not allow the property {{sling:hideProperties}} to be set in {{/apps/my/resource}}.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)